Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning
Open accessAbstract
We review research related to the learning of complex motor skills with respect to principles developed on the basis of simple skill learning. Although some factors seem to have opposite effects on the learning of simple and of complex skills, other factors appear to be relevant mainly for the learning of more complex skills. We interpret these apparently contradictory findings as suggesting that situations with low processing demands benefit from practice conditions that increase the load and challenge the performer, whereas practice conditions that result in extremely high load should benefit from conditions that reduce the load to more manageable levels. The findings reviewed here call into question the generalizability of results from studies using simple laboratory tasks to the learning of complex motor skills. They also demonstrate the need to use more complex skills in motor-learning research in order to gain further insights into the learning process.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that motor-learning principles established with simple laboratory tasks often fail to transfer to complex skills. It proposes that low-demand tasks benefit from practice conditions that add challenge, whereas high-demand tasks benefit from conditions that reduce load.
Key findings
- Contextual interference effects are robust for simple tasks, but complex-skill studies are mixed: random practice sometimes helps, yet blocked practice is often better for novices or high-demand tasks. For example, Albaret and Thon found random practice best for the simplest drawing task, with the advantage shrinking and reversing as segments increased.
- Feedback effects differ by complexity: reducing feedback frequency usually helps simple skills, but complex tasks can benefit from more frequent feedback. On the ski simulator, 100% feedback produced later relative force onsets in retention than 50% or no feedback; in summary-feedback studies, optimal summary length was 5 trials for a complex simulated batting task versus 15–20 trials in simpler tasks.
- Feedback organization also differs: blocked feedback about one task component at a time improved complex ski-simulator learning relative to serial feedback, even after 4 days of practice, opposite to simple-task findings favoring random or serial schedules.
- Physical assistance and observational practice can help complex learning: ski poles improved later force onset and transferred to no-pole retention, while replacing 50% of physical practice with observation preserved retention and improved transfer; dyad training increased efficiency by at least 100% without sacrificing learning.
- Attentional focus matters mainly for complex skills: external focus instructions or feedback generally enhanced learning relative to internal focus, and in one study 16 participants chose an external focus versus 4 who chose an internal focus.
Methods
- Narrative review and theoretical synthesis, not a new empirical study.
- The authors contrast simple tasks (often one degree of freedom, mastered in one session, artificial) with complex tasks (multiple degrees of freedom, not mastered in one session, often ecologically valid).
- They review studies on contextual interference, feedback frequency and organization, physical guidance/assistance, attentional focus, and observational learning, using tasks such as barrier knockdown, ski simulator, stabilometer, bimanual coordination, and sport skills.
Limitations
- Stated: task complexity is multidimensional and difficult or impossible to quantify on a single continuum; the authors rely on qualitative judgments to classify tasks as simple or complex.
- Stated: research using complex motor skills is still relatively sparse, and some complex-skill findings, especially for contextual interference, are mixed or limited.
- Evident: as a narrative review, it does not use systematic search or meta-analytic synthesis; some cited evidence includes unpublished data and studies with small or specific samples, and the conclusions depend on selected comparisons across different tasks and paradigms.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 179 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisereasoning§ Contextual Interference
The contextual interference effect has proven to be a fairly robust phenomenon for the learning of simple skills in laboratory situations.
“Thus, the CI effect has proven to be a fairly robust phenomenon, at least for the learning of simple skills in laboratory situations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands
The findings challenge the assumption that a complete understanding of motor-learning processes can be gained by using simple laboratory-type tasks.
“These findings also challenge the assumption that a complete understandingof motor-learning processes can be gained by using simple laboratory-type tasks”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adams, 1971 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Title
Principles derived from studying simple motor skills do not generalize well to the learning of complex motor skills.
“Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning”
- Also stated in: § Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas · hedged
“The findings reviewed here call into question the generalizabilityof results from studies using simple laboratory tasks to the learning of complex motor skills.”
- Also stated in: § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands · hedged
“indicating that at least some of the principles that have been found for the acquisition of simple skills do not generalize very well to the learning of more complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas · hedged
- Interpretationreasoning§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands
Development of a movement representation for a more complex skill that requires coordination of many degrees of freedom and may initially be stored as independent subcomponents takes considerably longer and requires more effort and information-processing activities.
“the development of a movement representationfor a more complex skill that requires the coordinationof many degrees of freedom and may initially be stored as a series of relatively independent subcomponents typically takes considerably longer and inherently requires more effort and informationprocessing activities on the part of the learner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Some factors have opposite effects on the learning of simple and complex skills.
“Although some factors seem to have opposite effects on the learning of simple and of complex skills”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Interpretationreasoning
No single continuum is satisfactory for quantifying the complexity of the wide variety of motor tasks that have been investigated.
“no one continuum is satisfactory in quantifying the complexity of the wide variety of motor tasks that have been investigated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Other factors are relevant mainly for the learning of more complex skills.
“other factors appear to be relevant mainly for the learning of more complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ THEORETICAL AND REVIEW ARTICLES
A ski simulator task that requires several days of practice to develop moderate skill is initially more complex than typical barrier-knockdown or sequential keypress tasks in which performance asymptotes are sometimes achieved in as little as 54 trials.
“a ski simulator task, for example, that requires several days of practice to develop moderate levels of skill is initially more complex than typical barrier-knockdown tasks or sequential keypress tasks in which performance asymptotes are sometimes achieved in as little as 54 trials”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Contextual Interference
When the relative timing pattern required is simplified by making segment requirements equal across the task, the advantages of blocked over random practice on relative timing learning are lost.
“when the relative timing pattern required is greatly simplified by making the segment requirements equal across the task (Wright & Shea, 2001), the advantages of blocked, relative to random, practice on relative timing learning are lost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wright & Shea, 2001 source
- Interpretationcitation§ Summary.
Overall, studies on feedback frequency and organization in the complex ski simulator task show that findings from simple-task learning studies do not generalize well to complex skill learning.
“Overall, the studies in which the effects of feedback frequency (Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner, 1998) and feedback organization (Wulf & Bühner, 1996;Wulf, Hörger, & Shea, 1999) on the learning of a complex task, such as the ski simulator task, were examined demonstrate that the findings derived from simple-task learning studies do not generalize very well to complex skill learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner, 1998 source
- cites Wulf & Bühner, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wulf, Hörger, & Shea, 1999 source
- Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
- Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
- Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
By the end of the retention test in that study, the 100% feedback group produced later force onsets than at the end of practice with feedback present.
“By the end of the retention test, the participants in the 100% group produced even later force onsets than they did toward the end of the practice phase with feedback present.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner (1998) source
- Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
Task complexity and task-related experience interact with the optimal number of trials summarized.
“Guadagnoli, Dornier, and Tandy (1996) directly demonstrated that task complexity, as well as task-related experience, interacted with the optimal number of trials summarized.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guadagnoli, Dornier, and Tandy (1996) source
- Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
The optimal number of trials summarized decreases with more complex tasks.
“This interpretation is in line with summary knowledge of results studies showing that the optimal number of trials summarized decreases with more complex tasks (e.g., Schmidt et al., 1990;Schmidt et al., 1989;Yao et al., 1994)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ Contextual Interference
For novice performers learning a complex movement pattern, random practice can be too demanding and less effective than blocked practice.
“there are other studies that call into question the effectiveness of random practice, especially for novice performers attempting to learn a complex movement pattern.”
- Also stated in: § Contextual Interference · plain
“the blocked schedule was more advantageous than the alternating schedule for low-skilled learners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Contextual Interference · plain
- Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
For simple skills, concurrent feedback appears to produce a stronger dependency than postresponse feedback after each trial.
“At least for the learning of simple skills, concurrent feedback seems to produce an even stronger dependency on it than postresponse feedback after each trial does (Park, Shea, & Wright, 2000;Schmidt & Wulf, 1997;Vander Linden et al., 1993;Winstein et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
Reducing the proportion of trials for which augmented feedback is provided can result in more effective learning than giving feedback after every trial.
“reducing the proportion of trials for which augmented feedback (knowledge of results, knowledge of performance) is provided can result in more effective learning than does giving feedback after every single trial”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
In relatively simple tasks, the longest summary feedback lengths have been found to be most effective for learning.
“Whereas in experiments using relatively simple tasks, the largest summary feedback length proved to be the most effective for learning (e.g., a summary of 16 trials in Gable, Shea, & Wright, 1991;20 trials in Lavery, 1962;15 trials in Schmidt, Young, Swinnen, & Shapiro, 1989)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ Feedback frequency.
The results replicated Wulf and Bühner in showing that blocked feedback was clearly more effective for learning the complex ski simulator task.
“At any rate, the results replicated the findings of Wulf and Bühner in demonstrating that blocked feedback was clearly more effective for the learning of this complex task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf & Bühner, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premiseown data§ Feedback frequency.
Informal interviews at the end of the experiment confirmed that serial feedback participants found this type of feedback to be very attention demanding.
“Informal interviews at the end of the experiment confirmed that the serial feedback participants found this type of feedback to be very attention demanding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Feedback frequency.
There was no indication that the 100% feedback participants developed a dependency on feedback that reduced learning effectiveness.
“Thus, there was no indication that the 100% feedback participants developed a dependency on the feedback that reduced the learning effectiveness of this condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
Winstein and Schmidt found that reducing feedback frequency to 50% of trials was more beneficial for learning a lever-patterning task than giving 100% feedback.
“using a lever-patterning task, Winstein and Schmidt found that reducing the feedback frequency to 50% of the trials was more beneficial for the learning of this task than giving 100% feedback.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Winstein & Schmidt, 1990 source
- Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
Summary feedback and average feedback about 5-trial blocks were more advantageous for learning than 15-trial blocks or every-trial feedback.
“Yao, Fischman, and Wang (1994) found that both summary feedback and average feedback (where an average error or performance score is provided after a set of trials) about 5-trial blocks was more advantageous for learning than was feedback about 15-trial blocks or every-trial feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yao, Fischman, and Wang (1994) source
- Interpretationcitation§ Feedback frequency.
More frequent feedback may be necessary for learning complex skills.
“there is evidence to suggest that more frequent feedback might be required for the learning of complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.
In a barrier-knocking task, random feedback organization was more effective than blocked organization in immediate no-feedback retention tests.
“In (immediate) nofeedback retention tests, the random feedback organization turned out to be more effective than the blocked organization.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ Summary.
Reducing relative feedback frequency did not enhance learning of the ski simulator task.
“In contrast to the simple laboratory tasks used in many studies, reducing relative feedback frequency did not enhance learning of the ski simulator task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Feedback frequency.
In contrast to simple skill learning, learning of more complex motor skills benefits from relatively high feedback frequencies, at least until a certain level of experience is reached.
“Thus, it seems that, in contrast to simple skill learning, the learning of more complex motor skills benefits from relatively high feedback frequencies (at least until a certain level of experience is reached).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Summary.
The likelihood that a learner becomes dependent on extrinsic feedback and neglects intrinsic feedback is reduced in complex tasks compared with simple skills.
“Thus, the likelihoodof the learner's becoming dependent on extrinsic feedback and neglecting the processing of intrinsic feedback is reduced, as compared with the learning of simple skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
Baumeister (1984) demonstrated that self-focused attention on motor performance can disrupt performance.
“Also, Baumeister (1984) demonstrated that selffocused attention on motor performance-for example, from competition, a cash incentive, or audience-induced pressure-can disrupt performance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baumeister, 1984
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation§ Attentional Focus
Feedback given during practice can be more effective if it directs attention to movement effects rather than to movements themselves.
“This suggests that the feedback given to performers during practice can be more effective if it directs their attention to the movement effects, rather than to the movements themselves.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
This advantage was true for novices and advanced players.
“This was true not only for novices, but also for advanced player who already had experience with the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
For experts, external-focus feedback tended to result in better movement form than internal-focus feedback during both practice and retention.
“For the experts, external-focus feedback tended to result in a better movement form than did internal-focus feedback during both practice and retention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ VARIABLES INFLUENCING MAINLY COMPLEX SKILL LEARNING
Learning principles derived from simple skills do not necessarily generalize to the learning of more complex skills.
“As the previous sections have shown, learning principles derived from the study of simple skills are not necessarily generalizable to the learning of more complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Summary.
More feedback may be required to optimize complex skill learning.
“This suggests that more feedback might be required to optimize complex skill learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Attentional Focus
Instructions directing attention to movement effects are more beneficial for learning than instructions focusing attention on one's own movements.
“Thus, the instructions that directed the learners' attention to the effects of their movement were more beneficial for learning than the instructions focusing the learners' attention on their own movements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
There is plenty of anecdotal evidence for detrimental effects of paying attention to coordination of one's movements, at least for well-practiced skills.
“In addition, there is plenty of anecdotal evidence for the detrimental effects of paying attention to the coordination of one's movements, at least when it comes to the performance of well-practiced skills”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Gallwey, 1982
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schmidt, 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schneider & Fisk, 1983 source
- Interpretationcitation§ Attentional Focus
These findings corroborate the view that distracting performers from their own movements by focusing on an external movement effect can greatly enhance performance.
“These findings corroborate the view that distracting performers from their own movements by having them focus on an external movement effect can greatly enhance performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Physical Assistance
These results are not in line with guidance or specificity-of-learning notions, according to which unguided practice should have been more effective for learning than practice with physical guidance or assistance.
“These results are not in line with guidance(e.g., Schmidt, 1991aSchmidt, , 1991b;;Schmidt & Wrisberg, 2000) or specificityof-learning notions (e.g., Henry, 1968), according to which unguided practice should have been more effective for learning than was practice with physical guidance or assistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Schmidt, 1991a source
- cites Schmidt, 1991b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schmidt & Wrisberg, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Attentional Focus
These findings indicate that the function of augmented feedback was not only informational or motivational in nature.
“indicate that the function of augmented feedback was not only informational or motivational in nature (see Adams, 1987).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adams, 1987 source
- Interpretationcitation§ Attentional Focus
The external-focus effect seems generalizable to the acquisition of other real-world skills.
“The findings demonstrate that this effect seems to be generalizable to the acquisition of other realworld skills as well.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Physical Assistance
Winstein et al. showed that physical guidance had effects on learning similar to those of feedback about the movement outcome.
“In fact, Winstein et al. (1994) showed that physical guidance had effects on learning similar to those of feedback about the movement outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Winstein et al. (1994) source
- Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
In Wulf, McConnel, Gärtner, and Schwarz (in press), accuracy of volleyball serves was greatly enhanced by external-focus relative to internal-focus feedback, during practice and after a 1-week retention interval without feedback.
“The results showed that the accuracy of the serves was greatly enhanced by the external-focus, relative to the internal-focus feedback, not only during practice, but also after a 1-week retention interval in a retention test without feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, McConnel, Gärtner, & Schwarz, in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
The feedback group with an external attentional focus had lower errors than the feedback group with an internal attentional focus.
