The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships
Abstract
The prevalence rates of unwanted sexual activity indicate that a substantial proportion of both men and women are at risk for experiencing unwanted (nonconsensual) sexual activity. However, little is known about the extent to which men and women consent to unwanted sexual activity, such as when a person indicates willingness to engage in a sexual activity at a time when he or she experiences no sexual desire. In the current study, 80 male and 80 female U.S. college students involved in committed dating relationships kept diaries of their sexual interactions for two weeks. More than one third (38%) of the participants reported consenting to unwanted sexual activity during this period. The most common motives for engaging in this behavior were to satisfy a partner's needs, to promote intimacy, and to avoid relationship tension. Most participants reported positive outcomes associated with these motives. The results indicate that previous estimates of the prevalence of unwanted (nonconsensual) sexual experiences may actually represent a confound of nonconsensual and consensual forms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.55.2.162 · Cited by 2,602
Cited by
Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive.
Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.347 · Cited by 808
The gendered nature of sexual scripts.
Wiederman, M. W. (2005) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/1066480705278729 · Cited by 583
The DSM diagnostic criteria for hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women
Brotto, L. A. (2010) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-009-9543-1 · Cited by 312
Asexuality: a mixed-methods approach
Brotto, L. A., Knudson, G., Inskip, J., Rhodes, K., & Erskine, Y. (2010) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9434-x · Cited by 254
Asexuality: classification and characterization
Prause, N., & Graham, C. A. (2007) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9142-3 · Cited by 225
Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206293472 · Cited by 218
Adams-Curtis, L. E., & Forbes, G. B. (2004) · Trauma, Violence, & Abuse · doi:10.1177/1524838003262331 · Cited by 215
He is a Stud, She is a Slut! A Meta-Analysis on the Continued Existence of Sexual Double Standards
Endendijk, J. J., van Baar, A. L., & Deković, M. (2020) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868319891310 · Cited by 200
The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in Men
Brotto, L. A. (2010) · The Journal of Sexual Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01860.x · Cited by 139
Katz, J., & Tirone, V. (2009) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9566-4 · Cited by 95
Setty, E. (2019) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0957-x · Cited by 75
In pursuit of ‘good’ sex: Self-determination and the sexual experience
Smith, C. V. (2007) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407507072589 · Cited by 63
Women’s Emotion Work in the Context of Intimate Partner Sexual Violence
Tarzia, L. (2021) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-020-00204-x · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Sullivan, L. F., & Allgeier, E. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Sex Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 234-243
- ISSN
- 0022-4499 (ISSN-L)
- 1559-8519
- OpenAlex
- W2046226571
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.