Cited by 829Motor Control and AdaptationSport Psychology and PerformanceSports and Physical Education Research

Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning

Open access
Wulf, Gabriele, Shea, Charles H.·2002·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

We review research related to the learning of complex motor skills with respect to principles developed on the basis of simple skill learning. Although some factors seem to have opposite effects on the learning of simple and of complex skills, other factors appear to be relevant mainly for the learning of more complex skills. We interpret these apparently contradictory findings as suggesting that situations with low processing demands benefit from practice conditions that increase the load and challenge the performer, whereas practice conditions that result in extremely high load should benefit from conditions that reduce the load to more manageable levels. The findings reviewed here call into question the generalizability of results from studies using simple laboratory tasks to the learning of complex motor skills. They also demonstrate the need to use more complex skills in motor-learning research in order to gain further insights into the learning process.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that motor-learning principles established with simple laboratory tasks often fail to transfer to complex skills. It proposes that low-demand tasks benefit from practice conditions that add challenge, whereas high-demand tasks benefit from conditions that reduce load.

Key findings

  • Contextual interference effects are robust for simple tasks, but complex-skill studies are mixed: random practice sometimes helps, yet blocked practice is often better for novices or high-demand tasks. For example, Albaret and Thon found random practice best for the simplest drawing task, with the advantage shrinking and reversing as segments increased.
  • Feedback effects differ by complexity: reducing feedback frequency usually helps simple skills, but complex tasks can benefit from more frequent feedback. On the ski simulator, 100% feedback produced later relative force onsets in retention than 50% or no feedback; in summary-feedback studies, optimal summary length was 5 trials for a complex simulated batting task versus 15–20 trials in simpler tasks.
  • Feedback organization also differs: blocked feedback about one task component at a time improved complex ski-simulator learning relative to serial feedback, even after 4 days of practice, opposite to simple-task findings favoring random or serial schedules.
  • Physical assistance and observational practice can help complex learning: ski poles improved later force onset and transferred to no-pole retention, while replacing 50% of physical practice with observation preserved retention and improved transfer; dyad training increased efficiency by at least 100% without sacrificing learning.
  • Attentional focus matters mainly for complex skills: external focus instructions or feedback generally enhanced learning relative to internal focus, and in one study 16 participants chose an external focus versus 4 who chose an internal focus.

Methods

  • Narrative review and theoretical synthesis, not a new empirical study.
  • The authors contrast simple tasks (often one degree of freedom, mastered in one session, artificial) with complex tasks (multiple degrees of freedom, not mastered in one session, often ecologically valid).
  • They review studies on contextual interference, feedback frequency and organization, physical guidance/assistance, attentional focus, and observational learning, using tasks such as barrier knockdown, ski simulator, stabilometer, bimanual coordination, and sport skills.

Limitations

  • Stated: task complexity is multidimensional and difficult or impossible to quantify on a single continuum; the authors rely on qualitative judgments to classify tasks as simple or complex.
  • Stated: research using complex motor skills is still relatively sparse, and some complex-skill findings, especially for contextual interference, are mixed or limited.
  • Evident: as a narrative review, it does not use systematic search or meta-analytic synthesis; some cited evidence includes unpublished data and studies with small or specific samples, and the conclusions depend on selected comparisons across different tasks and paradigms.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196276

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

4 of 179 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisereasoning
    § Contextual Interference

    The contextual interference effect has proven to be a fairly robust phenomenon for the learning of simple skills in laboratory situations.

    “Thus, the CI effect has proven to be a fairly robust phenomenon, at least for the learning of simple skills in laboratory situations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    The findings challenge the assumption that a complete understanding of motor-learning processes can be gained by using simple laboratory-type tasks.

    “These findings also challenge the assumption that a complete understandingof motor-learning processes can be gained by using simple laboratory-type tasks”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Adams, 1971 source
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § Title

    Principles derived from studying simple motor skills do not generalize well to the learning of complex motor skills.

    “Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning”
    • Also stated in: § Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas · hedged
      “The findings reviewed here call into question the generalizabilityof results from studies using simple laboratory tasks to the learning of complex motor skills.”
    • Also stated in: § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands · hedged
      “indicating that at least some of the principles that have been found for the acquisition of simple skills do not generalize very well to the learning of more complex skills.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    Development of a movement representation for a more complex skill that requires coordination of many degrees of freedom and may initially be stored as independent subcomponents takes considerably longer and requires more effort and information-processing activities.

    “the development of a movement representationfor a more complex skill that requires the coordinationof many degrees of freedom and may initially be stored as a series of relatively independent subcomponents typically takes considerably longer and inherently requires more effort and informationprocessing activities on the part of the learner.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationreasoning
    § Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

    Some factors have opposite effects on the learning of simple and complex skills.

    “Although some factors seem to have opposite effects on the learning of simple and of complex skills”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 39
  • May combine two claims. 57
  • Not yet classified. 21
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Lower levels of action identity refer to details of the action, while higher levels relate to effects of the action.

    “Lower levels in an action's identity structure refer to the details of the action, such as the specific movements (e.g., striking the correct keys on a piano), whereas higher levels are more related to the effects of the action (e.g., playing the melody).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Vallacher and Wegner's action identification theory proposes a hierarchical order of action identities used in control of action.

    “In their action identification theory, Vallacher and Wegner proposed a hierarchical order of action identities that are used in the control of action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    If a performer selects too low a level of action control, performance is often disrupted.

    “If the performer selects too low a level of action control-for example, because of pressure to perform well-performance is often disrupted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source

      The Performance Impairment section (p. 7) says that controlling an easy or familiar action at too low a level can disrupt it. It does not say disruption occurs often; it also describes pressure to perform well as emphasizing higher-level meanings, rather than as an example of selecting too low a level. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    If lower and higher levels of action identity are available, higher level identities become prepotent.

    “They argued that if lower and higher levels of action identity are available, higher level identities become prepotent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Vallacher & Wegner, 1987 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Contextual Interference

    Random practice is usually more effective than blocked practice for learning simple skills with low memory demands and/or for experienced participants; for complex skills with high memory and processing demands, blocked practice might be more effective, at least early in learning.

