Cited by 225LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyGender and Feminist StudiesSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Asexuality: classification and characterization

Open access
Prause, Nicole, Graham, Cynthia A.·2007·Archives of Sexual Behavior

Abstract

The term "asexual" has been defined in many different ways and asexuality has received very little research attention. In a small qualitative study (N = 4), individuals who self-identified as asexual were interviewed to help formulate hypotheses for a larger study. The second larger study was an online survey drawn from a convenience sample designed to better characterize asexuality and to test predictors of asexual identity. A convenience sample of 1,146 individuals (N = 41 self-identified asexual) completed online questionnaires assessing sexual history, sexual inhibition and excitation, sexual desire, and an open-response questionnaire concerning asexual identity. Asexuals reported significantly less desire for sex with a partner, lower sexual arousability, and lower sexual excitation but did not differ consistently from non-asexuals in their sexual inhibition scores or their desire to masturbate. Content analyses supported the idea that low sexual desire is the primary feature predicting asexual identity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10508-006-9142-3

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A mixed-methods approach is beneficial for elucidating understudied aspects of human sexuality and developing new treatments.

    “Given the demonstrated benefits of a mixed-methods approach for elucidating understudied aspects of human sexuality and developing new treatments,44, 45, 46, 47, 48”

    From Preliminary Development of a Mindfulness-Based Group Therapy to Expand Couples’ Sexual Intimacy after Prostate Cancer: A Mixed Methods Approach (2021) · cites this paper as [47]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says that combining qualitative and quantitative data helped interpret findings about asexuality, supporting the benefit of a mixed-methods approach for studying an understudied aspect of sexuality. It mentions implications for people who may seek treatment, but does not say the approach helped develop new treatments. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cole, E. (1993). Is sex a natural function?: Implications for sex therapy. In E. Rothblum & K. Brehony (Eds.), Boston marriages: Romantic but asexual relationships among contemporary lesbians (pp. 188-193). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prause, N., & Graham, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Graham, Cynthia A.
Venue
Archives of Sexual Behavior
Published
2007-03-08
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
341-356
ISSN
  • 0004-0002 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2800
OpenAlex
W2159834601
Cited by
225
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
asexuality, asexual identity, sexual desire, sexual inhibition, sexual excitation, masturbation, sexual history
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Sexual Abstinence, Sexuality, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review