“the feedback group that had adopted an external focus of attention had lower errors than the feedback group with an internal attentional focus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea & Wulf, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Physical Assistance
In positioning-movement studies, reducing the proportion of presentation trials with a mechanical stop produced more effective learning than a relatively high proportion, as assessed by retention or transfer tests without the stop.
“In both studies, reducing the proportion of presentation trials, in which performers were presented with the mechanical stop, produced more effective learning, as assessed by retention or transfer tests without the stop, than did a relatively high proportion of presentation trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
Giving learners instructions that could be assumed to enhance learning is not necessarily beneficial for the performance and learning of a complex skill.
“giving learners instructions that could be assumed to enhance the learning process is not necessarily beneficial for the performance and learning of a complex skill (Wulf & Weigelt, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf & Weigelt, 1997 source
- Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
External-focus benefits have been found for tennis.
“Recently, external-focus benefits have also been found for tennis (Maddox, Wulf, & Wright, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Maddox, Wulf, & Wright, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation§ Summary.
Contrary to simple skill learning, concentrating feedback on one task component at a time (blocked feedback) was more beneficial for learning the ski simulator task than frequently changing the component receiving feedback (serial feedback).
“Furthermore, contrary to simple skill learning, concentrating the feedback on one task component at a time (blocked feedback) was found to be more beneficial for the learning of the ski simulator task than were frequent changes in the component about which feedback was provided (serial feedback).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
Instructions that direct performers' attention to their body movements are not very effective.
“instructions that direct the performers' attention to their body movements-similar to the instructionsgiven in Wulf and Weigelt's (1997) studyare not very effective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ Summary.
Providing concurrent feedback on 100% of practice trials was most effective for learning the ski simulator task.
“In fact, providing concurrent feedback on 100% of the practice trials turned out to be most effective for learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Attentional Focus
These results support the view that the beneficial effect of an external relative to internal attentional focus is a general and robust phenomenon.
“Thus, these results provide support for the view that the beneficial effect of an external, relative to an internal, attentional focus is a general and robust phenomenon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Summary.
In contrast to simple skills, learning of complex skills with inherently high attentional, memory, or control demands can be facilitated by relatively frequent feedback.
“This is in line with the notion that, in contrast to simple skills, the learning of complex skills-with inherently high attentional,memory, or control demands-can be facilitated by providing the learner with relatively frequent feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
- Premisecitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Blocked feedback seems beneficial for learning complex skills.
“Similarly, blocked feedback, although detrimental for simple skill learning, relative to random feedback, seems to be beneficial for the learning of complex skills (e.g., Lee & Carnahan, 1990;Wulf, Hörger, & Shea, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ Attentional Focus
Motor skill learning can be enhanced by focusing learners' attention on the effects of their movements (external attentional focus).
“Rather, they demonstrate that motor skill learning can be enhanced by focusing the learners' attention on the effects of their movements (i.e., by inducing an external attentional focus).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Attentional Focus
Actions should be more effective if planned in terms of intended outcome rather than specific movement patterns.
“Therefore, actions should be more effective if they are planned in terms of their intended outcome, rather than in terms of the specific movement patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Observational Learning
Observation may provide the learner with a better picture of how various subcomponents of a complex task fit together to form the whole task.
“In addition, observation may provide the learner with a better”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Blocked feedback is detrimental for simple skill learning relative to random feedback.
“Similarly, blocked feedback, although detrimental for simple skill learning, relative to random feedback, seems to be beneficial for the learning of complex skills (e.g., Lee & Carnahan, 1990;Wulf, Hörger, & Shea, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Some variables that improve learning of simple skills are not beneficial, or are harmful, for complex skill learning.
“Some factors that enhance the learning of simple skills do not appear to be beneficial for complex skill learning.”
- Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
“In fact, research on more complex skills shows that the manipulation of practice variables that result in enhanced learning of simple skills are actually detrimental to the learning of complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Conclusions · plain
- Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
In McNevin et al., two groups focusing on markers at greater distance made more and smaller corrections in maintaining balance than a group focusing on markers close to feet.
“Furthermore, in the McNevin et al. study, two groups that focused on markers at a greater distance from the feet made even more and smaller corrections in maintaining their balance than did a group that focused on the markers close to the feet.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McNevin et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
Switching hand placements caused performance decrements when stimulus-response mapping changed, even if mappings of stimuli to fingers remained the same.
“However, switching hand placements did cause performance decrements when the stimulus-response mapping changed, even if the mappings of stimuli to fingers remained the same.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor & Dutta, 1993 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Observational Learning
Observation may facilitate structuring of memories supporting movements, reducing total memory demands.
“observation may facilitate the structuring of the memories supporting the movements, thus effectively reducing the total memory demands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Attentional Focus
The findings reviewed suggest that giving learners instructions or feedback that direct attention to coordination of body movements (internal focus), often used in teaching, might not be optimal for learning.
“The findings reviewed above suggest that giving learners instructions or feedback that direct their attention to the coordination of their body movements (i.e., induce an internal focus of atten-tion), which are often used in teaching motor skills, might not be optimal for learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
Action planning and perception typically involve distal events, since this is the only format allowing commensurate coding and efficient planning of action.
“That is, action planning and perception typically involves distal events, since this is the only format that allows for commensurate coding and thus for efficient planning of action (see Prinz, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prinz, 1992 source
- Premisecitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Frequent feedback can be advantageous for learning new complex skills.
“Yet frequent feedback can be advantageous, if new complex skills have to be learned (e.g., Guadagnoli et al., 1996;Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Observational Learning
Observational practice in learning simple tasks has led to equivocal findings.
“On the other hand, observational practice in learning simple tasks has led to equivocal findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Principles derived from simple motor skills are not always applicable to more complex motor skills.
“As we have shown in the first section of this review, principles developed on the basis of simple skills are not always generalizable to more complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
In McNevin, Shea, and Wulf (in press) and Wulf, Shea, and Park (2001), participants focusing on feet (internal) showed higher amplitude and lower frequency movement adjustments than those focusing on markers (external).
“Participants who focused on their feet (internal focus) showed higher amplitude and lower frequency movement adjustments than did participants focusing on markers in front of their feet (external focus; Wulf, Shea, & Park, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McNevin, Shea, & Wulf, in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Wulf, Shea, & Park, 2001 source
- Premisecitation§ Attentional Focus
In Proctor and Dutta (1993), switching hand placements did not increase RT when spatial stimulus-response mappings remained constant.
“The important finding in the present context was that switching hand placements did not lead to increases in RT when the spatial stimulus-response mappings remained constant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Proctor & Dutta, 1993 source
- Premisecitation§ Observational Learning
In a number of experiments involving simple motor tasks, observation has been shown to enhance learning.
“In a number of experiments involving simple motor tasks (e.g., Blandin, Proteau, & Alain, 1994;Burwitz, 1975;Lee & White, 1990), observation has been shown to enhance learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ Observational Learning
Reducing task demands to facilitate practice did not harm learning relative to practicing the whole task.
“Thus, facilitating practice by reducing the task demands had no detrimental effect on learning, as compared with practicing the whole task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Observational Learning
Replacing half of physical practice trials with observational practice produced no retention decrements compared with practicing physically on all trials.
“When 50% of the physical practice trials were replaced with observational practice, no decrements in retention performance were noted, as compared with a group that practiced physically on all practice trials (C.H. Shea et al., 2000, Experiment 2; also see Weeks & Anderson, 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ Observational Learning
Observation-based practice tends to be more consistently effective for complex skills than for simple ones, where there is more for the observer to extract.
“In summary, it appears that observational practice is more uniformly effective in complex than in simple tasks, in which there is more for the observer to “see” and, therefore, extract from observation (e.g., Burwitz, 1975;Gould, 1980).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Burwitz, 1975
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Gould, 1980
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: Complex motor skills generally impose higher attention demands than simple motor skills.
- Rests on an assumption: Simple motor tasks tend to have much lower cognitive demands than complex tasks.
- Premisecitation§ Observational Learning
The combined observational and physical practice group performed better than the physical practice group on the transfer test.
“More important, the performance of the combined obser-vational and physical practice group was superior to that of the physical practice group on the transfer test.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Observational Learning
Observation can give learners processing opportunities in complex tasks that physical practice would not generally provide until the skill is well learned and attention demands are much lower.
“From this perspective, observational practice offers processing opportunities in complex tasks that would not generally be afforded under physical practice conditions until the skill had become well learned (automated) and attention demands had been greatly reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data§ Observational Learning
Learners who practiced with a partner showed better delayed retention than learners who practiced individually.
“More important, learners who had practiced with a partner showed more effective delayed retention performance than did individual learners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Blocked practice can result in more effective learning for complex tasks or inexperienced learners.
“Furthermore, random practice, which has often been shown to enhance motor learning when simple tasks were used, does not seem to be beneficial for the learning of more complex tasks (or for inexperienced learners); rather, blocked practice can result in more effective learning in these cases (e.g., Albaret & Thon, 1999;Hebert et al., 1996;J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Random practice often enhances motor learning when simple tasks are used.
“Furthermore, random practice, which has often been shown to enhance motor learning when simple tasks were used, does not seem to be beneficial for the learning of more complex tasks (or for inexperienced learners); rather, blocked practice can result in more effective learning in these cases (e.g., Albaret & Thon, 1999;Hebert et al., 1996;J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Some theoretical concepts developed from simple skill research are not applicable to complex skills.
“As we have shown, some of the theoretical concepts developed from the research on simple skills are not applicable to complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Frequent physical assistance can enhance complex motor skill learning when it helps learners explore movement strategies or techniques, compared with practice without physical guidance.
“Finally, frequent physical assistance can enhance the learning of complex motor skills, at least if it facilitates the exploration of movement strategies or techniques, relative to practice without the help of physical guidance (Wulf, Shea, & Whitacre, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, & Whitacre, 1998 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Generalizing to complex skill training from findings based on simple tasks appears problematic.
“The usefulness of simple laboratory tasks for understanding the processes underlying motor learning seems to be limited, and making generalizations to the training of complex skills on the basis of such findings appears to be problematic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusions
An external focus of attention improved learning of large-amplitude movements on the ski simulator, compared with an internal focus and with no attentional-focus instructions.
“An external focus of attention enhanced the learning of large-amplitude movements, relative to an internal focus and to no instructions regarding the attentional focus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Höß, and Prinz (1998) source
- Premisecitation§ Conclusions
Dyad practice produced more effective learning than individual practice.
“Dyad practice produced more effective learning than did individual practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea, Wulf, and Whitacre (1999) source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Observational Learning
Observation lowers cognitive demands because the observer does not physically perform the task and can focus on fundamental task elements, component relationships, and strategies.
“observational practice offers a form of practice in which the cognitive demands are sufficiently reduced, because the observer is not required to physically perform the task and can concentrate on the fundamental elements of the task and the relationships between components and can devise or evaluate strategies that result in effective task performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Observational Learning
C. H. Shea et al. (2000) found learning advantages for combined observational and physical practice over physical practice alone.
“Using such a protocol, C. H. Shea et al. (2000) even found learning advantages of combined observational and physical practice over physical practice alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea et al., 2000 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
Some practice variables may be especially effective for complex skill learning relative to simpler skill learning.
“Moreover, as was shown in the second section of our review, some practice variables might be particularly effective for the learning of complex skills, relative to more simple skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ SUMMARY, FUTURE DIRECTIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS
The study of simple tasks has not been effective in determining meaningful principles that apply to more complex skills.
“Thus, we agree with our pedagogy colleagues, Hoffman (1990) and Locke, that the study of simple tasks has not been effective in determining meaningful principles that have application to more complex skills.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hoffman, 1990 source
- cites Locke
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
In motor skill learning, the positive and negative effects of practice variables change with task complexity and the demands the task places on the learner.
“It seems that with motor skill learning, positive and negative effects of practice variables change, depending on the complexity of the task and the demands the task places on the learner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills
The usefulness of simple laboratory tasks for understanding the processes underlying motor learning seems limited.
“The usefulness of simple laboratory tasks for understanding the processes underlying motor learning seems to be limited, and making generalizations to the training of complex skills on the basis of such findings appears to be problematic.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Observational Learning
Later in practice, inappropriate or incorrect performance elements may become well learned, more dominant, and harder to change.
“However, later in practice, inappropriate or even incorrect performance elements may have become well learned and therefore more dominant and difficult to change (see Wightman & Lintern, 1985).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wightman & Lintern, 1985 source
- Interpretationown data§ Observational Learning
The benefits of dyad training transferred to a situation in which participants had to perform individually.
“That is, the benefits of dyad training transferred to a situation in which participants had to perform individually.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
- May combine two claims. 57
- Not yet classified. 21
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusLower levels of action identity refer to details of the action, while higher levels relate to effects of the action.
“Lower levels in an action's identity structure refer to the details of the action, such as the specific movements (e.g., striking the correct keys on a piano), whereas higher levels are more related to the effects of the action (e.g., playing the melody).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusVallacher and Wegner's action identification theory proposes a hierarchical order of action identities used in control of action.
“In their action identification theory, Vallacher and Wegner proposed a hierarchical order of action identities that are used in the control of action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIf a performer selects too low a level of action control, performance is often disrupted.
“If the performer selects too low a level of action control-for example, because of pressure to perform well-performance is often disrupted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source
The Performance Impairment section (p. 7) says that controlling an easy or familiar action at too low a level can disrupt it. It does not say disruption occurs often; it also describes pressure to perform well as emphasizing higher-level meanings, rather than as an example of selecting too low a level. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIf lower and higher levels of action identity are available, higher level identities become prepotent.
“They argued that if lower and higher levels of action identity are available, higher level identities become prepotent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Contextual InterferenceRandom practice is usually more effective than blocked practice for learning simple skills with low memory demands and/or for experienced participants; for complex skills with high memory and processing demands, blocked practice might be more effective, at least early in learning.
“random practice is usu-ally more effective than blocked practice when it comes to the learning of simple skills, for which the memory demands are relatively low, and/or when participants are experienced to the extent that they have functionally reduced the demands on memory”
- Also stated in: § Contextual Interference · hedged
“For the learning of more complex skills for which memory and processing demands are high, blocked practice might be more effective, at least early in the learning process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Contextual Interference · hedged
Not yet classified.
Interpretation§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing DemandsIntroducing additional demands during complex skill learning may be detrimental because the additional demands compete with essential processing activities for a limited amount of processing capacity.
“It is conceivable that introducing additional demands for the learner during this process is actually detrimental, rather than beneficial, because the additional demands compete with the essential processing activities for a limited amount of processing capacity during the learning process.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified- Rests on an assumption: Learners have a limited amount of processing capacity.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Contextual InterferenceJ. B. Shea and Morgan first demonstrated the contextual interference effect for motor skill learning.