    “random practice is usu-ally more effective than blocked practice when it comes to the learning of simple skills, for which the memory demands are relatively low, and/or when participants are experienced to the extent that they have functionally reduced the demands on memory”
    • Also stated in: § Contextual Interference · hedged
      “For the learning of more complex skills for which memory and processing demands are high, blocked practice might be more effective, at least early in the learning process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    Introducing additional demands during complex skill learning may be detrimental because the additional demands compete with essential processing activities for a limited amount of processing capacity.

    “It is conceivable that introducing additional demands for the learner during this process is actually detrimental, rather than beneficial, because the additional demands compete with the essential processing activities for a limited amount of processing capacity during the learning process.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
    • Rests on an assumption: Learners have a limited amount of processing capacity.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contextual Interference

    J. B. Shea and Morgan first demonstrated the contextual interference effect for motor skill learning.

    “J. B. Shea and Morgan (1979) were the first to demonstrate the CI effect for motor skill learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning
    § THEORETICAL AND REVIEW ARTICLES

    Functional task complexity changes as a result of expertise, and as an individual develops expertise with a task, the functional complexity of the task decreases.

    “functional task complexity changes as a result of expertise.”
    • Also stated in: § THEORETICAL AND REVIEW ARTICLES · plain
      “as an individual performer develops expertise with a task, the functional complexity of the task decreases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Adams, 1976 source
    • cites Schneider & Shiffrin, 1977 source
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Contextual Interference

    Smith and Davies found benefits of high contextual interference practice for learning the Pawlata kayak roll, and Wrisberg and colleagues found that alternating different serves produced more effective learning than blocked practice.

    “One study that found benefits of high-CI practice for the learning of a sport skill is a study by Smith and Davies (1995), who used the Pawlata kayak roll.”
    • Also stated in: § Contextual Interference
      “Wrisberg and colleagues (Wrisberg, 1991;Wrisberg & Liu, 1991) have found additional convincing evidence for the greater effectiveness of practice conditions that included frequent changes between tasks.In both studies, alternating different serves produced more effective learning than did blocked practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Smith & Davies, 1995 source
    • cites Wrisberg, 1991

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wrisberg & Liu, 1991 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    A random practice order exercises retrieval processes that later facilitate test performance and requires more effort than blocked practice, so performance at test is usually enhanced.

    “because a random practice order of different tasks exercises retrieval processes that later facilitate test performanceand therefore requires more effort than does blocked practice-performance at the time of the test is usually enhanced”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Magill & Hall, 1990 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Contextual Interference

    The learning advantages of random over blocked practice have been replicated in numerous laboratory experiments since J. B. Shea and Morgan.

    “Since the J. B. Shea and Morgan (1979) study, the learning advantages of random, as compared with blocked, practice have been replicated in numerous laboratory experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

    In situations with low processing demands, practice conditions that increase load and challenge the performer benefit learning; in situations with extremely high load, conditions that reduce load to manageable levels benefit learning.

    “situations with low processing demands benefit from practice conditions that increase the load and challenge the performer, whereas practice conditions that result in extremely high load should benefit from conditions that reduce the load to more manageable levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    Complex skill learning might be enhanced by providing practice conditions that facilitate performance until a relatively stable movement representation is acquired.

    “complex skill learning might be enhanced by providing the learner with practice conditions that facilitate performance (at least until a relatively stable movement presentation is acquired).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    For relatively simple skills, a rough movement representation may be developed within a few practice trials, and further refinement of the skill depends on the extent to which the learner is challenged by practice conditions.

    “For relatively simple skills, a rough movement representation may be developed within a few practice trials, and it is easy to see that a further refinement of the skill is dependent on the extent to which the learner is challenged by the practice conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    The tasks used to examine effects of variables on motor learning have generally been relatively simple, often involving one degree of freedom, requiring small amounts of practice to reach asymptotes, and placing modest demands on attention, memory, and processing.

    “In general, however, the tasks used to examine the effects of these variables on learning have been relatively simpleoften including only one degree of freedom, requiring comparatively small amounts of practice to reach performance asymptotes, and placing relatively modest demands on attention,memory, and/or processing capacity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    Making augmented feedback difficult to use, for example by delaying it or withholding it on some practice trials, is beneficial for test performance because it forces learners to develop their own internal error-correction and error-detection mechanisms.

    “making augmented feedback difficult to use-for example, by delaying it or by withholdingit on some practice trials-has been argued to be beneficial for test performance because it forces learners to develop their own internal error-correction-and-detection mechanisms”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt, 1991a source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    Practice conditions that promote additional cognitive effort or require additional information-processing activities critical for test performance are most effective for learning simple skills.

    “practice conditions that promote additional cognitive effort (Lee, Swinnen, & Serrien, 1994) or require the learner to engage in additionalinformation-processing activities that are critical for test performance (Schmidt & Bjork, 1992) are most effective for learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lee, Swinnen, & Serrien, 1994 source
    • cites Schmidt & Bjork, 1992 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Cognitive Effort and Information-Processing Demands

    Complex skills may be sensitive to variables that are not particularly relevant for simple skills.

    “it is also possible that complex skills are sensitive to variables that are not particularly relevant for simple skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Contextual Interference

    The contextual interference effect has been demonstrated fairly consistently for relatively simple laboratory tasks, but this does not seem to be the case for more complex skills.

    “whereas the CI effect has been demonstrated fairly consistently for relatively simple laboratory tasks, this does not seem to be the case for more complex skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Feedback frequency.

    Delaying feedback for a few seconds produces more effective learning than giving feedback immediately after or concurrently with the movement.

    “delaying the feedback for a few seconds has been found to produce more effective learning than does giving feedback immediately after or even concurrently with the movement”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt & Wulf, 1997 source
    • cites Swinnen, Schmidt, Nicholson, & Shapiro, 1990 source
    • cites Vander Linden, Cauraugh, & Greene, 1993 source
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Contextual Interference

    Recent experiments consistently found relative timing advantages for constant and blocked practice relative to serial and random practice, directly opposite the typical contextual interference effect.

