Cited by 102Academic integrity and plagiarismEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

The Relation Between Academic Motivation and Cheating

Anderman, Eric M., Koenka, Alison C.·2017·Theory Into Practice

Abstract

Academic cheating occurs frequently in schools. Cheating is a deliberative act, in that students make a conscious decision to engage in academic dishonesty. Students’ achievement goals, which are malleable, often guide the ways that students make such decisions. Educators can incorporate various instructional practices and support academic policies that enhance positive motivational beliefs (e.g., mastery goals), potentially reducing academic dishonesty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00405841.2017.1308172

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderman, E. M., & Koenka, A. C.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Anderman, Eric M.
Venue
Theory Into Practice
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
95-102
ISSN
  • 0040-5841 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-0421
OpenAlex
W2599279162
Cited by
102
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2017: 2
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Theory Into Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
academic dishonesty, academic motivation, achievement goals, mastery goals, motivational beliefs, student decision-making, academic policy, instructional practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review