“J. B. Shea and Morgan (1979) were the first to demonstrate the CI effect for motor skill learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979 source
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ THEORETICAL AND REVIEW ARTICLESFunctional task complexity changes as a result of expertise, and as an individual develops expertise with a task, the functional complexity of the task decreases.
“functional task complexity changes as a result of expertise.”
- Also stated in: § THEORETICAL AND REVIEW ARTICLES · plain
“as an individual performer develops expertise with a task, the functional complexity of the task decreases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- Also stated in: § THEORETICAL AND REVIEW ARTICLES · plain
Not yet classified.
Premise§ Contextual InterferenceSmith and Davies found benefits of high contextual interference practice for learning the Pawlata kayak roll, and Wrisberg and colleagues found that alternating different serves produced more effective learning than blocked practice.
“One study that found benefits of high-CI practice for the learning of a sport skill is a study by Smith and Davies (1995), who used the Pawlata kayak roll.”
- Also stated in: § Contextual Interference
“Wrisberg and colleagues (Wrisberg, 1991;Wrisberg & Liu, 1991) have found additional convincing evidence for the greater effectiveness of practice conditions that included frequent changes between tasks.In both studies, alternating different serves produced more effective learning than did blocked practice.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 3 sources checked- Also stated in: § Contextual Interference
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing DemandsA random practice order exercises retrieval processes that later facilitate test performance and requires more effort than blocked practice, so performance at test is usually enhanced.
“because a random practice order of different tasks exercises retrieval processes that later facilitate test performanceand therefore requires more effort than does blocked practice-performance at the time of the test is usually enhanced”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Magill & Hall, 1990 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Contextual InterferenceThe learning advantages of random over blocked practice have been replicated in numerous laboratory experiments since J. B. Shea and Morgan.
“Since the J. B. Shea and Morgan (1979) study, the learning advantages of random, as compared with blocked, practice have been replicated in numerous laboratory experiments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Texas A&M University, College Station, TexasIn situations with low processing demands, practice conditions that increase load and challenge the performer benefit learning; in situations with extremely high load, conditions that reduce load to manageable levels benefit learning.
“situations with low processing demands benefit from practice conditions that increase the load and challenge the performer, whereas practice conditions that result in extremely high load should benefit from conditions that reduce the load to more manageable levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimNot yet classified.
Interpretation§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing DemandsComplex skill learning might be enhanced by providing practice conditions that facilitate performance until a relatively stable movement representation is acquired.
“complex skill learning might be enhanced by providing the learner with practice conditions that facilitate performance (at least until a relatively stable movement presentation is acquired).”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing DemandsFor relatively simple skills, a rough movement representation may be developed within a few practice trials, and further refinement of the skill depends on the extent to which the learner is challenged by practice conditions.
“For relatively simple skills, a rough movement representation may be developed within a few practice trials, and it is easy to see that a further refinement of the skill is dependent on the extent to which the learner is challenged by the practice conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe tasks used to examine effects of variables on motor learning have generally been relatively simple, often involving one degree of freedom, requiring small amounts of practice to reach asymptotes, and placing modest demands on attention, memory, and processing.
“In general, however, the tasks used to examine the effects of these variables on learning have been relatively simpleoften including only one degree of freedom, requiring comparatively small amounts of practice to reach performance asymptotes, and placing relatively modest demands on attention,memory, and/or processing capacity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimNot yet classified.
Premise§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing DemandsMaking augmented feedback difficult to use, for example by delaying it or withholding it on some practice trials, is beneficial for test performance because it forces learners to develop their own internal error-correction and error-detection mechanisms.
“making augmented feedback difficult to use-for example, by delaying it or by withholdingit on some practice trials-has been argued to be beneficial for test performance because it forces learners to develop their own internal error-correction-and-detection mechanisms”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt, 1991a source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing DemandsPractice conditions that promote additional cognitive effort or require additional information-processing activities critical for test performance are most effective for learning simple skills.
“practice conditions that promote additional cognitive effort (Lee, Swinnen, & Serrien, 1994) or require the learner to engage in additionalinformation-processing activities that are critical for test performance (Schmidt & Bjork, 1992) are most effective for learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing DemandsComplex skills may be sensitive to variables that are not particularly relevant for simple skills.
“it is also possible that complex skills are sensitive to variables that are not particularly relevant for simple skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimNot yet classified.
Interpretation§ Contextual InterferenceThe contextual interference effect has been demonstrated fairly consistently for relatively simple laboratory tasks, but this does not seem to be the case for more complex skills.
“whereas the CI effect has been demonstrated fairly consistently for relatively simple laboratory tasks, this does not seem to be the case for more complex skills.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedNot yet classified.
Premise§ Feedback frequency.Delaying feedback for a few seconds produces more effective learning than giving feedback immediately after or concurrently with the movement.
“delaying the feedback for a few seconds has been found to produce more effective learning than does giving feedback immediately after or even concurrently with the movement”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 3 sources checkedNot yet classified.
Premise§ Contextual InterferenceRecent experiments consistently found relative timing advantages for constant and blocked practice relative to serial and random practice, directly opposite the typical contextual interference effect.
“a number of recent experiments (e.g., Lai & Shea, 1998, 1999;Lai, Shea, Wulf, & Wright, 2000;C. H. Shea, Lai, Wright, Immink, & Black, 2001;Whitacre & Shea, 2000) consistently found relative timing advantages for constant and blocked practice, relative to serial and random practice, directly opposite the typical CI effect.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.In animal conditioning, partial reinforcement slows acquisition but maintains learning for much longer than continuous reinforcement does.
“partial reinforcement has been shown to slow acquisition but also to maintain learning for much longer than continuous reinforcement does.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tarpy, 1982
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Contextual InterferenceWright, Li, and Whitacre found that additional processing disrupted learning under random-practice conditions but had positive effects under blocked conditions.
“Wright, Li, and Whitacre (1992; also see Lee, Wishart, Cunningham, & Carnahan, 1997) found that additional processing disrupted learning under random-practice conditions but had positive effects under blocked conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wright, Li, & Whitacre, 1992 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.Beneficial learning effects of reduced feedback in humans are seen not only in no-feedback retention tests but also in 100% feedback retention tests, which argues against the extinction explanation.
“one set of findings that argues against such an explanation for human learning is that beneficial learning effects of reduced feedback are seen not only in no-feedback retention tests, but also in 100% feedback retention tests.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Feedback frequency.Contrary to simple tasks in which reducing relative feedback frequency is more beneficial, learning of the more complex ski simulator task was enhanced by 100% feedback.
“Thus, contrary to studies that used more simple tasks in which reducing the relative feedback frequency was more beneficial for learning than was providing learners with feedback after or during every practice trial (e.g., Schmidt & Wulf, 1997;Winstein & Schmidt, 1990;Wulf & Schmidt, 1989;Wulf et al., 1993), the learning of this more complex task was enhanced by 100% feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Schmidt & Wulf, 1997 source
- cites Winstein & Schmidt, 1990 source
- cites Wulf & Schmidt, 1989 source
- Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.In that study, only the 100% feedback group was significantly more effective than the control group, while the 50% group did not differ significantly from either group.
“Furthermore, only the 100% group was significantly more effective than the control group, whereas the 50% group did not differ significantly from either group.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner (1998) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.For a more complex simulated batting task, the optimal number of summary trials was lower than for simpler tasks, with a 5-trial summary being more beneficial than 15-trial or 1-trial summaries.
“Schmidt, Lange, and Young (1990) showed that the optimal number of summary trials for a more complex simulated batting task was lower than those found for more simple tasks.In this case, a summary of 5 trials was more beneficial than longer (15) or shorter (1) feedback summaries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmidt, Lange, and Young (1990) source
Not yet classified.
Interpretation§ Feedback frequency.The principles underlying animal reinforcement and feedback in humans have some similarities but also important differences.
“This suggests that although the principles underlying animal reinforcement and feedback in humans have some similarities, they show some important differences as well.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedNot yet classified.
Premise§ Feedback frequency.The advantage of 100% feedback occurred even though the feedback was continuous and concurrent.
“Interestingly, this advantage occurred even though the feedback given in the Wulf, Shea, and Matschiner (1998) study was continuous and concurrent.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, and Matschiner (1998) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Contextual InterferenceComplex tasks requiring considerably more memory capacity per task may exceed the performer's capacity, especially early in practice when a single complex task may initially be stored as a series of subcomponents.
“complex tasks, presumably requiring considerably more memory capacity per task, may exceed the capacity of the performer.This may be especially true early in practice, where a single complex task may be initially stored as a series of subcomponents”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Povel & Collard, 1982 source
Not yet classified.
Premise§ Feedback frequency.Learning of simple skills tends to improve when augmented feedback is reduced or delayed, although this effect is stronger under variable practice conditions.
“Although the learning of simple skills seems to benefit from reducing or delaying the augmented feedback (although this effect appears to be stronger for variable practice conditions; see Lai & Shea, 1998)”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lai & Shea, 1998 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.In the ski simulator study, during delayed retention the 100% feedback group improved across trials, the 50% feedback group showed no gains, and the control group showed a performance decrement.
“However, the group that had received the most feedback (100%) during practice showed a clear performance improvement across trials, whereas the 50% feedback group showed no such performance gains, and the control group even demonstrated a performance decrement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner (1998) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.Long feedback summaries benefited learning of a relatively simple striking task for both novices and experienced participants, and benefited a more complex double-striking task for experienced participants, but single-trial feedback was more effective than longer summaries for novices learning a complex task.
“whereas relatively long feedback summaries benefited the learning of a relatively simple striking task for both novice and experienced participants, as well as the learning of a more complex double-striking task for experienced participants, single-trial feedback was more effective than longer feedback summaries for novices trying to learn a complex task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guadagnoli et al. (1996) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Feedback frequency.The 100% feedback group developed a more effective error-detection-and-correction mechanism than the 50% and no-feedback conditions, enabling further performance improvements without feedback.
“Rather, it seems that the participants in the 100% feedback group developed a more effective error-detection-and-correction mechanism (e.g., Salmoni et al., 1984;Schmidt, 1991a), as compared with the 50% feedback and no-feedback (control) conditions, which enabled them to demonstrate further performance improvements even in the absence of feedback.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ Feedback frequency.Immediate reinforcement is more effective than delayed reinforcement in animal learning, but this is not the case for skill learning in humans.
“immediate reinforcement is more effective than delayed reinforcement in animal learning, but this is not the case for skill learning in humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown data§ Feedback frequency.In that experiment, the beneficial effects of blocked practice appeared in amplitude, while there were no significant group differences in force onset.
“In this experiment, the beneficial effects of blocked practice were seen in amplitude, whereas there were no significant group differences in force onset (even though feedback was given about force onset, as in Wulf & Bühner, 1996)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Hörger, and Shea (1999) source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Feedback frequency.Concurrent feedback typically has strong performance-enhancing effects during practice but results in clear performance decrements relative to postresponse feedback when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests.
“concurrent feedback typically has strong performance-enhancing effects during practice, but results in clear performance decrements, relative to postresponse feedback, when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ VARIABLES INFLUENCING MAINLY COMPLEX SKILL LEARNINGObservational practice seems to have clear benefits for more complex skills.
“it seems to have clear benefits for more complex skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Attentional FocusA number of studies have demonstrated that the performer's focus of attention can have a decisive influence on performance and learning.
“A number of studies have demonstrated that the performer's focus of attention can have a decisive influence on performance and learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimNot yet classified.
Interpretation§ Summary.The negative effects thought to be associated with the guidance provided by frequent feedback appear to be reduced in complex tasks.
“That is, the negative effects thought to be associated with the guidance provided by frequent feedback seem to be reduced.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Physical AssistanceFor complex movements with many degrees of freedom, there may be advantages to using physical assistance procedures, supporting the view that complex skill learning benefits from reducing demands on the learner.
“For complex movements with many degrees of freedom, such as those encountered in many sports situations, there might actually be advantages to using physical assistance procedures, corroborating the view that complex skill learning benefits from reducing the demands imposed on the learner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
- Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Physical AssistanceThe benefits in force onset provided by the poles during practice were not only temporary; they transferred to a no-pole situation and were relatively permanent, meaning the poles enhanced learning of a more efficient movement pattern relative to practice without poles.
“Thus, the benefits in force onset provided by the poles during practice were not only temporary effects.Rather, these benefits transferred to a situation in which no poles could be used, and they were relatively permanent in nature; that is, the poles enhanced the learning of a more efficient movement pattern, relative to practice without poles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ VARIABLES INFLUENCING MAINLY COMPLEX SKILL LEARNINGSome principles or phenomena relevant to complex skill learning may be less powerful or may not appear in simple laboratory tasks.
“some principles or phenomena that could be relevant for the learning of complex skills might be less powerful or might not show up in tasks such as those typically used in the laboratory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ Physical AssistancePhysical assistance may be conducive to learning to the extent that it allows the learner to explore the perceptual-motor workspace.
“It is conceivable that physical assistance is conducive to learning to the extent that it allows the learner to explore the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newell, 1991 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn Wulf and Weigelt's ski simulator experiment, instructions to delay forcing the platform until after the center did not enhance learning and were detrimental to practice and stress transfer relative to no instructions.
“Wulf and Weigelt found that the instructions did not enhance the learning of this task; rather, they were detrimental to performance during practice and transfer to a”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf & Weigelt, 1997 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ VARIABLES INFLUENCING MAINLY COMPLEX SKILL LEARNINGA characteristic of complex motor skills that is difficult to simulate with simple tasks is that the performer can direct attention to various aspects of the task.
“One characteristic of complex motor skills that is difficult to simulate with simple tasks is that the performer can direct his or her attention to various aspects of the task.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Physical AssistanceOn the ski simulator, the poles may have enabled learners to experience that shifting weight from the outer to the inner foot relatively late is more effective; this experience shortened the learning process and allowed learners to reach a given performance level in less time.
“On the ski simulator, the poles might have enabled learners to experience (consciouslyor unconsciously) that it is more effective to shift the weight from the outer to the inner foot relatively late-that is, to delay the force onset of the inner foot.This experience provided by the poles served to shorten the learning process and enabled the learners to reach a given level of performance in less”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn Wulf, Höß, and Prinz (1998, Experiment 1), external focus on wheels was more effective for producing large movement amplitudes than internal focus on feet in both practice and retention, and internal focus was not different from control.
“The results indicated that the latter condition was much more effective for the production of large movement amplitudes than was the internal focus condition in both practice and retention, which was not different from a control condition without additional instructions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Höß, & Prinz, 1998 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusTodorov, Shadmehr, and Bizzi (1997) argued that the highest level of motor planning and control is in terms of kinematics of the end-effector, so feedback should be most effective if it represents end-effector movements rather than body movements.