    “a number of recent experiments (e.g., Lai & Shea, 1998, 1999;Lai, Shea, Wulf, & Wright, 2000;C. H. Shea, Lai, Wright, Immink, & Black, 2001;Whitacre & Shea, 2000) consistently found relative timing advantages for constant and blocked practice, relative to serial and random practice, directly opposite the typical CI effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lai & Shea, 1998, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Lai, Shea, Wulf, & Wright, 2000 source
    • cites C. H. Shea, Lai, Wright, Immink, & Black, 2001 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    In animal conditioning, partial reinforcement slows acquisition but maintains learning for much longer than continuous reinforcement does.

    “partial reinforcement has been shown to slow acquisition but also to maintain learning for much longer than continuous reinforcement does.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Tarpy, 1982
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Contextual Interference

    Wright, Li, and Whitacre found that additional processing disrupted learning under random-practice conditions but had positive effects under blocked conditions.

    “Wright, Li, and Whitacre (1992; also see Lee, Wishart, Cunningham, & Carnahan, 1997) found that additional processing disrupted learning under random-practice conditions but had positive effects under blocked conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wright, Li, & Whitacre, 1992 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    Beneficial learning effects of reduced feedback in humans are seen not only in no-feedback retention tests but also in 100% feedback retention tests, which argues against the extinction explanation.

    “one set of findings that argues against such an explanation for human learning is that beneficial learning effects of reduced feedback are seen not only in no-feedback retention tests, but also in 100% feedback retention tests.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Winstein & Schmidt, 1990 source
    • cites Wulf & Schmidt, 1989 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Feedback frequency.

    Contrary to simple tasks in which reducing relative feedback frequency is more beneficial, learning of the more complex ski simulator task was enhanced by 100% feedback.

    “Thus, contrary to studies that used more simple tasks in which reducing the relative feedback frequency was more beneficial for learning than was providing learners with feedback after or during every practice trial (e.g., Schmidt & Wulf, 1997;Winstein & Schmidt, 1990;Wulf & Schmidt, 1989;Wulf et al., 1993), the learning of this more complex task was enhanced by 100% feedback.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt & Wulf, 1997 source
    • cites Winstein & Schmidt, 1990 source
    • cites Wulf & Schmidt, 1989 source
    • Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    In that study, only the 100% feedback group was significantly more effective than the control group, while the 50% group did not differ significantly from either group.

    “Furthermore, only the 100% group was significantly more effective than the control group, whereas the 50% group did not differ significantly from either group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner (1998) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    For a more complex simulated batting task, the optimal number of summary trials was lower than for simpler tasks, with a 5-trial summary being more beneficial than 15-trial or 1-trial summaries.

    “Schmidt, Lange, and Young (1990) showed that the optimal number of summary trials for a more complex simulated batting task was lower than those found for more simple tasks.In this case, a summary of 5 trials was more beneficial than longer (15) or shorter (1) feedback summaries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt, Lange, and Young (1990) source
  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Feedback frequency.

    The principles underlying animal reinforcement and feedback in humans have some similarities but also important differences.

    “This suggests that although the principles underlying animal reinforcement and feedback in humans have some similarities, they show some important differences as well.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Feedback frequency.

    The advantage of 100% feedback occurred even though the feedback was continuous and concurrent.

    “Interestingly, this advantage occurred even though the feedback given in the Wulf, Shea, and Matschiner (1998) study was continuous and concurrent.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Shea, and Matschiner (1998) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Contextual Interference

    Complex tasks requiring considerably more memory capacity per task may exceed the performer's capacity, especially early in practice when a single complex task may initially be stored as a series of subcomponents.

    “complex tasks, presumably requiring considerably more memory capacity per task, may exceed the capacity of the performer.This may be especially true early in practice, where a single complex task may be initially stored as a series of subcomponents”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Povel & Collard, 1982 source
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Feedback frequency.

    Learning of simple skills tends to improve when augmented feedback is reduced or delayed, although this effect is stronger under variable practice conditions.

    “Although the learning of simple skills seems to benefit from reducing or delaying the augmented feedback (although this effect appears to be stronger for variable practice conditions; see Lai & Shea, 1998)”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lai & Shea, 1998 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    In the ski simulator study, during delayed retention the 100% feedback group improved across trials, the 50% feedback group showed no gains, and the control group showed a performance decrement.

    “However, the group that had received the most feedback (100%) during practice showed a clear performance improvement across trials, whereas the 50% feedback group showed no such performance gains, and the control group even demonstrated a performance decrement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner (1998) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    Long feedback summaries benefited learning of a relatively simple striking task for both novices and experienced participants, and benefited a more complex double-striking task for experienced participants, but single-trial feedback was more effective than longer summaries for novices learning a complex task.

    “whereas relatively long feedback summaries benefited the learning of a relatively simple striking task for both novice and experienced participants, as well as the learning of a more complex double-striking task for experienced participants, single-trial feedback was more effective than longer feedback summaries for novices trying to learn a complex task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Guadagnoli et al. (1996) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    The 100% feedback group developed a more effective error-detection-and-correction mechanism than the 50% and no-feedback conditions, enabling further performance improvements without feedback.

    “Rather, it seems that the participants in the 100% feedback group developed a more effective error-detection-and-correction mechanism (e.g., Salmoni et al., 1984;Schmidt, 1991a), as compared with the 50% feedback and no-feedback (control) conditions, which enabled them to demonstrate further performance improvements even in the absence of feedback.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Salmoni et al., 1984 source
    • cites Schmidt, 1991a source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given
    § Feedback frequency.

    Immediate reinforcement is more effective than delayed reinforcement in animal learning, but this is not the case for skill learning in humans.

    “immediate reinforcement is more effective than delayed reinforcement in animal learning, but this is not the case for skill learning in humans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data
    § Feedback frequency.

    In that experiment, the beneficial effects of blocked practice appeared in amplitude, while there were no significant group differences in force onset.

