Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey

Wiederman, Michael W.·1997·The Journal of Sex Research

Abstract

In the current study, data from a nationally representative sample of 884 men and 1,288 women (1994 General Social Survey, Davis & Smith, 1994) who have ever been married were analyzed with regard to incidence, prevalence, and correlates of extramarital sex (EMS). Men were more likely than women to report ever engaging in EMS (22.7% vs. 11.6%, p < .00001), yet, after correcting the probability value for multiple tests, the apparent gender difference regarding the proportion of respondents who had EMS during the past year was not statistically significant (4.1% vs. 1.7%, p < .008). Interestingly, there was no gender difference in lifetime incidence among respondents younger than 40 years of age. Except for the oldest cohort, lifetime incidence of EMS increased with age for men, whereas for women there was an apparently curvilinear relationship such that lifetime incidence of EMS was greatest among those 30–50 years of age. Those who have ever been divorced, and those with greater attitudinal acceptance of EMS, had higher incidence of EMS compared to those who have not been divorced and those reporting greater disapproval of EMS. With regard to possible gender differences, men and women who denied ever engaging in EMS did not differ in their attitudes about EMS, just as men and women who reported having experienced EMS did not differ in their attitudes. The results are discussed in relation to previous research and unanswered questions left for further investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00224499709551881

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Allgeier , A. R. and Allgeier , E. R. 1995 . Sexual interactions , (4th ed) , Lexington, MA : D. C. Heath .
  2. Clements , M. 1994 . Sex in America today: A new national survey reveals how our attitudes are changing . Parade Magazine , August 7 : 4 – 6 .
  3. Clements , M. 1996 . Sex after 65 . Parade Magazine , March 17 : 4 – 7 .
  4. 10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1028 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1028
  5. 10.1086/269215 · doi:10.1086/269215
  6. 10.2307/352165 · doi:10.2307/352165
  7. Wellings , K. , Field , J. , Johnson , A. M. and Wadsworth , J. 1994 . Sexual behavior in Britain: The National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles , New York : Penguin Books .

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Wiederman, M. W.
Venue
The Journal of Sex Research
Published
1997-01
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
167-174
ISSN
  • 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8519
OpenAlex
W2011853123
Cited by
340
References
35
FWCI
12.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00224499709551881
The paper
Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Extramarital sex: Prevalence and correlates in a national survey. The Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499709551881

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.