“Todorov et al. argued that the highest level of motor planning and control seems to be in terms of the kinematics of the endeffector and that, therefore, the feedback given to the learner should be most effective if it represents the movements of the end-effector, rather than the body movements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Todorov, Shadmehr, & Bizzi, 1997 source
May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn Wulf, Shea, and Park (2001), a considerably greater number of participants chose external focus on markers (n=16) rather than internal focus on feet (n=4); those choosing markers were clearly more effective in retention than those focusing on feet.
“A considerably greater number of participants chose to focus on the markers that were located in front of their feet (n = 16), rather than on the feet themselves (n = 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, & Park, 2001 source
Not yet classified.
Interpretation§ Summary.Feedback in complex tasks is generally less prescriptive than in many simple tasks, because complex tasks often require coordination of different components, making it difficult for a single feedback measure to be truly prescriptive.
“It should also be noted, however, that feedback in complex tasks is generally not as prescriptive as it often is in many of the simple tasks that have been used in this context.In complex tasks, there are often different components that have to be coordinated to produce skilled performance, making it much more difficult for a single feedback measure to be truly prescriptive.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classifiedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusThe advantage in movement outcome was not accomplished at the expense of movement form; expert ratings showed both feedback types led to similar improvements in form.
“Furthermore, this advantage in the movement outcome was not accomplished at the expense of movement form.As was determined through expert ratings, both types of feedback led to similar improvements in form.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Not yet classified.
Interpretation§ Physical AssistanceThese results suggest that there may be limits to the generalizability of findings from studies using typical laboratory tasks with few degrees of freedom.
“These results again suggest that there may be limitations to the generalizabilityof findings from studies using typical laboratory tasks with few degrees of freedom.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified- Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
- Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Physical AssistanceThe benefits of physical guidance appear to be mainly temporary: guidance often enhances performance during practice, but when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests, performance is often less effective than that of learners who practiced without or with less guidance.
“As Schmidt (1988Schmidt ( , 1991b;;Schmidt & Wrisberg, 2000) points out, the benefits of (physical) guidance seem to be mainly temporary in nature.Guidance often has strong performance-enhancing effects during practice, when it is present; yet when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests, performance is often less effective than that of learners who practiced the task without or with less”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Schmidt, 1988
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schmidt, 1991b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Schmidt & Wrisberg, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Not yet classified.
Premise§ Attentional FocusIn Wulf, Höß, and Prinz's second experiment, stabilometer learning was enhanced by external focus (markers) relative to internal focus (feet).
“In that experiment, the learning of the stabilometer task was also enhanced by an external focus of attention (markers attached to the board in front of each foot), relative to an internal attentional focus (feet).”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Höß, & Prinz, 1998 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Physical AssistanceWhen poles were removed in retention, the pole group showed no performance decrements in amplitude or force onset; both groups had similar amplitudes in delayed retention, and the pole group showed superior learning in relative force onset.
“More important, though, when the poles were removed in retention, the group that had practiced with the poles showed no performance decrements in amplitude or force onset.Both groups had very similar amplitudes in the delayed retention test, and even more interesting, the pole group demonstrated superior learning with regard to relative force onset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Shea, & Whitacre (1998) source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Summary.Learning of simple tasks may be enhanced by making practice more difficult or challenging, such as by reducing feedback frequency or providing serial/random feedback, whereas learning of complex skills may not benefit and may even be degraded by increasing demands on the learner.
“Together, these results suggest that whereas the learning of simple tasks might be enhanced by making practice more”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
- Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999), learning was more effective with external-focus instructions than internal-focus instructions, and with external relative to internal feedback, even though feedback display was identical.
“The results demonstrated that learning was more effective not only when performers were given external-focus instructions, relative to internal-focus instructions, but also when they were provided”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea & Wulf, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn Wulf, Lauterbach, and Toole (1999), external-focus instructions on club head motion greatly enhanced golf pitch shot accuracy in practice and delayed retention compared with internal-focus instructions on arm swing.
“Here again, the external-focus instructions greatly enhanced the accuracy of the shots in practice and in delayed retention, as compared with the internal-focus instructions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, Lauterbach, & Toole, 1999 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn Singer, Lidor, and Cauraugh (1993), nonawareness strategy and five-step approach focusing on a situational cue resulted in more effective practice performance and immediate dual-task transfer than an awareness strategy focusing on own movements; awareness group was no more effective than control.
“They found that a nonawareness strategy and the so-called fivestep approach, in which performers were instructed to focus on a situational cue (e.g., the center of the target), resulted in more effective practice performance and (immediate) dual-task transfer than did an awareness strategy, in which learners were to focus on their own movements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Singer, Lidor, & Cauraugh, 1993 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn novices, movement form was degraded by internal-focus feedback during practice, but this group caught up with the external-focus group in retention without feedback.
“although the movement form in the novice group was degraded by internalfocus feedback during practice, this group caught up with the external-focus group in the retention test, where the feedback was withdrawn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Attentional FocusThese findings suggest that feedback can induce an external focus of attention, independent of attentional focus instructions, that benefits performance and learning.
“these findings seem to suggest that feedback can have the capacity to induce an external focus of attention, independent of attentional focus instructions, that benefits performance and learning.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusWithdrawal of feedback in retention had no detrimental effect on performance.
“It is also interesting to note that the withdrawal of the feedback in retention had no detrimental effect on performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea & Wulf, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn Riley et al. (1999), touching a curtain significantly reduced postural fluctuation compared with not touching, but only when participants were asked to minimize curtain movements (touch-relevant); when touch was irrelevant, sway was the same as no-touch.
“touching the curtain significantly reduced postural fluctuation,as compared with not touching it, but only when the participants were asked to minimize movements of the curtain resulting from their touch (touchrelevant condition).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Riley, Stoffregen, Grocki, & Turvey, 1999 source
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusIn C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999), feedback generally enhanced performers' ability to maintain balance on the stabilometer relative to no feedback, even though it could be argued redundant with intrinsic feedback.
“the feedback provided to learners in the C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999) study generally enhanced performers' ability to maintain their balance on the stabilometer, relative to no feedback, even though the feedback could have been argued to be redundant with respect to their intrinsic feedback”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea & Wulf, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Not yet classified.
Premise§ Physical AssistanceIn the ski simulator experiment, the pole group produced larger amplitudes than the no-pole group throughout acquisition and demonstrated later relative force onsets, indicating that poles facilitated a more efficient movement pattern.
“As one would expect, the use of poles clearly facilitated performance.That is, the pole group produced larger amplitudes than did the group that practiced without poles throughout the acquisition phase.In addition, the pole group demonstrated later relative force onsets (see Figure 3), indicating that the poles also facilitated the production of a more efficient movement pattern (Wulf, Shea, &”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Physical AssistanceOn the stabilometer task, the poles may have prevented the performer from exploring the perceptual-motor workspace; because of the added support, learners kept the platform on target most of the time, did not experience larger deviations from the goal, and consequently did not learn how to reduce deviations without the poles.
“On the stabilometer task, on the other hand, the poles might have prevented the performer from exploring the perceptual-motor workspace.For example, because of the additional support provided by the poles, learners were able to keep the stabilometer platform”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ Observational LearningThere may be fundamentally more to see and more to be extracted from observation of complex tasks than simple tasks.
“First, there may be fundamentally more to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusPrinz's common coding theory argues there is a common representational medium for perception and action.
“Prinz argued that there is a common representational medium for perception and action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningObservational learning is generally considered not as effective as physical practice, but has been demonstrated to be a viable method of practicing complex motor skills.
“For the most part, observational learning, although generally considered not as effective as physical practice, has been demonstrated to be a viable method of practicing complex motor skills”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedNot yet classified.
Premise§ Attentional FocusHigh-frequency responding is argued to be characteristic of a biological system with more active degrees of freedom, whereas constrained perceptual-motor systems exhibit lower frequency components.
“Highfrequency responding has been argued to be a characteristic of a biologicalsystem with more active degrees of freedom, whereas constrained or compromised perceptualmotor systems exhibit lower frequency components”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Newell & Slifkin, 1996
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusPrinz and colleagues proposed that actions are planned and controlled by their intended effects (action effect hypothesis).
“Prinz and colleagues (Prinz, 1992(Prinz, , 1997;;Prinz, Aschersleben, Hommel, & Vogt, 1995) and Hommel (1997) have taken up James's and Lotze's ideas that actions are planned and controlled by their intended effects (action effect hypothesis; Prinz, 1997).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prinz, 1997 source
Not yet classified.
Premise§ McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesisIn Wulf, McNevin, and Shea (2001), external-focus participants demonstrated lower probe RTs than internal-focus participants, indicating reduced attention demands associated with an external focus.
“External-focus participants demonstrated lower probe RTs than did internal-focus participants, indicating reduced attention demands associated with an external focus.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wulf, McNevin, & Shea, 2001 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesisResearch on focus of attention has been directed only to relatively complex skills.
“In summary, it is important to note that, to date, research on focus of attention has been directed only to relatively complex skills.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningBurwitz (1975) found observation beneficial with a Bachman ladder task (complex) and no differences with a pursuit rotor task (simple).
“This issue is illustrated by Burwitz (1975), who found observation beneficial when he used a Bachman ladder task, a relatively complex task, in one experiment and no differences when a pursuit rotor task, a simple task, was used in another experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burwitz, 1975
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningBecause observers do not execute the movement and do not process direct sensory information, they are not as effective as the model in learning to scale the movement sequence.
“These theorists have argued that because observers do not actually execute the movement and do not process direct sensory information, observers are not as effective as the model, who is physically practicing a skill, in learning to scale the movement sequence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Scully & Newell, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusLotze (1852) proposed that movements are represented by codes of their perceived effects, and the desired outcome guides action to achieve it.
“According to Lotze, movements are represented by codes of their perceived effects, and the desired outcome has the power to guide the action so that this outcome is achieved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lotze, 1852
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesisAccording to the constrained action hypothesis, one advantage of focusing attention on a distant movement effect is that it allows unconscious processes to control movements, resulting in fast adjustments and enhanced performance and learning.
“Thus, one advantage of focusing attention on a (distant) movement effect seems to be that it allows unconscious processes to control the movements required to achieve this effect, resulting in fast movement adjustments and generally enhanced performance and learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McNevin et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Not yet classified.
Premise§ Observational LearningGould (1980) suggested that observation was more effective when the informational load of the task was high (often complex tasks) than when it was low (typical of simple tasks).
“In a similar vein, Gould (1980) suggested that observation was more effective when the informational load of the task was high, which is often the case for complex tasks, than when it was low, which is more typical of simple tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gould, 1980
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Observational LearningEven though observational practice might not be as effective as physical practice in training specific task characteristics, because some types of important processing are unique to physical practice and cannot be developed effectively during observation, observational practice is viewed as a viable training method for teaching general characteristics of complex tasks.
“Thus, even though observational practice might not be as effective as physical practice in training specific task characteristics, because some types of important processing are unique to physical practice and cannot be developed effectively during observation, observational practice is viewed as a viable training method for teaching general characteristics of complex tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationcitation§ McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesisThese results are in line with the view that complex skill learning can be enhanced by reducing attentional and/or motor control demands.
“Thus, these results are in line with the view that complex skill learning can be enhanced by reducing the attentional and/or motor control demands associated with it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusWilliam James (1890) suggested that actions are controlled more effectively if attention is directed to the intended outcome or remote effects rather than close effects such as kinesthetic feedback.
“William James (1890) already had suggested that actions are controlled more effectively if attention is directed to the (intended) outcome of the action, or its”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites James, 1890
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusTodorov et al. showed that learning of table tennis shots was enhanced by concurrent feedback about paddle trajectory relative to expert; participants receiving this feedback were more accurate than those provided verbal feedback on gross errors who hit 50% more balls.
“Todorov et al. showed that the learning of table tennis shots was enhanced by providing performers with concurrent feedback about the trajectory of their paddle (in relation to the paddle trajectory of an expert).Those participants receiving this type of feedback were more accurate in hitting the target than were the participants who were provided verbal feedback (on gross errors) and who hit 50%”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Todorov et al., 1997 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Attentional FocusAccording to common coding theory, efferent and afferent codes can be generated and maintained in a commensurate way only at a distal level of representation.
“According to this view, efferent and afferent codes can be generated and maintained in a commensurate way only at a distant level of representation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Prinz, 1992 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Observational LearningWhen task demands are simple, this memory structuring may not be important, but when demands are high and subcomponents must be integrated, the influence could be much larger.
“When the task demands are relatively simple, this may not be important, but when the demands are high and subcomponents must be properly integrated, the influence could be much larger.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningOther experiments have shown little or no benefit of observation.
“However, other experiments have shown little or no benefit of observation (e.g., Brown & Messersmith, 1948;Burwitz, 1975;Wright, Li, & Coady, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningObservers appear able to extract information necessary to construct appropriate coordination patterns and determine appropriate implementation strategies.
“However, observers appear to be able to extract information necessary to construct appropriate coordinationpatterns (Schönfelder-Zohdi, 1992;Scully & Newell, 1985;Whiting, 1988) and determine appropriate implementation strategies (Kohl & Shea, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Schönfelder-Zohdi, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Scully & Newell, 1985
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Whiting, 1988 source
Not yet classified.
Premise§ McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesisMcNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesis: performers focusing on body movement or close effect tend to actively intervene in control of movements.
“According to this hypothesis, performers focusing on their body movement, or on an effect that occurs in close proximity to their body, tend to actively intervene in the control of their movements.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites McNevin et al., in press
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Not yet classified.
Premise§ Observational LearningBurwitz concluded that the benefits of observation were mediated by task difficulty.
“This led Burwitz to conclude that the benefits of observation were mediated by task difficulty.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burwitz, 1975
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Not yet classified.
Interpretation§ Observational LearningLearning efficiency is especially important for complex skills because they generally take longer to learn, are more physically demanding, carry more risk, and require more specialized equipment or facilities than simple skills.
“The issue of learning efficiency, although relevant to the study of both simple and complex skill learning, is especially important for complex skills, because these skills generally take longer to learn, often are more physically demanding, in many cases introduce the potential for more risk, and generally require more specialized equipment or facilities than do simple skills.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified- Rests on an assumption: Complex skills generally take longer to learn, are more physically demanding, carry more risk, and require more specialized equipment or facilities than simple skills.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ ConclusionsBoth feedback and an external focus of attention improved learning of the stabilometer task.
“Both feedback and an external focus of attention enhanced learning of the stabilometer task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Observational LearningAlternating observational practice with physical practice trials can be quite effective, likely because the observational trials allow information-processing activities that are difficult during a complex, attention-demanding task.