    “In this experiment, the beneficial effects of blocked practice were seen in amplitude, whereas there were no significant group differences in force onset (even though feedback was given about force onset, as in Wulf & Bühner, 1996)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Hörger, and Shea (1999) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Feedback frequency.

    Concurrent feedback typically has strong performance-enhancing effects during practice but results in clear performance decrements relative to postresponse feedback when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests.

    “concurrent feedback typically has strong performance-enhancing effects during practice, but results in clear performance decrements, relative to postresponse feedback, when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt & Wulf, 1997 source
    • cites Vander Linden et al., 1993 source
    • cites Winstein et al., 1996 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § VARIABLES INFLUENCING MAINLY COMPLEX SKILL LEARNING

    Observational practice seems to have clear benefits for more complex skills.

    “it seems to have clear benefits for more complex skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § Attentional Focus

    A number of studies have demonstrated that the performer's focus of attention can have a decisive influence on performance and learning.

    “A number of studies have demonstrated that the performer's focus of attention can have a decisive influence on performance and learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Summary.

    The negative effects thought to be associated with the guidance provided by frequent feedback appear to be reduced in complex tasks.

    “That is, the negative effects thought to be associated with the guidance provided by frequent feedback seem to be reduced.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Physical Assistance

    For complex movements with many degrees of freedom, there may be advantages to using physical assistance procedures, supporting the view that complex skill learning benefits from reducing demands on the learner.

    “For complex movements with many degrees of freedom, such as those encountered in many sports situations, there might actually be advantages to using physical assistance procedures, corroborating the view that complex skill learning benefits from reducing the demands imposed on the learner.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
    • Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Physical Assistance

    The benefits in force onset provided by the poles during practice were not only temporary; they transferred to a no-pole situation and were relatively permanent, meaning the poles enhanced learning of a more efficient movement pattern relative to practice without poles.

    “Thus, the benefits in force onset provided by the poles during practice were not only temporary effects.Rather, these benefits transferred to a situation in which no poles could be used, and they were relatively permanent in nature; that is, the poles enhanced the learning of a more efficient movement pattern, relative to practice without poles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § VARIABLES INFLUENCING MAINLY COMPLEX SKILL LEARNING

    Some principles or phenomena relevant to complex skill learning may be less powerful or may not appear in simple laboratory tasks.

    “some principles or phenomena that could be relevant for the learning of complex skills might be less powerful or might not show up in tasks such as those typically used in the laboratory.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Physical Assistance

    Physical assistance may be conducive to learning to the extent that it allows the learner to explore the perceptual-motor workspace.

    “It is conceivable that physical assistance is conducive to learning to the extent that it allows the learner to explore the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Newell, 1991 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In Wulf and Weigelt's ski simulator experiment, instructions to delay forcing the platform until after the center did not enhance learning and were detrimental to practice and stress transfer relative to no instructions.

    “Wulf and Weigelt found that the instructions did not enhance the learning of this task; rather, they were detrimental to performance during practice and transfer to a”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf & Weigelt, 1997 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § VARIABLES INFLUENCING MAINLY COMPLEX SKILL LEARNING

    A characteristic of complex motor skills that is difficult to simulate with simple tasks is that the performer can direct attention to various aspects of the task.

    “One characteristic of complex motor skills that is difficult to simulate with simple tasks is that the performer can direct his or her attention to various aspects of the task.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Physical Assistance

    On the ski simulator, the poles may have enabled learners to experience that shifting weight from the outer to the inner foot relatively late is more effective; this experience shortened the learning process and allowed learners to reach a given performance level in less time.

    “On the ski simulator, the poles might have enabled learners to experience (consciouslyor unconsciously) that it is more effective to shift the weight from the outer to the inner foot relatively late-that is, to delay the force onset of the inner foot.This experience provided by the poles served to shorten the learning process and enabled the learners to reach a given level of performance in less”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In Wulf, Höß, and Prinz (1998, Experiment 1), external focus on wheels was more effective for producing large movement amplitudes than internal focus on feet in both practice and retention, and internal focus was not different from control.

    “The results indicated that the latter condition was much more effective for the production of large movement amplitudes than was the internal focus condition in both practice and retention, which was not different from a control condition without additional instructions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Höß, & Prinz, 1998 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Todorov, Shadmehr, and Bizzi (1997) argued that the highest level of motor planning and control is in terms of kinematics of the end-effector, so feedback should be most effective if it represents end-effector movements rather than body movements.

    “Todorov et al. argued that the highest level of motor planning and control seems to be in terms of the kinematics of the endeffector and that, therefore, the feedback given to the learner should be most effective if it represents the movements of the end-effector, rather than the body movements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Todorov, Shadmehr, & Bizzi, 1997 source
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In Wulf, Shea, and Park (2001), a considerably greater number of participants chose external focus on markers (n=16) rather than internal focus on feet (n=4); those choosing markers were clearly more effective in retention than those focusing on feet.

    “A considerably greater number of participants chose to focus on the markers that were located in front of their feet (n = 16), rather than on the feet themselves (n = 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Shea, & Park, 2001 source
  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Summary.

    Feedback in complex tasks is generally less prescriptive than in many simple tasks, because complex tasks often require coordination of different components, making it difficult for a single feedback measure to be truly prescriptive.

    “It should also be noted, however, that feedback in complex tasks is generally not as prescriptive as it often is in many of the simple tasks that have been used in this context.In complex tasks, there are often different components that have to be coordinated to produce skilled performance, making it much more difficult for a single feedback measure to be truly prescriptive.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    The advantage in movement outcome was not accomplished at the expense of movement form; expert ratings showed both feedback types led to similar improvements in form.

    “Furthermore, this advantage in the movement outcome was not accomplished at the expense of movement form.As was determined through expert ratings, both types of feedback led to similar improvements in form.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf et al., in press

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Physical Assistance

    These results suggest that there may be limits to the generalizability of findings from studies using typical laboratory tasks with few degrees of freedom.

