The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Examining and Extending Research in Coach Development
Abstract
Research to date provides two approaches to assessing coaching expertise. The first is behavioral assessment and the second is to assess coaches' knowledge base. However, we contend that both approaches are flawed due to their inability to adequately improve coach development by failing to answer three fundamental questions: What knowledge should be taught to novice coaches? What is the optimal method for teaching this knowledge? And how should we assess to encourage learning? Cognitive psychology has demonstrated that someone with expert cognitive skill is characterized as having expert declarative and procedural knowledge. Experts are further characterized by having greater organization of this knowledge. Thus the expert is able to apply expert knowledge in a more expert manner to solve complex problems in a specific domain. Properly exploiting ideas such as these can help direct future research to provide answers to the questions posed above.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices*
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2 · Cited by 5,248
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
Anderson, J. R. (2014) · Cited by 4,121
Becoming a critically reflective teacher
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-5232 · Cited by 3,754
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
Rabkin, L. Y. (1987) · American Journal of Psychotherapy · doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1987.41.1.146 · Cited by 3,187
Solso, R., & Chase, W. G. (1974) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421395 · Cited by 2,124
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x · Cited by 1,582
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) · Visual Information Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-170150-5.50011-1 · Cited by 1,419
Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem situations.
Anderson, J. R. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.94.2.192 · Cited by 1,023
Cited by
Coach Education and Continuing Professional Development: Experience and Learning to Coach
Cushion, C. J., Armour, K. M., & Jones, R. L. (2003) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2003.10491800 · Cited by 791
Stimulated recall: a report on its use in naturalistic research
Lyle, J. (2003) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/0141192032000137349 · Cited by 774
Practice, instruction and skill acquisition in soccer: challenging tradition
Williams, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2005) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640410400021328 · Cited by 496
Williams, A. M., & Ericsson, K. A. (2005) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2005.06.002 · Cited by 494
Learning to Coach through Experience: Reflection in Model Youth Sport Coaches
Gilbert, W. D., & Trudel, P. (2001) · Journal of Teaching in Physical Education · doi:10.1123/jtpe.21.1.16 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Abraham, A., & Collins, D.
- Venue
- Quest
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 59-79
- ISSN
- 0033-6297 (ISSN-L)
- 1543-2750
- OpenAlex
- W1969330079
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 1.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Examining and Extending Research in Coach Development. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00336297.1998.10484264
- The paper
- Abraham, A., & Collins, D. (1998). Examining and Extending Research in Coach Development. Quest. https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1998.10484264
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