“These findings demonstrate that alternating observational practice with physical practice trials can be quite effective, presumably because the interspersed observational trials give learners the opportunity to perform information-processing activities that they would not be able to do while performing a complex, highly attention-demanding skill.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningIn the Shebilske et al. (1992) and C. H. Shea et al. (2000) experiments, doubling the number of trained participants without increasing time or resources raised training efficiency by at least 100% while not reducing, and sometimes enhancing, learning effectiveness.
“In the experiments by Shebilske et al. (1992) and C. H. Shea et al. (2000), doubling the number of participants trained without an increase in time and other resources led to increases in training efficiency of at least 100%, while not sacrificing, and even enhancing, learning effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Observational LearningGiving learners observational practice during rest intervals would improve training efficiency because two or more learners could be trained in the time previously used for one.
“Providing learners with observational practice during rest intervals-for example, by having them watch a partner perform-would enhance training efficiency, since two (or more) learners could be trained in the same amount of time as one.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor SkillsRandom practice does not seem beneficial for learning more complex tasks or for inexperienced learners.
“Furthermore, random practice, which has often been shown to enhance motor learning when simple tasks were used, does not seem to be beneficial for the learning of more complex tasks (or for inexperienced learners); rather, blocked practice can result in more effective learning in these cases (e.g., Albaret & Thon, 1999;Hebert et al., 1996;J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor SkillsUntil boundary conditions are determined, valid principles and comprehensive theories cannot be developed.
“Until these boundary conditions are determined, valid principles and, thus, comprehensive theories cannot be developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Observational LearningIf physical and observational practice provide distinct processing opportunities that can separately add to learning, then training protocols combining them should be effective.
“If physical and observational practice offer unique opportunities for processing that may independently increment learning, acquisition protocols that combine physical and observational practice should be effective training procedures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premiseown data§ Observational LearningIn the Shebilske et al. AIM dyad study, whole-task test games showed no differences between the dyad and individual training groups; both learned the same amount.
“On test games that required control of the whole task, however, there were no differences between groups-that is, both groups showed the same amount of learning (also see Jordan, 1997, for a meta-analysis).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jordan, 1997
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Observational LearningSimple tasks may benefit less from the reduced processing loads that characterize observational practice.
“Simple tasks, on the other hand, for which cognitive demands tend to be much lower, may not benefit as much from the reduced processing loads characteristic of observational practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Simple motor tasks tend to have much lower cognitive demands than complex tasks.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Observational LearningCombining observation and physical practice can greatly raise learning efficiency without reducing learning effectiveness.
“It is also important to note that combined observation and physical practice protocols have the potential to greatly increase learning efficiency without sacrificing learning effectiveness (C.H. Shea et al., 2000;C. H. Shea et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites C.H. Shea et al., 2000 source
- cites C. H. Shea et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Observational LearningObservational practice requires less physical energy, lowers injury risk, and does not depend on equipment or specific space as physical practice does.
“Clearly, from a personal standpoint, observational practice requires the expenditure of less physical energy, reduces the risk of injury, and is not dependent on equipment or specific space requirements, as in the case of physical practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Observational practice requires less physical energy, reduces injury risk, and is less dependent on equipment or specific space than physical practice.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningIn C. H. Shea et al. (1999), dyad practice caused an initial acquisition decrement relative to individual practice, but dyad participants caught up and tended to be more effective by the end of acquisition.
“Even though there was an initial performance decrement under dyad practice conditions in acquisition, relative to individual practice, the dyad group participants quickly caught up with the individual group participants and even tended to be more effective at the end of the acquisition phase (see Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Observational LearningC. H. Shea et al. (1999) found that practice with a partner was more effective than individual practice.
“The results showed that practice with a partner was more effective than individual practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites C. H. Shea et al., 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ SUMMARY, FUTURE DIRECTIONS, AND CONCLUSIONSIncluding more complex and ecologically valid tasks in research would improve understanding of learning.
“We do believe, however, that the inclusion of more complex and ecologically valid tasks in our research would further enhance our understanding of learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Observational LearningBecause complex skills are generally more attention demanding, the beneficial effects of observational practice should be clearer for complex tasks.
“Thus, since complex skills are generally more attention demanding, the beneficial effects of observational practice should be seen more clearly for complex tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Complex motor skills generally impose higher attention demands than simple motor skills.
The paper relies on this without support.
Learners have a limited amount of processing capacity.
“compete with the essential processing activities for a limited amount of processing capacity during the learning process.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
“In contrast to the simple laboratory tasks used in many studies, reducing relative feedback frequency did not enhance learning of the ski simulator task.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
“Guadagnoli, Dornier, and Tandy (1996) directly demonstrated that task complexity, as well as task-related experience, interacted with the optimal number of trials summarized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Complex motor skills generally impose higher attention demands than simple motor skills.
“Thus, since complex skills are generally more attention demanding, the beneficial effects of observational practice should be seen more clearly for complex tasks.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Simple motor tasks tend to have much lower cognitive demands than complex tasks.
“Simple tasks, on the other hand, for which cognitive demands tend to be much lower, may not benefit as much from the reduced processing loads characteristic of observational practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Complex skills generally take longer to learn, are more physically demanding, carry more risk, and require more specialized equipment or facilities than simple skills.
“because these skills generally take longer to learn, often are more physically demanding, in many cases introduce the potential for more risk, and generally require more specialized equipment or facilities than do simple skills.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Observational practice requires less physical energy, reduces injury risk, and is less dependent on equipment or specific space than physical practice.
“Clearly, from a personal standpoint, observational practice requires the expenditure of less physical energy, reduces the risk of injury, and is not dependent on equipment or specific space requirements, as in the case of physical practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Simple skills can be effectively learned with relatively little practice.
“than for simple skills that can be effectively learned with relatively little practice.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feedback frequency should be reduced as skill increases and functional task complexity decreases, in order to support motor learning.
“Thus, the frequency of feedback should decrease with increasing skill level-that is, with decreasing functional task complexityto further facilitate motor learning (Guadagnoli & Lee, 2004;Timmermans, Seelen, Willmann, & Kingma, 2009;Wulf & Shea, 2002;Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner, 1998).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002
The paper says functional task complexity decreases as expertise develops, and its Feedback frequency section reports that reduced feedback can benefit simpler tasks. But its section on complex skills late in practice treats reducing feedback with increasing experience as a possibility requiring further study, not an established recommendation that it should be reduced to facilitate learning. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredLearners seem to benefit from concurrent feedback especially in very early learning phases because it seems to reduce cognitive load.
“Especially in very early learning phases, learners seem to benefit from concurrent feedback (Todorov et al., 1997) because it seems to decrease cognitive load (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002
The Summary (page unavailable) says that frequent feedback can facilitate learning complex skills with high attentional and memory demands, and reports that concurrent feedback on every trial was most effective for a complex ski-simulator task. It does not establish that concurrent feedback itself decreases cognitive load; the citing sentence attributes the early-learning benefit to Todorov et al., not to Wulf and Shea. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFindings from simple tasks should not be transferred without caution to complex task learning.
“However, one should be careful in transferring conclusions found in studies on simple tasks to complex task learning (Guadagnoli & Lee, 2004;Winstein, 1991;Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002
The effect of augmented feedback depends on task complexity and skill level.
“Applied methods and gained results of related studies have revealed that the impact of augmented feedback depends on task complexity and skill level (Timmermans et al., 2009;Utley & Astill, 2008;Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn early learning, concurrent feedback can prevent cognitive overload and thereby improve learning of complex motor tasks.
“Another reason might be that in an early learning phase, concurrent feedback can prevent cognitive overload and, therefore, enhance learning of complex motor tasks (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002
An external focus is more beneficial than an internal focus for motor learning.
“Since an external focus was stated to be more beneficial than an internal focus for motor learning (Shea & Wulf, 1999;Wulf, 2007a;Wulf & Shea, 2002;Wulf et al., 2010), feedback should be given about a variable that can force an external focus of attention.”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002
Up to now, mostly low-dimensional, simple, artificial labor tasks have been investigated, even though real-life motor tasks are multidimensional and complex.
“Up to now, mostly low-dimensional, simple, and rather artificial labor tasks have been investigated even though, in real life, most motor tasks are multidimensional and complex (Winstein, 1991;Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002
Situations with low processing demands benefit from practice conditions that increase load and challenge the performer, whereas situations with high processing demands benefit from conditions that reduce load to more manageable levels.
“Wulf and Shea (2002) suggest that”
From The Knowledge‐Learning‐Instruction Framework: Bridging the Science‐Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2012) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea (2002)
Complex tasks used in applied settings may be too challenging for information processing and deleterious for learning.
“Complex tasks used in applied settings may be too challenging for information processing ( Hebert et al., 1996 ) and deleterious for learning as a result ( Wulf and Shea, 2002 ).”
From The effect of contextual interference on transfer in motor learning - a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea, 2002
Several studies have shown important interactions between the effectiveness of training interventions, participants' skill level, and complexity of the skill conducted.
“Several studies have shown important interactions between the effectiveness of training interventions, the participants' skill level, and the complexity of the skill conducted.”
From Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces (2015) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea [2002]
Principles derived from the study of simple tasks do not generalize to more complex skills.
“Wulf and Shea [2002] found that principles derived from the study of simple tasks do not generalize to more complex skills.”
From Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces (2015) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea [2002]
When task demands are low, learners benefit from practice conditions that increase total cognitive load; when task demands are high, practice conditions with more manageable workload are beneficial.
“They explained this effect with reference to the learner's total cognitive load: When task demands are low, learners benefit from practice conditions that increase total load, whereas when task demands are high, practice conditions with more manageable workload are beneficial.”
From Supporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces (2015) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea [2002]
Data from other areas of cognitive neuroscience demonstrate that repeating something that you have successfully learned is the best way to remember it.
“Indeed there are data from other areas of cognitive neuroscience that demonstrate that repeating something that you have successfully learned is the best way to remember it (Chiviacowsky and Wulf, 2007; Karpicke and Roediger, 2008; Wulf and Shea, 2002).”
From Rethinking motor learning and savings in adaptation paradigms: model-free memory for successful actions combines with internal models (2011) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea, 2002
Learning motor skills by observing a model is a successful and well-researched instructional technique.
“Learning motor skills by observing a model that performs the desired actions and behavior has been a successful and well researched instructional technique for the last 30 years (McCullagh et al. 1989;Wetzel et al. 1994;Wulf and Shea 2002).”
From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea 2002
By alternating between observation and practice, the mental representation will be enriched.
“By alternating between observation and practice, the mental representation will be enriched (Weeks and Anderson 2000;Wulf and Shea 2002).”
From Interactivity in Video-based Models (2007) · cites this paper as Wulf and Shea 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Practice-trial count conflicts with the figure's trial numbering
MinorThe study is described as having 10 practice trials per day. In Figure 2, however, Day 1 runs from a pretest at Trial 1 through practice at Trial 9, with Day 2 beginning at Trial 10; that leaves only eight numbered practice trials on Day 1.
“that is, 4 days of practice with 10 trials per day.”
“Figure 2. Movement amplitudes of the blocked and serial feedback (FB) groups on the pretest (Trial 1), during practice (Trials 2, 9, 11, 18, 20, 27, 29, 36), and on the no-feedback retention tests of Day 2 (Trial 10), Day 3 (Trial 19), Day 4 (Trial 28), and Day 5 (Trials 37-41)”
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Henry Holt and Company eBooks · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,799 · see citing works
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335 · see citing works
Egeth, H. E., & Kahneman, D. J. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421603 · Cited by 6,976 · see citing works
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466 · see citing works
The co-ordination and regulation of movements
Bernshteĭn, N. A. (1967) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(69)90278-9 · Cited by 6,389 · see citing works
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.121.3.262 · Cited by 6,291 · see citing works
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902 · see citing works
Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis
Schmidt, R. A. (1982) · Cited by 4,813 · see citing works
Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis
Johansson, G. (1973) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212378 · Cited by 4,547 · see citing works
The principles of psychology, Vol I.
James, W. (1890) · doi:10.1037/10538-000 · Cited by 4,514 · see citing works
The co-ordination and regulation of movements
Foley, J. (1968) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-510x(68)90166-4 · Cited by 3,431 · see citing works
Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior
(1997) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(97)90151-6 · Cited by 2,857 · see citing works
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I
Schneider, W. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Cited by 2,228 · see citing works
Society for Neuroscience 2007 abstracts
Wishart, T. M., Paterson, J. M., Short, D. M., Meredith, S., Robertson, K., Sutherland, C. D., Cousin, M. A., Dutia, M. B., & Gillingwater, T. H. (2007) · Cited by 2,094 · see citing works
Perception and Action Planning
Prinz, W. (1997) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/713752551 · Cited by 2,013 · see citing works
What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior.
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.1.3 · Cited by 1,802 · see citing works
(1994) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4561.001.0001 · Cited by 1,741 · see citing works
Stelmach, G. E., & Requin, J. (1980) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)x6078-9 · Cited by 1,705 · see citing works
Baumeister, R. F. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.46.3.610 · Cited by 1,665 · see citing works
A Closed-Loop Theory of Motor Learning
Adams, J. A. (1971) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1971.10734898 · Cited by 1,636 · see citing works
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x · Cited by 1,582 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…it has been suggested that practice conditionsthat promote additional cognitiveeffort (Lee, Swinnen, & Serrien, 1994)or require the learner to engage in additional information-processing activities that are critical for test performance (Schmidt & Bjork, 1992) are most effective for learning.”
BackgroundMotor-output variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts.
Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H. N., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., & Quinn, J. T. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.5.415 · Cited by 1,557 · see citing works
Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355 · Cited by 1,438 · see citing works
The co-ordination and regulation of movements
Assal, G. (1968) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(68)90043-2 · Cited by 1,379 · see citing works
The Timing of Natural Prehension Movements
Jeannerod, M. (1984) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1984.10735319 · Cited by 1,355 · see citing works
Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior
Opstal, A. J. V. (1996) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.385 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill.
Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.5.2.179 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus
Wulf, G., McNevin, N., & Shea, C. H. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/02724980143000118 · Cited by 1,163 · see citing works
Self-citationMemory and Metamemory Considerations in the Training of Human Beings
Bjork, R. A. (1994) · Metacognition · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4561.003.0011 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Wolpert, L., Tickle, C. A., Arias, A. M., Lawrence, P. A., & Locke, J. C. W. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/hesc/9780198800569.001.0001 · Cited by 991 · see citing works
Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, 4th ed.
Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2005) · Cited by 934 · see citing works
Information Processing in Motor Control and Learning
(1978) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-11538-3 · Cited by 916 · see citing works
Adams, J. A., & Welford, A. T. (1970) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421343 · Cited by 862 · see citing works
Journal of Human Movement Studies
D., C. P. (1975) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421916 · Cited by 803 · see citing works
A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning.