    “These results again suggest that there may be limitations to the generalizabilityof findings from studies using typical laboratory tasks with few degrees of freedom.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
    • Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
    • Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Physical Assistance

    The benefits of physical guidance appear to be mainly temporary: guidance often enhances performance during practice, but when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests, performance is often less effective than that of learners who practiced without or with less guidance.

    “As Schmidt (1988Schmidt ( , 1991b;;Schmidt & Wrisberg, 2000) points out, the benefits of (physical) guidance seem to be mainly temporary in nature.Guidance often has strong performance-enhancing effects during practice, when it is present; yet when it is withdrawn in retention or transfer tests, performance is often less effective than that of learners who practiced the task without or with less”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt, 1988

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Schmidt, 1991b

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Schmidt & Wrisberg, 2000

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Attentional Focus

    In Wulf, Höß, and Prinz's second experiment, stabilometer learning was enhanced by external focus (markers) relative to internal focus (feet).

    “In that experiment, the learning of the stabilometer task was also enhanced by an external focus of attention (markers attached to the board in front of each foot), relative to an internal attentional focus (feet).”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Höß, & Prinz, 1998 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Physical Assistance

    When poles were removed in retention, the pole group showed no performance decrements in amplitude or force onset; both groups had similar amplitudes in delayed retention, and the pole group showed superior learning in relative force onset.

    “More important, though, when the poles were removed in retention, the group that had practiced with the poles showed no performance decrements in amplitude or force onset.Both groups had very similar amplitudes in the delayed retention test, and even more interesting, the pole group demonstrated superior learning with regard to relative force onset.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Shea, & Whitacre (1998) source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Summary.

    Learning of simple tasks may be enhanced by making practice more difficult or challenging, such as by reducing feedback frequency or providing serial/random feedback, whereas learning of complex skills may not benefit and may even be degraded by increasing demands on the learner.

    “Together, these results suggest that whereas the learning of simple tasks might be enhanced by making practice more”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.
    • Rests on an assumption: Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999), learning was more effective with external-focus instructions than internal-focus instructions, and with external relative to internal feedback, even though feedback display was identical.

    “The results demonstrated that learning was more effective not only when performers were given external-focus instructions, relative to internal-focus instructions, but also when they were provided”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites C. H. Shea & Wulf, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In Wulf, Lauterbach, and Toole (1999), external-focus instructions on club head motion greatly enhanced golf pitch shot accuracy in practice and delayed retention compared with internal-focus instructions on arm swing.

    “Here again, the external-focus instructions greatly enhanced the accuracy of the shots in practice and in delayed retention, as compared with the internal-focus instructions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Lauterbach, & Toole, 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In Singer, Lidor, and Cauraugh (1993), nonawareness strategy and five-step approach focusing on a situational cue resulted in more effective practice performance and immediate dual-task transfer than an awareness strategy focusing on own movements; awareness group was no more effective than control.

    “They found that a nonawareness strategy and the so-called fivestep approach, in which performers were instructed to focus on a situational cue (e.g., the center of the target), resulted in more effective practice performance and (immediate) dual-task transfer than did an awareness strategy, in which learners were to focus on their own movements.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singer, Lidor, & Cauraugh, 1993 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In novices, movement form was degraded by internal-focus feedback during practice, but this group caught up with the external-focus group in retention without feedback.

    “although the movement form in the novice group was degraded by internalfocus feedback during practice, this group caught up with the external-focus group in the retention test, where the feedback was withdrawn.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf et al., in press

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Attentional Focus

    These findings suggest that feedback can induce an external focus of attention, independent of attentional focus instructions, that benefits performance and learning.

    “these findings seem to suggest that feedback can have the capacity to induce an external focus of attention, independent of attentional focus instructions, that benefits performance and learning.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Withdrawal of feedback in retention had no detrimental effect on performance.

    “It is also interesting to note that the withdrawal of the feedback in retention had no detrimental effect on performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites C. H. Shea & Wulf, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In Riley et al. (1999), touching a curtain significantly reduced postural fluctuation compared with not touching, but only when participants were asked to minimize curtain movements (touch-relevant); when touch was irrelevant, sway was the same as no-touch.

    “touching the curtain significantly reduced postural fluctuation,as compared with not touching it, but only when the participants were asked to minimize movements of the curtain resulting from their touch (touchrelevant condition).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Riley, Stoffregen, Grocki, & Turvey, 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    In C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999), feedback generally enhanced performers' ability to maintain balance on the stabilometer relative to no feedback, even though it could be argued redundant with intrinsic feedback.

    “the feedback provided to learners in the C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999) study generally enhanced performers' ability to maintain their balance on the stabilometer, relative to no feedback, even though the feedback could have been argued to be redundant with respect to their intrinsic feedback”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites C. H. Shea & Wulf, 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Physical Assistance

    In the ski simulator experiment, the pole group produced larger amplitudes than the no-pole group throughout acquisition and demonstrated later relative force onsets, indicating that poles facilitated a more efficient movement pattern.

    “As one would expect, the use of poles clearly facilitated performance.That is, the pole group produced larger amplitudes than did the group that practiced without poles throughout the acquisition phase.In addition, the pole group demonstrated later relative force onsets (see Figure 3), indicating that the poles also facilitated the production of a more efficient movement pattern (Wulf, Shea, &”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, Shea, & Whitacre (1998) source
    • cites Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner, 1998 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Physical Assistance

    On the stabilometer task, the poles may have prevented the performer from exploring the perceptual-motor workspace; because of the added support, learners kept the platform on target most of the time, did not experience larger deviations from the goal, and consequently did not learn how to reduce deviations without the poles.

    “On the stabilometer task, on the other hand, the poles might have prevented the performer from exploring the perceptual-motor workspace.For example, because of the additional support provided by the poles, learners were able to keep the stabilometer platform”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Observational Learning

    There may be fundamentally more to see and more to be extracted from observation of complex tasks than simple tasks.

    “First, there may be fundamentally more to”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Prinz's common coding theory argues there is a common representational medium for perception and action.

    “Prinz argued that there is a common representational medium for perception and action.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Prinz, 1990 source
    • cites Prinz, 1997 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    Observational learning is generally considered not as effective as physical practice, but has been demonstrated to be a viable method of practicing complex motor skills.

