Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Educator Training and Historical PedagogyTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Transdisciplinary Approach to Teacher Preparation: Providing Equitable Access for All Students to Learn Social Studies Content, Skills, and Processes

Mueller Worster, Anneliese, Rohde, Leigh·2020·The Social Studies

Abstract

Contextualized in the critical pedagogies of universal design for learning (UDL) and social justice education, our study aimed to equip teacher candidates (TCs) to provide students with equitable access to learning social studies content knowledge, skills, and processes as a way to equally empower all students to be civically engaged, and thus to disrupt the social reproduction of empowering privileged students and disempowering marginalized ones in the public schools. An earlier study indicated that our TCs did not transfer or generalize the UDL framework from foundation courses to subsequent classes or in practice. This case study describes how and in what ways elementary education faculty used a transdisciplinary approach, integrating the UDL framework taught in the foundation’s course into a social studies methods course to facilitate TCs’ continued learning and application of theory into practice. The results of this case study suggest that TCs that TCs had not yet internalized the UDL framework or critical consciousness and that these must be intentionally transferred and generalized to new coursework by the faculty on a consistent, ongoing basis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00377996.2020.1736489

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.5430/wje.v8n2p66 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/002205748016200106 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Arthur J., 2012, Research methods and methodologies in education
  4. Bruner J. S., 1960, The process of education, 10.4159/9780674028999 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Campbell C., 2010, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22, 179
  6. Canter L. L. S., 2017, Exceptionality Education International, 27, 1
  7. 10.1177/0888406412446178 · DOI
  8. Creswell J., 2007, Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches
  9. Donahue-Keegan D., 2019, Teacher Education Quarterly, 46, 150
  10. 10.1177/0888406411420887 · DOI
  11. Freire P., 1970, Pedagogy of the oppressed
  12. 10.1177/0022487102053002003 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1207/s15430421tip4203_3 · DOI
  14. 10.22329/celt.v10i0.4745 · DOI
  15. Goodlad J., 1990, Teachers for our nation’s schools
  16. 10.1080/10665680590935034 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/10665680490453931 · DOI
  18. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (1975). IDEA, 1975. 20 U.S.C § 1400. 1990, 1997, 2004.
  19. Israel M., 2015, Universal design for learning innovation configuration: Recommendations for preservice teacher preparation and inservice professional development
  20. 10.1080/00405849509543675 · DOI
  21. McGregor S., 2015, Sustainability frontiers: Critical; and transformative voices from the borderlands of sustainability education, 79
  22. Merriam S. B., 1998, Qualitative research and case study applications in education
  23. National Council for the Social Studies, 1992, Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for social studies
  24. Navarro S. B., 2016, Educational Technology & Society, 19, 17
  25. Özlem S., 2017, Is everyone really equal? An introduction to key concepts in social justice education
  26. Piaget J., 1959, The language and thought of the child.
  27. 10.1177/0741932513518980 · DOI
  28. 10.4148/2470-6353.1260 · DOI
  29. Rose D. H., 2002, Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning
  30. Rose D. H., 2017, The universally designed classroom: Accessible curriculum and digital technologies.
  31. Schram T., 2003, Conceptualizing qualitative inquiry: Mindwork for fieldwork in education and the social sciences
  32. 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2011.01120.x · DOI
  33. Toney J., 2010, Dean and Provost, 11, 4
  34. Venkatesh, K. (2015).Universal design for learning as a framework for social justice: A multicase analysis of undergraduate preservice teachers(Unpublished Ph.d. thesis). University of Boston College.
  35. Villegas A. M., 2007, Educational Leadership, 64, 28
  36. 10.1177/0162643415618931 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.002 · DOI
  38. Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, 79
  39. Zeichner K., 2005, Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education, 645

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Mueller Worster, A., & Rohde, L.
Affiliations
  • School of Education, Salem State University, Salem, MA, USA
  • Salem State University (US)
Venue
The Social Studies
Published
2020-03-09
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
205-218
ISSN
  • 0037-7996 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-405X
OpenAlex
W3010676444
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Social Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Keywords
Universal Design for Learning, social justice education, teacher preparation, transdisciplinarity, social studies methods course, critical consciousness, citizen participation, marginalized students, theory-practice transfer, pre-service teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Teacher Preparation: Providing Equitable Access for All Students to Learn Social Studies Content, Skills, and Processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00377996.2020.1736489
The paper
Mueller Worster, A., & Rohde, L. (2020). A Transdisciplinary Approach to Teacher Preparation: Providing Equitable Access for All Students to Learn Social Studies Content, Skills, and Processes. The Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2020.1736489

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.