Willingham, D. B. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.3.558 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Webster, S. (2018) · doi:10.1002/9781394322084.ch1 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Adams, J. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.41 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
A Common Coding Approach to Perception and Action
Prinz, W. (1990) · Relationships Between Perception and Action · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_7 · Cited by 751 · see citing works
Instructions for Motor Learning: Differential Effects of Internal Versus External Focus of Attention
Wulf, G., Höß, M., & Prinz, W. (1998) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899809601334 · Cited by 740 · see citing works
Self-citationReduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning.
Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
A review of the contextual interference effect in motor skill acquisition
Magill, R. A., & Hall, K. G. (1990) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(90)90005-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
Newell, K. M. (1991) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.001241 · Cited by 681 · see citing works
Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning
McNevin, N. H., Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (2003) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-002-0093-6 · Cited by 626 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Development of Movement Control and Coordination
Kelso, J. A. S., & Clark, J. E. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Free(z)ing Degrees of Freedom in Skill Acquisition
Vereijken, B., van Emmerik, R. E. A., Whiting, H. T. A., & Newell, K. M. (1992) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1992.9941608 · Cited by 581 · see citing works
The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition.
Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.730 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
(1995) · Cited by 482 · see citing works
A Theory of Action Identification
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315802213 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Enhancing the Learning of Sport Skills Through External-Focus Feedback
Wulf, G., Mcconnel, N., Gärtner, M., & Schwarz, A. (2002) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890209601939 · Cited by 435 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Learning Advantages of an External Focus of Attention in Golf
Wulf, G., Lauterbach, B., & Toole, T. (1999) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1999.10608029 · Cited by 420 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In a subsequent study, Wulf, Lauterbach, and Toole (1999) examined the generalizability of the learning advantages of an external focus of attention to the acquisition of sports skills.”
BackgroundSelf-citation20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes
Sanders, A. F. (1980) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61955-x · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis.
Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.2.352 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Summary knowledge of results for skill acquisition: Support for the guidance hypothesis.
Schmidt, R. A., Young, D. E., Swinnen, S. P., & Shapiro, D. C. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.15.2.352 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
The bankruptcy of everyday memory.
Banaji, M. R., & Crowder, R. G. (1989) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.44.9.1185 · Cited by 394 · see citing works
(1983) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)x6079-0 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Relationships Between Perception and Action
Neumann, O., & Prinz, W. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations
Schmidt, R. A. (1991) · Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-3626-6_6 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation
Carr, J. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility
Hommel, B., & Prinz, W. (1997) · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Cognitive Effort and Motor Learning
Lee, T. D., Swinnen, S. P., & Serrien, D. J. (1994) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.1994.10484130 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory
Roediger, H. L., III, Neisser, U., & Winograd, E. (1990) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423218 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Enhancing motor learning through external-focus instructions and feedback
Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (1999) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/s0167-9457(99)00031-7 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Self-citationBaumeister, R. F., & Steinhilber, A. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.1.85 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Attention and Motor Performance: Preferences for and Advantages of an External Focus
Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Park, J.-H. (2001) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608970 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Self-citationAugmented Feedback Presented in a Virtual Environment Accelerates Learning of a Difficult Motor Task
Todorov, E., Shadmehr, R., & Bizzi, E. (1997) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899709600829 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Context Effects in Memory and Learning Movement Information
Shea, J. B., & Zimny, S. T. (1983) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61998-6 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory
Neisser, U., & Winograd, E. (2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Can Forgetting Facilitate Skill Acquisition?
Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62528-5 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Distribution of practice in motor skill acquisition: learning and performance effects reconsidered
Lee, T. D., & Genovese, E. D. (1988) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1988.10609373 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., & Lewthwaite, R. (1994) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1994.10607635 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Gallwey, W. T. (1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Contextual Interference Effects in Learning Three Badminton Serves
Goode, S. L., & Magill, R. A. (1986) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1986.10608091 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Why don't we perceive our brain states?
Prinz, W. (1992) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541449208406240 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Motor learning and performance: A problem-based learning approach
Pringle, R. K. (2000) · Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics · doi:10.1067/mmt.2000.106091 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Henry, F. M., & Rogers, D. E. (1960) · Research Quarterly American Association for Health Physical Education and Recreation · doi:10.1080/10671188.1960.10762052 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Motor learning & performance : from principles to practice
Schmidt, R. A. (1991) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Part-Task Training for Tracking and Manual Control
Wightman, D. C., & Lintern, G. (1985) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872088502700304 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning.
Swinnen, S. P., Schmidt, R. A., Nicholson, D. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.706 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Frequent Feedback Enhances Complex Motor Skill Learning
Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Matschiner, S. (1998) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899809601335 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationContinuous Concurrent Feedback Degrades Skill Learning: Implications for Training and Simulation
Schmidt, R. A., & Wulf, G. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778667979 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Self-citationMotor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice.
Klapp, S. T. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1015 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE EFFECTS WITH SKILLED BASEBALL PLAYERS
Hall, K. G., Domingues, D. A., & Cavazos, R. (1994) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1994.78.3.835 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Button, C., Seifert, L., Chow, J. Y., Araújo, D., & Davids, K. (2021) · Human Kinetics eBooks · doi:10.5040/9781718214125 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Postural stabilization for the control of touching
Riley, M. A., Stoffregen, T. A., Grocki, M. J., & Turvey, M. T. (1999) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/s0167-9457(99)00041-x · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Topics in learning and performance
Thompson, R. F., & Voss, J. F. (1972) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Acquisition of procedural skills from examples.
Anderson, J. R., & Fincham, J. M. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.20.6.1322 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Physical and Observational Practice Afford Unique Learning Opportunities
Shea, C. H., Wright, D. L., Wulf, G., & Whitacre, C. (2000) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890009601357 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Self-citationContinuous Concurrent Feedback Degrades Skill Learning: Implications for Training and Simulation
Schmidt, R. A., & Wulf, G. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315243092-20 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationWulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1989) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.748 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Self-citationContextual interference: Contributions of practice
Shea, C. H., Kohl, R. M., & Indermill, C. (1990) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(90)90076-r · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationInstructions about Physical Principles in Learning a Complex Motor Skill: To Tell or Not to Tell…
Wulf, G., & Weigelt, C. (1997) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1997.10608018 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Self-citationAcquisition of hierarchical control over the temporal organization of a skill.
Pew, R. W. (1966) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0023100 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Toward an action-concept model of stimulus-response compatibility
Hommel, B. (1997) · Advances in psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(97)80041-6 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Interlimb coordination: Learning and transfer under different feedback conditions
Swinnen, S. P., Lee, T. D., Verschueren, S., Serrien, D. J., & Bogaerds, H. (1997) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/s0167-9457(97)00020-1 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Structural factors in patterned finger tapping
Povel, D.-J., & Collard, R. (1982) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(82)90029-4 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning
Schmidt, R. A., Lange, C., & Young, D. E. (1990) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(90)90007-z · Cited by 150 · see citing works
To Be Aware or Not Aware? What to Think about while Learning and Performing a Motor Skill
Singer, R. N., Lidor, R., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1993) · The Sport Psychologist · doi:10.1123/tsp.7.1.19 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.19.5.1134 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationIssues for a Closed-Loop Theory of Motor Learning
Adams, J. A. (1976) · Motor Control · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-665950-4.50009-2 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Optimizing Generalized Motor Program and Parameter Learning
Lai, Q., Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Wright, D. L. (2000) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2000.10608876 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Self-citation(1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511664014 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Enhancing Training Efficiency and Effectiveness Through the Use of Dyad Training
Shea, C. H., Wulf, G., & Whltacre, C. (1999) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899909600983 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationOxendine, J. B. (1968) · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Reduced-Frequency Concurrent and Terminal Feedback: A Test of the Guidance Hypothesis
Park, J.-H., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2000) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890009601379 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationHebert, E. P., Landin, D., & Solmon, M. A. (1996) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10607925 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1998) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899809601322 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning a Partial-Weight-Bearing Skill: Effectiveness of Two Forms of Feedback
Winstein, C. J., Pohl, P. S., Cardinale, C., Green, A., Scholtz, L., & Waters, C. S. (1996) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/76.9.985 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
The Effect of Contextual Variety on the Practice, Retention, and Transfer of an Applied Motor Skill
Wrisberg, C. A., & Liu, Z. (1991) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1991.10607541 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Vander Linden, D. W., Cauraugh, J. H., & Greene, T. A. (1993) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/73.2.79 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Lee, T. D., & Genovese, E. D. (1989) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1989.10607414 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Attention Theory and Mechanisms for Skilled Performance
Schneider, W., & Fisk, A. D. (1983) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)61989-5 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Specificity vs.generality in learning motor skill
Henry, F. M. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Classical studies on physical activity
Brown, R. C., & Kenyon, G. S. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Modeling Considerations in Motor Skill Acquisition and Performance
McCUEEAGH, P., Weiss, M. R., & Ross, D. (1989) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1249/00003677-198900170-00016 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Wulf, G., Lee, T. D., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1994.9941692 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Self-citationWulf, G., & Lee, T. D. (1993) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1993.9941646 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Self-citationRelative Frequency of Knowledge of Performance and Motor Skill Learning
Weeks, D. L., & Kordus, R. N. (1998) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1998.10607689 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Modeling Effects on Motor Performance
Martens, R., Burwitz, L., & Zuckerman, J. (1976) · Research Quarterly. American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation · doi:10.1080/10671315.1976.10615372 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The Effects of Contextual Interference on Females With Varied Experience in Open Sport Skills
Rey, P. D., Wughalter, E. H., & WHITEHURST, M. A. (1982) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1982.10605236 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
The interaction of observational learning with overt practice: effects on motor skill learning
Weeks, D. L., & Anderson, L. P. (2000) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(00)00039-1 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Consistent and Variable Practice Conditions: Effects on Relative and Absolute Timing
Shea, C. H., Lai, Q., Wright, D. L., Immink, M., & Black, C. (2001) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890109603146 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationA Dyadic Protocol for Training Complex Skills
Shebilskem, W. L., Regian, J. W., Arthur, W., & Jordan, J. A. (1992) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/001872089203400309 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
A case of misplaced nostalgia.
Neisser, U. (1991) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.1.34 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Differential effects of task complexity on contextual interference in a drawing task
Albaret, J.-M., & Thon, B. (1998) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00022-5 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Wulf, G., Schmidt, R. A., & Deubel, H. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1134 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationPlanning and Efferent Components in the Coding of Movement
Kelso, J. A. S. (1977) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1977.10735092 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Effects of Contextual Interference on Retention of Three Volleyball Skills
French, K. E., Rink, J. E., & Werner, P. H. (1990) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1990.71.1.179 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Teacher Versus Peer Models: Effects of Model’s Presence And Performance Level on Motor Behavior
Landers, D. M., & Landers, D. M. (1973) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1973.10734958 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE ON LEARNING TECHNICAL SPORTS SKILLS
Bortoli, L., Robazza, C., Durigon, V., & Carra, C. (1992) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1992.75.2.555 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Specificity vs. Generality in Learning and Performing Two Large Muscle Motor Tasks
Bachman, J. C. (1961) · Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation · doi:10.1080/10671188.1961.10762064 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Acquisition of procedural skills from examples.
Anderson, J. R., & Fincham, J. M. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1322 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Motor Schema: The Structure of the Variability Session
Pigott, R. E., & Shapiro, D. C. (1984) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1984.10605353 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Remembering reconsidered: Subject index
Neisser, U., & Winograd, E. (1988) · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Guadagnoli, M. A., Dornier, L. A., & Tandy, R. D. (1996) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10607950 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Retention of simple motor skills as a function of type of knowledge of results.
Lavery, J. J. (1962) · Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0083257 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Movement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation
Girling, B. (1989) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/s0031-9406(10)62811-8 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., Sidaway, B., & Anderson, D. I. (1994) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1994.10607637 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Physical-Guidance Benefits in Learning a Complex Motor Skill
Wulf, G., Shea, C. H., & Whitacre, C. A. (1998) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899809601351 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationOn the Cognitive Processes Underlying Contextual Interference and Observational Learning
Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1994.9941657 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Influence of an unskilled model's practice schedule on observational motor learning
Lee, T. D., & White, M. A. (1990) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(90)90008-2 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Rey, P. D. (1982) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1982.55.1.171 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
The Contextual Interference Effect in Parameter Modifications of the Same Generalized Motor Program
Sekiya, H., Magill, R. A., & Anderson, D. I. (1996) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1996.10607926 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Feedback-Induced Variability and the Learning of Generalized Motor Programs
Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1994.9941691 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationContextual Interference in Motor Learning: Dissociated Effects Due to the Nature of Task Variations
Lee, T. D., Wulf, G., & Schmidt, R. A. (1992) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749208401303 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationBandwidth Knowledge of Results Enhances Generalized Motor Program Learning
Lai, Q., & Shea, C. H. (1999) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1999.10607734 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationEffects of Aging and Schedules of Knowledge of Results on Motor Learning
Swanson, L. R., & Lee, T. D. (1992) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/47.6.p406 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Verbal knowledge of results as redundant information for learning an anticipation timing skill
Magill, R. A., Chamberlin, C. J., & Hall, K. G. (1991) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(91)90016-q · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Cognition in motor learning: Imagery effects on contextual interference
Gabriele, T. E., Hall, C. R., & Lee, T. D. (1989) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(89)90008-0 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
The Contribution of Elaborative Processing to the Contextual Interference Effect
Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Whitacre, C. (1992) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1992.10607554 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Contextual Interference in Learning New Patterns of Bimanual Coordination
Tsutsui, S., Lee, T. D., & Hodges, N. J. (1998) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899809601332 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Contextual interference and motor skill acquisition: On the processes that influence retention
Young, D. E., Cohen, M. J., & Husak, W. S. (1993) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(93)90005-a · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Modeled Timing Information during Random Practice Eliminates the Contextual Interference Effect
Lee, T. D., Wishart, L. R., Cunningham, S., & Carnahan, H. (1997) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1997.10608871 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
An Information-Processing Analysis of Perception and Action
Massaro, D. W. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75348-0_6 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice?
Proctor, R. G. C., & Dutta, A. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.19.4.922 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Gable, C. D., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (1991) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1991.10608725 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Self-citationA Field Test of the Effect of Contextual Variety during Skill Acquisition
Wrisberg, C. A. (1991) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.11.1.21 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Presentation- and test-trial effects on acquisition and retention of distance and location.
Hagman, J. D. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.9.2.334 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Presentation- and test-trial effects on acquisition and retention of distance and location.