    “For the most part, observational learning, although generally considered not as effective as physical practice, has been demonstrated to be a viable method of practicing complex motor skills”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Bachman, 1961 source
    • cites Landers & Landers, 1973 source
    • cites Martens, Burwitz, & Zuckerman, 1976 source
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Attentional Focus

    High-frequency responding is argued to be characteristic of a biological system with more active degrees of freedom, whereas constrained perceptual-motor systems exhibit lower frequency components.

    “Highfrequency responding has been argued to be a characteristic of a biologicalsystem with more active degrees of freedom, whereas constrained or compromised perceptualmotor systems exhibit lower frequency components”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Newell & Slifkin, 1996

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Prinz and colleagues proposed that actions are planned and controlled by their intended effects (action effect hypothesis).

    “Prinz and colleagues (Prinz, 1992(Prinz, , 1997;;Prinz, Aschersleben, Hommel, & Vogt, 1995) and Hommel (1997) have taken up James's and Lotze's ideas that actions are planned and controlled by their intended effects (action effect hypothesis; Prinz, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Prinz, 1997 source
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesis

    In Wulf, McNevin, and Shea (2001), external-focus participants demonstrated lower probe RTs than internal-focus participants, indicating reduced attention demands associated with an external focus.

    “External-focus participants demonstrated lower probe RTs than did internal-focus participants, indicating reduced attention demands associated with an external focus.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wulf, McNevin, & Shea, 2001 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given
    § McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesis

    Research on focus of attention has been directed only to relatively complex skills.

    “In summary, it is important to note that, to date, research on focus of attention has been directed only to relatively complex skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    Burwitz (1975) found observation beneficial with a Bachman ladder task (complex) and no differences with a pursuit rotor task (simple).

    “This issue is illustrated by Burwitz (1975), who found observation beneficial when he used a Bachman ladder task, a relatively complex task, in one experiment and no differences when a pursuit rotor task, a simple task, was used in another experiment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burwitz, 1975

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    Because observers do not execute the movement and do not process direct sensory information, they are not as effective as the model in learning to scale the movement sequence.

    “These theorists have argued that because observers do not actually execute the movement and do not process direct sensory information, observers are not as effective as the model, who is physically practicing a skill, in learning to scale the movement sequence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Scully & Newell, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Lotze (1852) proposed that movements are represented by codes of their perceived effects, and the desired outcome guides action to achieve it.

    “According to Lotze, movements are represented by codes of their perceived effects, and the desired outcome has the power to guide the action so that this outcome is achieved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lotze, 1852

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesis

    According to the constrained action hypothesis, one advantage of focusing attention on a distant movement effect is that it allows unconscious processes to control movements, resulting in fast adjustments and enhanced performance and learning.

    “Thus, one advantage of focusing attention on a (distant) movement effect seems to be that it allows unconscious processes to control the movements required to achieve this effect, resulting in fast movement adjustments and generally enhanced performance and learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McNevin et al., in press

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Observational Learning

    Gould (1980) suggested that observation was more effective when the informational load of the task was high (often complex tasks) than when it was low (typical of simple tasks).

    “In a similar vein, Gould (1980) suggested that observation was more effective when the informational load of the task was high, which is often the case for complex tasks, than when it was low, which is more typical of simple tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gould, 1980

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Observational Learning

    Even though observational practice might not be as effective as physical practice in training specific task characteristics, because some types of important processing are unique to physical practice and cannot be developed effectively during observation, observational practice is viewed as a viable training method for teaching general characteristics of complex tasks.

    “Thus, even though observational practice might not be as effective as physical practice in training specific task characteristics, because some types of important processing are unique to physical practice and cannot be developed effectively during observation, observational practice is viewed as a viable training method for teaching general characteristics of complex tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesis

    These results are in line with the view that complex skill learning can be enhanced by reducing attentional and/or motor control demands.

    “Thus, these results are in line with the view that complex skill learning can be enhanced by reducing the attentional and/or motor control demands associated with it.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    William James (1890) suggested that actions are controlled more effectively if attention is directed to the intended outcome or remote effects rather than close effects such as kinesthetic feedback.

    “William James (1890) already had suggested that actions are controlled more effectively if attention is directed to the (intended) outcome of the action, or its”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites James, 1890

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    Todorov et al. showed that learning of table tennis shots was enhanced by concurrent feedback about paddle trajectory relative to expert; participants receiving this feedback were more accurate than those provided verbal feedback on gross errors who hit 50% more balls.

    “Todorov et al. showed that the learning of table tennis shots was enhanced by providing performers with concurrent feedback about the trajectory of their paddle (in relation to the paddle trajectory of an expert).Those participants receiving this type of feedback were more accurate in hitting the target than were the participants who were provided verbal feedback (on gross errors) and who hit 50%”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Todorov et al., 1997 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Attentional Focus

    According to common coding theory, efferent and afferent codes can be generated and maintained in a commensurate way only at a distal level of representation.

    “According to this view, efferent and afferent codes can be generated and maintained in a commensurate way only at a distant level of representation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Prinz, 1992 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Observational Learning

    When task demands are simple, this memory structuring may not be important, but when demands are high and subcomponents must be integrated, the influence could be much larger.

    “When the task demands are relatively simple, this may not be important, but when the demands are high and subcomponents must be properly integrated, the influence could be much larger.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    Other experiments have shown little or no benefit of observation.

    “However, other experiments have shown little or no benefit of observation (e.g., Brown & Messersmith, 1948;Burwitz, 1975;Wright, Li, & Coady, 1994).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brown & Messersmith, 1948 source
    • cites Burwitz, 1975

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Wright, Li, & Coady, 1994 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    Observers appear able to extract information necessary to construct appropriate coordination patterns and determine appropriate implementation strategies.

    “However, observers appear to be able to extract information necessary to construct appropriate coordinationpatterns (Schönfelder-Zohdi, 1992;Scully & Newell, 1985;Whiting, 1988) and determine appropriate implementation strategies (Kohl & Shea, 1992).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Schönfelder-Zohdi, 1992

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Scully & Newell, 1985

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Whiting, 1988 source
  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesis

    McNevin et al. proposed a constrained action hypothesis: performers focusing on body movement or close effect tend to actively intervene in control of movements.

