Cited by 15Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyBipolar Disorder and Treatment

A Strategy to Address High Comorbidity of Personality Disorders in a Chinese Population: A Principal and Subordinate Diagnostic Model

Wang, JunJie, Chen, Zheng, Sun, Wei, Zheng, YuChen, Hui, Li, Liu, XiaoHua, Wang, JiJun, Wu, HaiSu +2 more·2019·Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Multiple and overlapping diagnoses of personality disorders (PDs) have been a major obstacle in clinical practice and research. This study aims to investigate the comorbidity of PDs in a sample of a high-risk clinical population. We propose a diagnostic model to address this critical issue.Methods: The sample population included 982 PD patients. The PD diagnoses were concluded based on self-reported and face-to-face interviews. To address the issue of overlapping PD diagnoses, we defined the criteria for clinically distinguishing principal and subordinate PDs, and determined the frequency of each condition.Results: Diagnostic overlap among PDs was quite common across all categories. Of all 982 PD patients, 436 (44.4%) met the criteria for more than one PD. In terms of specific PD diagnoses, the comorbidity rate of each PD was nearly 47.1–74.7%. The principal and subordinate PDs were distinguished accordingly. Avoidant, obsessive-compulsive, and borderline PD remain the most prevalent types of principal PD in this clinical population.Conclusions: The principal/subordinate model may be one strategy of resolving the issue of PD comorbidity in Chinese clinical settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00332747.2019.1600218

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J., Chen, Z., Sun, W., Zheng, Y., Hui, L., Liu, X., Wang, J., Wu, H., Qiao, Y., & Zhang, T.
Affiliations
Punan Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, TianHong
Venue
Psychiatry
Published
2019-04-24
Volume
82
Issue
3
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-281X
OpenAlex
W2941596009
Cited by
15
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of China, National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC1306803)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671329)
  • Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders (13dz2260500)
  • Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center, Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (16CR2015A)
  • Shanghai Key Basic Research Project (16JC1420201)
  • Suzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau, China (sys2018097)
  • Shanghai Mental Health Center Foundation (2016-FX-01)
  • Shanghai Academic Research Leader (16XD1402400)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2016YFC1306803)
  • Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (16XD1402400)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
personality disorders, comorbidities, diagnostic overlap, Chinese patients, avoidant personality disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, borderline personality disorder, diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, China, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Asian People, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review