Hagman, J. D. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.9.2.334 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Practice schedule effects on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill
Gabriele, T. E., Hall, C. R., & Buckolz, E. (1987) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(87)90019-4 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Yao, W.-X., Fischman, M. G., & Wang, Y. T. (1994) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1994.9941683 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
The Influence of Reminder Trials on Contextual Interference Effects
Shea, J. B., & Titzer, R. C. (1993) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1993.9941647 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Frequency of Modeling Effects on the Acquisition and Retention of a Motor Skill
Sidaway, B., & Hand, M. J. (1993) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1993.10608786 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Applying contextual interference to the Pawlata roll
Smith, P. J. K., & Davies, M. (1995) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640419508732262 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Scheduling Information Feedback to Enhance Training Effectiveness
Nicholson, D. E., & Schmidt, R. A. (1991) · Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193129103501913 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Contextual Interference and Experience in Acquisition and Transfer
Rey, P. D., WHITEHURST, M. A., Wughalter, E. H., & Barnwell, J. (1983) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1983.57.1.241 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice?
Proctor, R. W., & Dutta, A. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.922 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2001) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608929 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationPractice schedule and cognitive style interaction in learning a maze task
Jelsma, O., & Pieters, J. M. (1989) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350030108 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Wright, D. L., Li, Y., & Coady, W. (1997) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1997.10608872 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Contextual Interference: Interactions with Reflection-Impulsivity
Jelsma, O., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1989) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1989.68.3c.1055 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Level of Expertise, Interpolated Activity and Contextual Interference Effects on Memory and Transfer
Rey, P. D., Wughalter, E. H., & Carnes, M. (1987) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1987.64.1.275 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Pew (1966) Revisited: Acquisition of Hierarchical Control as a Function of Observational Practice
Kohl, R. M., & Shea, C. H. (1992) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1992.9941620 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationBenefits of Blocked Over Serial Feedback on Complex Motor Skill Learning
Wulf, G., Hörger, M., & Shea, C. H. (1999) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222899909601895 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationGUIDANCE, RESTRICTION AND KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS
Holding, D. H., & MacRae, A. W. (1964) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140136408930748 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Motor Learning and Performance: A Problem-Based Learning Approach, 2nd Edition
Overdorf, V. G. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200004000-00024 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Wulf, G. (1992) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Self-citationWhy Motor Learning is Ignored: A Case of Ducks, Naughty Theories, and Unrequited Love
Locke, L. F. (2012) · doi:10.1080/00336297.1990.10483985 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The analysis of slalom-ski type movement using a ski-simulator apparatus
den Brinker, B. P. L. M., & Hekken, M. F. V. (1982) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(92)90008-y · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A Dyadic Protocol for Training Complex Skills: A Replication Using Female Participants
Sanchez-Ku, M. L., & Arthur, W. (2000) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872000779698169 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
(1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28 · see citing works
When to Provide Knowledge of Results During Motor Learning: Scheduling Effects
Lee, T. D., & Carnahan, H. (1990) · Human Performance · doi:10.1207/s15327043hup0302_2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE ON LEARNING TECHNICAL SPORTS SKILLS
Bortoli, L. (1992) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.75.5.555-562 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Whitacre, C. A., & Shea, C. H. (2000) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222890009601368 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationStudy of the energy correlates in the learning of a complex self-paced cyclical skill
Durand, M., Geoffroi, V., Varray, A. L., & PREFAUT, C. G. (1994) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/0167-9457(94)90018-3 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
A Note on the Relationship Between Task Requirements and the Contextual Interference Effect
Carnahan, H., Eerd, D. L. V., & Allard, F. (1990) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.1990.10735507 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
EFFECTS OF CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE ON RETENTION OF THREE VOLLEYBALL SKILLS
French, K. E. (1990) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.71.5.179-186 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Effects of contextual interference on children learning forehand tennis groundstrokes
Farrow, D. (1995) · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Object encoding, goal similarity, and analogical transfer
Zamani, M., & Richard, J. (2000) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03198422 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Rate and Force of Guidance in Perceptual-Motor Tasks with Reversed or Random Spatial Correspondence
Holding, D. H., & MacRae, A. W. (1966) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140136608964384 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Type of KR and KR frequency effects on motor learning
Wulf, G., Shea, J. B., & Rice, M. S. (1996) · Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationDeficient Processing in Learning and Performance
Limons, E., & Shea, J. B. (1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)60632-9 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
An Experiment in Teaching Tumbling with and without Motion Pictures
Brown, H. S., & Messersmith, L. (1948) · Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation · doi:10.1080/10671188.1948.10621005 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Joyce, T., & Thorpe, J. (1981) · Journal of the Institute of Mental Subnormality (APEX) · doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.1981.tb00587.x · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Relevance, Application, and the Development of an Unlikely Theory
Hoffman, S. J. (1990) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.1990.10483986 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The influence of motor task types on model effectiveness
Gould, D. R. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The contextual interference effect in learning an open motor skill
Goode, S. L. (1987) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Jordan, J. A., Shebilske, W. L., & Arthur, W. (1997) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Chapter 15 Imitation and the Learning of Complex Cyclical Actions
Whiting, H. T. A. (. (1988) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62565-0 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Response intention and imagery processes: Locus, interaction, and contribution to motor learning
Kohl, R. M., & Fisicaro, S. A. (1996) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00043880 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Féry, Y., & Hofe, A. V. (2000) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712600161826 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
10 of the 213 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Burwitz, L. (1975).Observational learning and motor performance. Paper presented at the FEPSAC Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
- Fitts, P. M., &Posner, M. I. (1967).Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Gabriele, T. E., Lee, T. D., &Hall, C. R. (1991). Contextual interference in movement timing: Specific effects in retention and transfer.Journal of Human Movement Studies,20, 177–188.
- Lotze, R. H. (1852).Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele (Medical psychology or physiology of the soul). Leipzig: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.
- Newell, K. M., &Slifkin, A. B. (1996). The nature of movement variability. In J. Piek (Ed.),Motor control and human skill: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 143–159). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
- Pinto-Zipp, G., &Gentile, A. M. (1995). Practice schedules in motor learning: Children vs. adults.Society of Neuroscience: Abstracts,21, 1620.
- Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B., &Vogt, S. (1995). Handlungen als Ereignisse [Actions as events]. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Eds.),Das Gedächtnis: Probleme—Trends—Perspektiven (pp. 129–168). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Schönfelder-Zohdi, B. G. (1992).Investigating the informational nature of a modelled visual demonstration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138 · see citing works
Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.36.2.212-224 · Cited by 1,534 · see citing works
“…or implicitly, in a variety of sources over many years (notably, Lintern & Gopher, 1978; Marteniuk, 1976; K. M. Newell, McDonald, & Kugler, 1991; Wulf & Shea, 2002).1 As defined by Crick and Koch (2003), “A framework is not a detailed hypothesis or set of hypotheses; rather, it is a suggested…”
BackgroundAugmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 · Cited by 1,416 · see citing works
“Another reason might be that in an early learning phase, concurrent feedback can prevent cognitive overload and, therefore, enhance learning of complex motor tasks (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPaas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1023/b:truc.0000021806.17516.d0 · Cited by 1,054 · see citing works
“…whereas learning situations with low processing demands will benefit from practice conditions that increase the load and challenge the learner, learning situations with an extremely high load will benefit from practice conditions that reduce the load to more manageable levels (Wulf and Shea 2002).”
BackgroundKoedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01245.x · Cited by 772 · see citing works
“A related KLI assumption is that many learning processes and instructional design decisions are not restricted to a domain as whole but are determined by the type of KCs being learned (cf. Sweller & Chandler, 1994; Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundPractice and Play in the Development of Sport Expertise
Côté, J., Baker, J. R., & Abernethy, B. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118270011.ch8 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Learning Versus Performance: An Integrative Review
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615569000 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
“…versus performance distinction and summarize key findings that illustrate the distinction (e.g., R. A. Bjork, 1999; Christina & Bjork, 1991; Jacoby, Bjork, & Kelley, 1994; Kantak & Winstein, 2012; Lee, 2012; Lee & Genovese, 1988; Schmidt & Bjork, 1992; Schmidt & Lee, 2011; Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x · Cited by 602 · see citing works
“Although spaced practice is effective in many areas of motor learning (e.g., Shea & Morgan, 1979), massed practice can be more effective for learning complex motor skills (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
Background- Self-citation
Huang, V. S., Haith, A., Mazzoni, P., & Krakauer, J. W. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.04.012 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
“Indeed there are data from other areas of cognitive neuroscience that demonstrate that repeating something that you have successfully learned is the best way to remember it (Chiviacowsky and Wulf, 2007; Karpicke and Roediger, 2008; Wulf and Shea, 2002).”
Flexible Cognitive Strategies during Motor Learning
Taylor, J. A., & Ivry, R. B. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001096 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
“The type of motor task and nature of the instruction can have varying effects on motor execution and learning [1–3].”
BackgroundExtrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: What is the evidence?
van Vliet, P. M., & Wulf, G. (2006) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280500534937 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
“Wulf and Shea [50,78, 79 ] have argued that, whereas the learning of simple tasks might be enhanced by making practice more difficult or challenging for the learner (e.g., by reducing the feedback frequency), the learning of relatively complex skills might not benefit from, and might even be degraded by increasing the…”
BackgroundSelf-citationvan Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1250 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
“TEACHING SIMPLE VS. COMPLEX TASKS Research indicates that many instructional methods that work well for simple tasks do not work well for complex tasks, and vice versa (for overviews, see Bainbridge, 1997; Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundThe effect of testing on skills learning
Kromann, C. B., Jensen, M. L., & Ringsted, C. (2009) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03245.x · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Motor-skill learning in older adults—a review of studies on age-related differences
Voelcker‐Rehage, C. (2008) · European Review of Aging and Physical Activity · doi:10.1007/s11556-008-0030-9 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
“Complexity and difficulty According to Wulf and Shea [70], a skill is defined as complex if it cannot be mastered in a single session, has more than one degree of freedom, and has the potential to be ecologically valid.”
BackgroundLearning and transfer of complex motor skills in virtual reality: a perspective review
Levac, D. E., Huber, M. E., & Sternad, D. (2019) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-019-0587-8 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
“Hence, principles of learning derived from these simple movement paradigms may not translate into useful transfer-oriented principles for rehabilitation [3].”
BackgroundBuilding a Framework for a Dual Task Taxonomy
McIsaac, T. L., Lamberg, E. M., & Muratori, L. M. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/591475 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
“, the speed-accuracy trade-off), and the demands that are placed on memory and processing capacity [36, 37].”
BackgroundCirstea, C. M., & Levin, M. F. (2007) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968306298414 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
“The research compass”: an introduction to research in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 56
Ringsted, C., Hodges, B., & Scherpbier, A. (2011) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2011.595436 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“However, principles of learning and instruction that are derived from a study among novices might well be quite different and even contrary to those that are suitable for advanced or experienced learners (Wulf & Shea 2002; Haynes 2006).”
BackgroundInstructional Complexity and the Science to Constrain It
Koedinger, K. R., Booth, J. L., & Klahr, D. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1238056 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Motor Learning in Children: Feedback Effects on Skill Acquisition
Sullivan, K. J., Kantak, S. S., & Burtner, P. A. (2008) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20070196 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
The Expertise Reversal Effect is a Variant of the More General Element Interactivity Effect
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2017) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9359-1 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations
Schöllhorn, W. I., Mayer‐Kress, G., Newell, K. M., & Michelbrink, M. (2008) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2008.10.005 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Schema Theory: A Critical Appraisal and Reevaluation
Shea, C. H., & Wulf, G. (2005) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.37.2.85-102 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“The bottom line may be that dealing with parameter variability while trying to formulate a rule for a second independent parameter, or while still formulating the GMP, may be overwhelming from a processing standpoint (see Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSupporting Novice to Expert Transitions in User Interfaces
Cockburn, A., Gutwin, C., Scarr, J., & Malacria, S. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2659796 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
“The results suggest that there is a fine balance between engaging and frustrating users and that training of Wulf and Shea [2002] who observed that principles derived the study of simple tasks may not generalize to more complex skill learning (Section 2.10).”
BackgroundInfluentialLanders, M. R., Wulf, G., Wallmann, H. W., & Guadagnoli, M. A. (2005) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.physio.2004.11.010 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Self-citationConsidering long‐term sustainability in the development of world class success
Güllich, A., & Emrich, E. (2012) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.706320 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
“An amplified and closer-meshed ‘recall-recognition network’ (Wulf & Shea, 2002 ) may assist performance development in two ways.”
BackgroundSelf-Controlled Observational Practice Enhances Learning
Wulf, G., Raupach, M., & Pfeiffer, F. (2005) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2005.10599266 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
“This seems to be the case particularly for relatively complex motor skills (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundSelf-citationSelf-controlled practice enhances motor learning: implications for physiotherapy
Wulf, G. (2007) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.physio.2006.08.005 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationDavids, K., Button, C., Araújo, D., Renshaw, I., & Hristovski, R. (2006) · Adaptive Behavior · doi:10.1177/105971230601400103 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“…of scaling for key variables such as spatial and temporal constraints, include a lower level of intentional constraint on behavior and typically have a reduced amount of perceptual information needed to regulate action (Newell, 1989; Davids, Kingsbury, Bennett, & Handford, 2001; Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundFeedback and motor skill acquisition using a haptic dental simulator
Al‐Saud, L. M., Mushtaq, F., Allsop, M. J., Culmer, P., Mirghani, I., Yates, E., Keeling, A. J., Mon-Williams, M. A., & Manogue, M. R. (2016) · European Journal Of Dental Education · doi:10.1111/eje.12214 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Zhai, S., & Kristensson, P. O. (2012) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/2330667.2330689 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Neuroplasticity promoted by task complexity.
Carey, J. R., Bhatt, E., & Nagpal, A. (2005) · PubMed · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Sonification and haptic feedback in addition to visual feedback enhances complex motor task learning
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Marchal–Crespo, L., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4167-7 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“Since the transfer of conclusions derived from studies on simple, artificial task to complex task learning in sports and rehabilitation is limited (Guadagnoli and Lee 2004; Winstein 1991; Wulf and Shea 2002), it is worth investigating augmented feedback in complex tasks (Krakauer and Mazzoni 2011; Sigrist et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialActivating learning at scale: A review of innovations in online learning strategies
Davis, D., Chen, G., Hauff, C., & Houben, G. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Attentional Focus Effects as a Function of Task Difficulty
Wulf, G., Töllner, T., & Shea, C. H. (2007) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2007.10599423 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
“This is especially important in light of recent findings demonstrating that performance and learning principles developed using a particular difficulty level do not always generalize to other difficulty levels (see Wulf & Shea, 2002, for a review).”
BackgroundSelf-citationBetween-subject variability of muscle synergies during a complex motor skill
Frère, J., & Hug, F. (2012) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2012.00099 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
“As proposed by Wulf and Shea (2002), motor tasks can be qualified as “complex” if they cannot be mastered in a single session.”