    “According to this hypothesis, performers focusing on their body movement, or on an effect that occurs in close proximity to their body, tend to actively intervene in the control of their movements.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McNevin et al., in press

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Not yet classified.

    Premise
    § Observational Learning

    Burwitz concluded that the benefits of observation were mediated by task difficulty.

    “This led Burwitz to conclude that the benefits of observation were mediated by task difficulty.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Burwitz, 1975

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Not yet classified.

    Interpretation
    § Observational Learning

    Learning efficiency is especially important for complex skills because they generally take longer to learn, are more physically demanding, carry more risk, and require more specialized equipment or facilities than simple skills.

    “The issue of learning efficiency, although relevant to the study of both simple and complex skill learning, is especially important for complex skills, because these skills generally take longer to learn, often are more physically demanding, in many cases introduce the potential for more risk, and generally require more specialized equipment or facilities than do simple skills.”
    Quote in the paperNot yet classified
    • Rests on an assumption: Complex skills generally take longer to learn, are more physically demanding, carry more risk, and require more specialized equipment or facilities than simple skills.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Conclusions

    Both feedback and an external focus of attention improved learning of the stabilometer task.

    “Both feedback and an external focus of attention enhanced learning of the stabilometer task.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites C. H. Shea and Wulf (1999)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Observational Learning

    Alternating observational practice with physical practice trials can be quite effective, likely because the observational trials allow information-processing activities that are difficult during a complex, attention-demanding task.

    “These findings demonstrate that alternating observational practice with physical practice trials can be quite effective, presumably because the interspersed observational trials give learners the opportunity to perform information-processing activities that they would not be able to do while performing a complex, highly attention-demanding skill.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    In the Shebilske et al. (1992) and C. H. Shea et al. (2000) experiments, doubling the number of trained participants without increasing time or resources raised training efficiency by at least 100% while not reducing, and sometimes enhancing, learning effectiveness.

    “In the experiments by Shebilske et al. (1992) and C. H. Shea et al. (2000), doubling the number of participants trained without an increase in time and other resources led to increases in training efficiency of at least 100%, while not sacrificing, and even enhancing, learning effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Shebilske et al., 1992 source
    • cites C. H. Shea et al., 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Observational Learning

    Giving learners observational practice during rest intervals would improve training efficiency because two or more learners could be trained in the time previously used for one.

    “Providing learners with observational practice during rest intervals-for example, by having them watch a partner perform-would enhance training efficiency, since two (or more) learners could be trained in the same amount of time as one.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills

    Random practice does not seem beneficial for learning more complex tasks or for inexperienced learners.

    “Furthermore, random practice, which has often been shown to enhance motor learning when simple tasks were used, does not seem to be beneficial for the learning of more complex tasks (or for inexperienced learners); rather, blocked practice can result in more effective learning in these cases (e.g., Albaret & Thon, 1999;Hebert et al., 1996;J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Albaret & Thon, 1999 source
    • cites Hebert et al., 1996 source
    • cites J. B. Shea & Morgan, 1979 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § A Case Against the Utilization of Primarily Simple Tasks in the Study of Motor Skills

    Until boundary conditions are determined, valid principles and comprehensive theories cannot be developed.

    “Until these boundary conditions are determined, valid principles and, thus, comprehensive theories cannot be developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Observational Learning

    If physical and observational practice provide distinct processing opportunities that can separately add to learning, then training protocols combining them should be effective.

    “If physical and observational practice offer unique opportunities for processing that may independently increment learning, acquisition protocols that combine physical and observational practice should be effective training procedures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data
    § Observational Learning

    In the Shebilske et al. AIM dyad study, whole-task test games showed no differences between the dyad and individual training groups; both learned the same amount.

    “On test games that required control of the whole task, however, there were no differences between groups-that is, both groups showed the same amount of learning (also see Jordan, 1997, for a meta-analysis).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jordan, 1997

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Observational Learning

    Simple tasks may benefit less from the reduced processing loads that characterize observational practice.

    “Simple tasks, on the other hand, for which cognitive demands tend to be much lower, may not benefit as much from the reduced processing loads characteristic of observational practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Simple motor tasks tend to have much lower cognitive demands than complex tasks.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Observational Learning

    Combining observation and physical practice can greatly raise learning efficiency without reducing learning effectiveness.

    “It is also important to note that combined observation and physical practice protocols have the potential to greatly increase learning efficiency without sacrificing learning effectiveness (C.H. Shea et al., 2000;C. H. Shea et al., 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites C.H. Shea et al., 2000 source
    • cites C. H. Shea et al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Observational Learning

    Observational practice requires less physical energy, lowers injury risk, and does not depend on equipment or specific space as physical practice does.

    “Clearly, from a personal standpoint, observational practice requires the expenditure of less physical energy, reduces the risk of injury, and is not dependent on equipment or specific space requirements, as in the case of physical practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Observational practice requires less physical energy, reduces injury risk, and is less dependent on equipment or specific space than physical practice.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    In C. H. Shea et al. (1999), dyad practice caused an initial acquisition decrement relative to individual practice, but dyad participants caught up and tended to be more effective by the end of acquisition.

    “Even though there was an initial performance decrement under dyad practice conditions in acquisition, relative to individual practice, the dyad group participants quickly caught up with the individual group participants and even tended to be more effective at the end of the acquisition phase (see Figure 6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites C. H. Shea et al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Observational Learning

    C. H. Shea et al. (1999) found that practice with a partner was more effective than individual practice.

    “The results showed that practice with a partner was more effective than individual practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites C. H. Shea et al., 1999

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § SUMMARY, FUTURE DIRECTIONS, AND CONCLUSIONS

    Including more complex and ecologically valid tasks in research would improve understanding of learning.

