Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multigenerational transmission of family size in contemporary Sweden

Kolk, Martin·2014·Population Studies
DOI 10.1080/00324728.2013.819112
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study of the intergenerational transmission of fertility has a long history in demography, but until now research has focused primarily on parents' influence on their children's fertility patterns and has largely overlooked the possible influence of other kin. This study examines the transmission of fertility patterns from parents, grandparents, uncles, and aunts, using event history models to determine the risk of first, second, and third births. Swedish register data are used to study the 1970-82 birth cohorts. The findings indicate strong associations between the fertility of index persons and that of their parents, and also independent associations between the completed fertility of index persons and that of their grandparents and parents' siblings. The results suggest that, when examining background effects in fertility research, it is relevant to take a multigenerational perspective and to consider the characteristics of extended kin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00324728.2013.819112

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1177/0958928707081068 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/2574453 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/2061386 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2061908 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/00324728.2011.579148 · DOI
  6. 10.1553/populationyearbook2011s179 · DOI
  7. Barber J. S., 2000, Social Forces, 79, 319, 10.1093/sf/79.1.319 · DOI
  8. 10.1006/ssre.2000.0697 · DOI
  9. Bernardi L., 2010, Family, Kinship and State in Contemporary Europe, 177
  10. Björklund A., 2009, Handbook of Economic Inequality, 491
  11. Boholm Å., 1983, Swedish Kinship: An Exploration into Cultural Processes of Belonging and Continuity
  12. 10.2307/2137804 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/0199258457.001.0001 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/geront/40.2.179 · DOI
  15. 10.1017/S0140525X09991105 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00599178 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/089826439901100204 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/019251301022004005 · DOI
  19. 10.2307/2060135 · DOI
  20. Edin K. A., 1935, Studies of Differential Fertility in Sweden
  21. 10.1093/esr/jcl027 · DOI
  22. Euler H. A., 1996, Human Nature, 7, 39, 10.1007/BF02733489 · DOI
  23. 10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Fokkema T., 2008, Solidarity between Parents and their Adult Children in Europe, 76, 10.2307/j.ctt6wp66q · DOI
  25. 10.1017/S0144686X07006617 · DOI
  26. 10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.4 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/ajhb.1103 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s12110-997-1008-4 · DOI
  29. 10.2307/584111 · DOI
  30. 10.4054/DemRes.2006.14.16 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0003122412464040 · DOI
  32. 10.2307/2060799 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s12110-010-9098-9 · DOI
  34. 10.1353/dem.2001.0005 · DOI
  35. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.6 · DOI
  36. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105054 · DOI
  37. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.9 · DOI
  38. 10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.2 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Lam D., 1986, American Economic Review, 76, 1103
  40. 10.1017/S0021932000015947 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/s12062-010-9022-4 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/BF03213733 · DOI
  43. 10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.23 · DOI
  44. 10.1006/ssre.1997.0598 · DOI
  45. Murphy M., 1999, Social Biology, 46, 122
  46. 10.1080/00324720215937 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/978-1-4615-1137-3_11 · DOI
  48. 10.1023/A:1010744314362 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00378.x · DOI
  50. 10.1002/ajhb.22300 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s12110-008-9046-0 · DOI
  52. 10.1098/rsta.1899.0006 · DOI
  53. 10.1086/518446 · DOI
  54. 10.1017/S0021932009003307 · DOI
  55. 10.2307/2060423 · DOI
  56. 10.4054/DemRes.2011.25.4 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s12110-008-9032-6 · DOI
  58. 10.1353/dem.2001.0009 · DOI
  59. Rossi A. S., 1990, Of Human Bonding: Parent–Child Relations Across the Life Course
  60. Schneider D. M., 1975, The American Kin Universe: A Genealogical Study
  61. Schneider D. M., 1978, Class Differences in American Kinship
  62. 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00379.x · DOI
  63. 10.1080/00324720701788616 · DOI
  64. 10.1007/BF01253070 · DOI
  65. 10.1002/ajhb.20059 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/geront/38.3.276 · DOI
  67. Van de Kaa D. J., 1987, Population Bulletin, 42, 1, 10.3917/popu.p1987.42n1.0005 · DOI
  68. Wrong D. H., 1980, Class Fertility Trends in Western Nations
  69. Young M. D., 1957, Family and Kinship in East London

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kolk, M.
Venue
Population Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-08-20
Volume
68
Issue
1
Pages
111-129
ISSN
  • 0032-4728
  • 1477-4747
DOI
10.1080/00324728.2013.819112
Cited by
55
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review