BackgroundAn evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training
Spooner, B. B., Fallaha, J. F., Kocierz, L., Smith, C. M., Smith, S. C. L., & Perkins, G. D. (2007) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.017 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
"Seeing the Big Picture": Piano Practice as Expert Problem Solving
Chaffin, R. J. S., Imreh, G., Lemieux, A. F., & Chen, C. (2003) · Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1525/mp.2003.20.4.465 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Comparing continual task learning in minds and machines
Flesch, T., Balaguer, J., Dekker, R., Nili, H., & Summerfield, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1800755115 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
“Interleaving might allow task sets to be constantly reinstantiated from memory, conferring robustness on the relevant representations (15), or amplify category-salient Significance Humans learn to perform many different tasks over the life-span, such as speaking both French and Spanish.”
BackgroundImproving motor performance: Selected aspects of augmented feedback in exercise and health
Lauber, B., & Keller, M. B. (2012) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461391.2012.725104 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Interactivity in Video-based Models
Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9045-4 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Hooren, B. V., Goudsmit, J., Restrepo, J., & Vos, S. B. (2019) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2019.1690960 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“The optimal feedback frequency depends on factors such as the individuals’ experience, difficulty of the skill that needs to be learned and specific feedback that is provided (Lauber & Keller, 2014; Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundRandom versus blocked practice in treatment for childhood apraxia of speech.
Maas, E., & Farinella, K. (2012) · Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0120 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Setting a Research Agenda for Simulation-Based Healthcare Education
Issenberg, S. B., Ringsted, C. V., Østergaard, D., & Dieckmann, P. (2011) · Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · doi:10.1097/sih.0b013e3182207c24 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Context and repetition in word learning
Horst, J. S. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00149 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“Consequently, variability may be less effective for novice learners (for reviews, see Wulf and Shea, 2002; Singh et al., 2008) and more desirable for proficient learners (Zosh et al., 2013).”
BackgroundHolper, L., & Wolf, M. (2011) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-8-34 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“One hypothesis is that the cognitive processing demands may be inherently greater for the learning of complex tasks [44].”
BackgroundVariability of practice as an interface between motor and cognitive development
Pesce, C., Croce, R., Ben-Soussan, T. D., Vazou, S., McCullick, B., Tomporowski, P. D., & Horvat, M. (2019) · International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1612197x.2016.1223421 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
“Thus, the system may be overloaded and the potential benefits of variability of practice disrupted (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundDevelopment of a skill acquisition periodisation framework for high-performance sport
Farrow, D., & Robertson, S. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0646-2 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
“• Can other physical training concepts such as monotony (the mean training load of 558 sessions undertaken during a week divided by the standard deviation) and strain (the 559 sum of the weekly training load multiplied by monotony) [6, 67] be incorporated into 560 the model? 561”
BackgroundInfluentialGiacomino, K., Caliesch, R., & Sattelmayer, M. (2020) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.10129 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2015) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2015.1072506 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
“Directing learners’ focus of attention on external movement outcomes has been found to complement exploration, allow less conscious control of movement, and have a positive effect on learning and performance (Peh, Chow, and Davids 2011; Wulf et al. 2000; Wulf and Shea 2002).”
Cyber-physical postural training system for construction workers
Akanmu, A. A., Olayiwola, J., Ogunseiju, O. R., & McFeeters, D. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103272 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The Science of Workplace Instruction: Learning and Development Applied to Work
Kraiger, K., & Ford, J. K. (2020) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-060109 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Pesce, C., Crova, C., Marchetti, R., Struzzolino, I., Masci, I., Vannozzi, G., & Forte, R. (2013) · Mental health and physical activity · doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2013.07.001 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Kruglikova, I., Grantcharov, T., Drewes, A. M., & Funch-Jensen, P. M. (2009) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2009.191825 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“A general limitation of the above-mentioned studies is that they use simplistic models and their results might not be applicable for more complex tasks and procedures.”
BackgroundSteenbergen, B., van der Kamp, J., Verneau, M., Jongbloed‐Pereboom, M., & Masters, R. S. W. (2010) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.497035 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
“To reiterate, the emphasis on relatively complex tasks is important, because investigations of motor learning in complex skills involving multiple degrees of freedom indicate that the practice interventions that enhance learning of simple skills with only a few degrees of freedom do not convincingly generalise to the…”
BackgroundSigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.1080/00222895.2013.826169 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
“In an early stage of complex task learning, concurrent feedback may accelerate learning by mediating a general idea of the movement (Huegel & O’Malley, 2010; Liebermann et al., 2002) and by preventing cognitive overload (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodThe effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task
Marchal–Crespo, L., van Raai, M. A., Rauter, G., Wolf, P., & Riener, R. (2013) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3690-2 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“Keywords haptic guidance · Visual feedback · Motor learning · timing task”
Does noise provide a basis for the unification of motor learning theories
Schöllhorn, W. I., Beckmann, H., Michelbrink, M., Sechelmann, M., Trockel, M., & Davids, K. (2006) · SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Learner regulated knowledge of results during the acquisition of multiple timing goals
Patterson, J. T., & Carter, M. (2010) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2009.12.003 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
The Contextual Interference Effect and Sport Skills
Brady, F. (2008) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.106.2.461-472 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Jonsdottir, J., Cattaneo, D., Recalcati, M., Regola, A., Rabuffetti, M., Ferrarin, M., & Casiraghi, A. (2010) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968309355986 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Task goals and change in dynamical degrees of freedom with motor learning.
Newell, K. M., Broderick, M. P., Deutsch, K. M., & Slifkin, A. B. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.379 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Bridge, M., & Toms, M. R. (2012) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.721560 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“The second approach to skill development suggested by Wulf and Shea (2002) is one of learning efficiency, where wider developmental issues are considered alongside the development of skill expertise.”
BackgroundThe relationship between habits and motor skills in humans
Du, Y., Krakauer, J. W., & Haith, A. M. (2022) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2022.02.002 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Motor-Based Intervention Protocols in Treatment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS)
Maas, E., Gildersleeve-Neumann, C., Jakielski, K. J., & Stoeckel, R. E. (2014) · Current Developmental Disorders Reports · doi:10.1007/s40474-014-0016-4 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Zulkiply, N., & Burt, J. S. (2013) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0238-9 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Perspectives on human-human sensorimotor interactions for the design of rehabilitation robots
Sawers, A. B., & Ting, L. H. (2014) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-142 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
“While discrete, limited degree-of-freedom tasks are studied for their experimental tractability, sensorimotor coordination and learning principles derived from such movements do not necessarily generalize to complex, multi-joint movements that are often the focus of rehabilitation [62].”
BackgroundShea, C. H., Wulf, G., Whitacre, C. A., & Park, J.-H. (2001) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/713755993 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“Charles H. Shea”
BackgroundSelf-citationKnowledge of Results After Good Trials Enhances Learning in Older Adults
Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Wally, R., & Borges, T. (2009) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2009.10599606 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
“(Wulf & Shea, 2002, pp. 206–207).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing: A Treatment Strategy for Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Strand, E. A. (2019) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2019_ajslp-19-0005 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Basalp, E., Wolf, P., & Marchal–Crespo, L. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2021.3104518 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Hoang, T. N., Reinoso, M., Vetere, F., & Tanin, E. (2016) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/2971485.2971521 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
“Covaci et al. [5] [6, 12, 18] regarding the benefits of concurrent visual feedback to improve error performance for the novice learner in a synchronous learning context.”
BackgroundApfelbaum, K. S., Hazeltine, E., & McMurray, B. (2012) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029839 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Learning of grasp control in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
Duff, S., & Gordon, A. M. (2003) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1017/s0012162203001397 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Eriksson, M., Halvorsen, K., & Gullstrand, L. (2010) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2010.523088 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“The optimal frequency in a multi-trial knowledge of results scheme is unclear and it appears to depend on the complexity of the motion to be learned – a more complex motion is likely to require higher frequency of feedback than a less complex motion (Wulf & Shea, 2002 ).”
BackgroundSleep Enhances Implicit Motor Skill Learning in Individuals Poststroke
Siengsukon, C. F., & Boyd, L. A. (2008) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/tsr1501-1 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Endurance Exercise as an “Endogenous” Neuro-enhancement Strategy to Facilitate Motor Learning
Taubert, M., Villringer, A., & Lehmann, N. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00692 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Given the facts that the mastering of comparably simple skills like tracking does not require high amounts of practice and that it is a part-body movement questions the ecological validity of such findings, especially with respect to whole-body movements (Wulf and Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundLindsay, R. S., Larkin, P., Kittel, A. B., & Spittle, M. (2021) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2021.1991297 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Development of Expertise in Surgical Training
Schaverien, M. V. (2010) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.11.002 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Learning of grasp control in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
Duff, S., & Gordon, A. M. (2003) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2003.tb00884.x · Cited by 81 · see citing works
“Finally, because number of trials (Shea et al. 1990) and level of experience (see Wulf and Shea 2002) influence learning, it is conceivable that the 27 trials in Experiment II were insufficient to allow the participants to form strong internal representations for these novel objects and for one…”
BackgroundLearning a Motor Skill: Effects of Blocked Versus Random Practice a Review
Merbah, S., & Meulemans, T. (2011) · Psychologica Belgica · doi:10.5334/pb-51-1-15 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“According to Wulf and Shea (2002), a task is simple if it has only one degree of freedom, which can be mastered in a single practice session, and if the task appears to be artificial.”
BackgroundOtte, F. W., Millar, S.-K., & Klatt, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2019.00061 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“The practice schedule of movement tasks to manage information complexity The practice schedule describes the number of movement tasks and the order in which they are required to be performed by the athlete (Wulf and Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundA Proposed Framework to Describe Movement Variability within Sporting Tasks: A Scoping Review
Cowin, J., Nimphius, S., Fell, J. W., Culhane, P., & Schmidt, M. W. (2022) · Sports Medicine - Open · doi:10.1186/s40798-022-00473-4 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“Sporting tasks need to be assessed within ecologically valid domains, such as during competition [22, 24, 112].”
BackgroundBoot Camp: A Novel Intensive Approach to Voice Therapy
Patel, R. R., Bless, D. M., & Thibeault, S. L. (2010) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.01.010 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Brydges, R., Carnahan, H., Backstein, D. J., & Dubrowski, A. (2007) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/jmbr.39.1.40-48 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Auditory concurrent feedback benefits on the circle performed in gymnastics
Baudry, L., Leroy, D., Thouvarecq, R., & Chollet, D. (2005) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410500130979 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“Complex motor skills usually require the spatial and temporal coordination of various sub-movements, and therefore the learning principles derived from the study of simple skills may not necessarily be generalizable to complex skill learning (e.g. Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundHelsdingen, A. S., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0022370 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“Increasing interference between training tasks by sequencing different variations of the task randomly (i.e., contextual interference) may enhance posttraining performance (Magill & Hall, 1990; Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundPreparing drivers for dangerous situations: A critical reflection on continuous shared control
de Winter, J., & Dodou, D. (2011) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2011.6083813 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
“Augmented feedback may benefit learning complex motor tasks (timing, balancing, complex sports movements) [61]–[63] and may assist beginners to prevent mental overload [61].”
BackgroundKapnoula, E. C., & McMurray, B. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000123 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Second, and most important, a host of research from automatic motor skill learning has suggested that variability in the training task typically (but not always) leads to more robust acquisition of automatic skills (Magill & Hall, 1990; Shea & Morgan, 1979; Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundAndrieux, M., Danna, J., & Thon, B. (2012) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2012.10599822 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Among the parameters that can be tailored to the learner’s needs during practice, the level of task difficulty seems to be one of the most important (Albaret & Thon, 1998; Choi, Qi, Gordon, & Schweighofer, 2008; Famose, 1990; Wulf & Shea, 2002; Wulf, Töllner, & Shea, 2007).”
BackgroundPractice induces a qualitative change in the memory representation for visuomotor learning
Huberdeau, D. M., Krakauer, J. W., & Haith, A. M. (2019) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00830.2018 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Spacing and induction: Application to exemplars presented as auditory and visual text
Zulkiply, N. B., McLean, J. P., Burt, J. S., & Bath, D. M. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.11.002 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“…induction comes from experiments that compared exact and non-exact repetitions (e.g., Appleton-Knapp, Bjork, & Wickens, 2005; Dellarosa, & Bourne, 1985; Glover & Corkill, 1987; Melton, 1970), and research on motor learning which involved learning complex motor skills (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundDiminished motor skill development in elderly: Indications for limited motor chunk use
Verwey, W. B. (2010) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.001 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Complex motor skills are defined as skills that cannot be mastered in a single session, have more than one degree of freedom, and have the potential to be ecologically valid (Wulf and Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundDistributed practice and procedural memory consolidation in musicians’ skill learning
Simmons, A. L. (2012) · Journal of Research in Music Education · doi:10.1177/0022429411424798 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“…in the context of more complex motor skills (i.e., skills that include multiple degrees of freedom, require multiple practice sessions for skill acquisition, and are often skills people perform outside of laboratories), a category under which music performance inarguably falls (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
BackgroundDistinguishing experts from novices by the Mind’s Hand and Mind’s Eye
Lindstedt, J. K., & Gray, W. D. (2018) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.11.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“Points A and B (above) suggested to us that Tetris would be a fruitful task for advancing cognitive science by following Newell’s injunction to, “accept a single complex task and do all of it” (Newell, 1973), point C suggested that Tetris players, representing a wide-range of skill levels, would be readily available o…”
InfluentialEnhancing Motor Learning Through Dyad Practice
Granados, C., & Wulf, G. (2007) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2007.10599417 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“Observing another performer has been shown to be beneficial for learning (for a review, see McCullagh & Weiss, 2001; Wulf & Shea, 2002), especially for relatively complex skills (Bird, Osman, Saggerson, & Heyes, 2005; Landers & Landers, 1973; Martens, Burwitz, & Zuckerman, 1976; Whiting, 1988).”
BackgroundSelf-citationMovement variability near goal equivalent manifolds: Fluctuations, control, and model-based analysis
Cusumano, J. P., & Dingwell, J. B. (2013) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.07.019 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“…D/T task first facilitated (Brashers-Krug et al., 1996; Krakauer et al., 2006) subsequent learning of the DT task, while learning the DT task first interfered with (Brashers-Krug et al., 1996; Krakauer et al., 2006; Wulf & Shea, 2002) subsequent learning of the D/T task (Smallwood et al., 2012).”
BackgroundEffect of Error Augmentation on Brain Activation and Motor Learning of a Complex Locomotor Task
Marchal–Crespo, L., Michels, L., Jaeger, L., López-Olóriz, J., & Riener, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00526 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wulf, Gabriele
- ORCID
- Wulf, Gabriele
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-211
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2083133776
- Cited by
- 829
- References
- 213
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
- Keywords
- generalizability, processing demands, motor learning, skill acquisition
- MeSH terms
- Attention, Feedback, Generalization, Response, Humans, Motor Skills, Practice, Psychological, Transfer, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review