    “We do believe, however, that the inclusion of more complex and ecologically valid tasks in our research would further enhance our understanding of learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Observational Learning

    Because complex skills are generally more attention demanding, the beneficial effects of observational practice should be clearer for complex tasks.

    “Thus, since complex skills are generally more attention demanding, the beneficial effects of observational practice should be seen more clearly for complex tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Complex motor skills generally impose higher attention demands than simple motor skills.
105 of 105
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Learners have a limited amount of processing capacity.

    “compete with the essential processing activities for a limited amount of processing capacity during the learning process.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The simple and complex tasks compared across the reviewed studies are sufficiently comparable that differences in findings can be attributed to task complexity rather than to other methodological differences.

    “In contrast to the simple laboratory tasks used in many studies, reducing relative feedback frequency did not enhance learning of the ski simulator task.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Task complexity is a well-defined property that distinguishes simple laboratory tasks from complex motor skills.

    “Guadagnoli, Dornier, and Tandy (1996) directly demonstrated that task complexity, as well as task-related experience, interacted with the optimal number of trials summarized.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Complex motor skills generally impose higher attention demands than simple motor skills.

    “Thus, since complex skills are generally more attention demanding, the beneficial effects of observational practice should be seen more clearly for complex tasks.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Simple motor tasks tend to have much lower cognitive demands than complex tasks.

    “Simple tasks, on the other hand, for which cognitive demands tend to be much lower, may not benefit as much from the reduced processing loads characteristic of observational practice.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Complex skills generally take longer to learn, are more physically demanding, carry more risk, and require more specialized equipment or facilities than simple skills.

    “because these skills generally take longer to learn, often are more physically demanding, in many cases introduce the potential for more risk, and generally require more specialized equipment or facilities than do simple skills.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Observational practice requires less physical energy, reduces injury risk, and is less dependent on equipment or specific space than physical practice.

    “Clearly, from a personal standpoint, observational practice requires the expenditure of less physical energy, reduces the risk of injury, and is not dependent on equipment or specific space requirements, as in the case of physical practice.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Simple skills can be effectively learned with relatively little practice.

    “than for simple skills that can be effectively learned with relatively little practice.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Feedback frequency should be reduced as skill increases and functional task complexity decreases, in order to support motor learning.

    “Thus, the frequency of feedback should decrease with increasing skill level-that is, with decreasing functional task complexityto further facilitate motor learning (Guadagnoli & Lee, 2004;Timmermans, Seelen, Willmann, & Kingma, 2009;Wulf & Shea, 2002;Wulf, Shea, & Matschiner, 1998).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002

    The paper says functional task complexity decreases as expertise develops, and its Feedback frequency section reports that reduced feedback can benefit simpler tasks. But its section on complex skills late in practice treats reducing feedback with increasing experience as a possibility requiring further study, not an established recommendation that it should be reduced to facilitate learning. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Learners seem to benefit from concurrent feedback especially in very early learning phases because it seems to reduce cognitive load.

    “Especially in very early learning phases, learners seem to benefit from concurrent feedback (Todorov et al., 1997) because it seems to decrease cognitive load (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002

    The Summary (page unavailable) says that frequent feedback can facilitate learning complex skills with high attentional and memory demands, and reports that concurrent feedback on every trial was most effective for a complex ski-simulator task. It does not establish that concurrent feedback itself decreases cognitive load; the citing sentence attributes the early-learning benefit to Todorov et al., not to Wulf and Shea. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findings from simple tasks should not be transferred without caution to complex task learning.

    “However, one should be careful in transferring conclusions found in studies on simple tasks to complex task learning (Guadagnoli & Lee, 2004;Winstein, 1991;Wulf & Shea, 2002).”
  • The effect of augmented feedback depends on task complexity and skill level.

    “Applied methods and gained results of related studies have revealed that the impact of augmented feedback depends on task complexity and skill level (Timmermans et al., 2009;Utley & Astill, 2008;Wulf & Shea, 2002).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Wulf & Shea, 2002

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In early learning, concurrent feedback can prevent cognitive overload and thereby improve learning of complex motor tasks.

    “Another reason might be that in an early learning phase, concurrent feedback can prevent cognitive overload and, therefore, enhance learning of complex motor tasks (Wulf & Shea, 2002).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Practice-trial count conflicts with the figure's trial numbering

    Minor

    The study is described as having 10 practice trials per day. In Figure 2, however, Day 1 runs from a pretest at Trial 1 through practice at Trial 9, with Day 2 beginning at Trial 10; that leaves only eight numbered practice trials on Day 1.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 213 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Burwitz, L. (1975).Observational learning and motor performance. Paper presented at the FEPSAC Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  2. Fitts, P. M., &Posner, M. I. (1967).Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  3. Gabriele, T. E., Lee, T. D., &Hall, C. R. (1991). Contextual interference in movement timing: Specific effects in retention and transfer.Journal of Human Movement Studies,20, 177–188.
  4. Lotze, R. H. (1852).Medicinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele (Medical psychology or physiology of the soul). Leipzig: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.
  5. Newell, K. M., &Slifkin, A. B. (1996). The nature of movement variability. In J. Piek (Ed.),Motor control and human skill: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 143–159). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  6. Pinto-Zipp, G., &Gentile, A. M. (1995). Practice schedules in motor learning: Children vs. adults.Society of Neuroscience: Abstracts,21, 1620.
  7. Prinz, W., Aschersleben, G., Hommel, B., &Vogt, S. (1995). Handlungen als Ereignisse [Actions as events]. In D. Dörner & E. van der Meer (Eds.),Das Gedächtnis: Probleme—Trends—Perspektiven (pp. 129–168). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
  8. Schönfelder-Zohdi, B. G. (1992).Investigating the informational nature of a modelled visual demonstration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wulf, G., & Shea, C. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
Corresponding author
Wulf, Gabriele
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2002-06
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
185-211
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2083133776
Cited by
829
References
213
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 36
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Sports and Physical Education Research
Keywords
generalizability, processing demands, motor learning, skill acquisition
MeSH terms
Attention, Feedback, Generalization, Response, Humans, Motor Skills, Practice, Psychological, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review