Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Moving to produce: Nukak mobility and settlement patterns in Amazonia

Politis, Gustavo G.·1996·World Archaeology

Abstract

This paper presents original information on the mobility and settlement patterns of the Nukak, who live between the Guaviare and Inirida rivers in the Colombian Amazon. The objective of this paper is to provide a better understanding of how egalitarian societies produce spatial arrangements in order to organize their settlements and to exploit the tropical rain forest resources. Traditional Nukak subsistence is based on hunting and the gathering of plants and animal products such as honey, turtle eggs and palm grubs; fishing and small‐scale horitculture are also practised. High residential mobility is practised in both the rainy and the dry season; it is estimated that bands make between seventy and eighty residential moves per year. Residential camps comprise two to five domestic units and usually cover under 130 m2. The Nukak case shows that forager mobility in tropical rain forests is not exclusively the consequence of avoiding over‐exploitation of an easily depleted environment. On the contrary, mobility is partly a complex way of concentrating forest resources in patches: the Nukak ‘move to produce’. Sanitation, abandonment due to a death, social/ritual activities, and inter‐band marriage also play a role. Therefore we must seek historical and socio‐ideological reasons as well as environmental ones for the high mobility and low population density of tropical hunter‐gatherers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00438243.1996.9980322

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. 10.1007/BF01418729 · DOI
  2. Ardila G., 1992, América Negra, 3, 171
  3. Ardila G., 1992, Revista de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 26, 2
  4. 10.1007/BF00888748 · DOI
  5. Balée W., 1989, Advances in Economic Botany;, 7, 1
  6. Barse W., 1990, Science, 250
  7. Bettinger R. L., 1991, Hunter‐Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory, 10.1007/978-1-4899-0658-8 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/279653 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0278-4165(82)90006-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. Binford L., 1990, Journal of Anthropological Research, 46, 119, 10.1086/jar.46.2.3630069 · DOI
  11. Binford L., 1991, Ethnoarchaeological Approaches to Mobile Campsites, 25
  12. 10.1007/BF00888743 · DOI
  13. Cabrera G., 1994, Aportes a la Etnografía de los Nukak y su lengua: Aspectos sobre Fonología Segmental
  14. Chase A. K., 1989, Foraging and Farming. The Evolution of Plant Domestication, 42
  15. Chaves M., 1988, Noticias Antropológicas, 89
  16. Correa F., 1987, Introducción a la Colombia Amerindia, 123
  17. Descola Ph, 1994, In the Society of Nature. A Native Ecology in Amazonia
  18. Dominguez C.A., 1985, Amazonia Colombiana
  19. 10.1525/aa.1987.89.2.02a00070 · DOI
  20. Fisher J., 1991, Ethnoarchaeological Approaches to Mobile Campsites, 215
  21. Gamble C., 1991, Ethnoarchaeological Approaches to Mobile Campsites
  22. 10.1016/0278-4165(87)90017-1 · DOI
  23. Harris D., 1989, Foraging and Farming: The Evolution of Plant Exploitation, 11
  24. Hecht S. B., 1989, Advances in Economic Botany, 7, 174
  25. Hitchcock R., 1982, Politics and History in Band Societies, 223
  26. Kelly R. L., 1983, Journal of Anthropological Research, 39, 277, 10.1086/jar.39.3.3629672 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000355 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Kent S., 1989, Farmers as Hunters: The Implication of Sedentism, 96
  29. Koch‐Grunberg T., 1906, Anthropos, 1, 877
  30. Kricher J., 1989, The Neotropical Companion
  31. 10.1525/aa.1992.94.1.02a00030 · DOI
  32. Lee R., 1968, Man the Hunter
  33. Metraux A., 1948, Handbook of Southamerican Indians, 3, 861
  34. 10.1525/aa.1984.86.1.02a00020 · DOI
  35. Politis G., 1992, Proa, 412, 11
  36. Politis G., 1994, Revista del Museo de Historia Natural de San Rafael (Mendoza), 43
  37. Politis G., Pasado y Presente de los Cazadores‐recolectores de America del Sur
  38. Politis G., 1994, Colombia Amazónica, 7, 169
  39. Politis G., Revista Española de Antropología Americana
  40. Posey D., 1984, Advances in Economic Botany, 1, 112
  41. Reid H., 1979, Some aspects of movement, growth, and change among the Hupdu Maku Indians of Brasil
  42. Reina L., 1990, Mopa‐Mopa, 5, 17
  43. Reina L., 1992, Diversidad es riqueza, 62
  44. Rindos D., 1984, The Origins of Agriculture: An Evolutionary Perspective
  45. 10.1126/science.254.5038.1621 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Silverwood‐Cope P., 1972, A Contribution to the Ethnography of the Colombian Makú
  47. 10.2307/2783494 · DOI
  48. Wirpsa L., 1988, Cultural Survival Quarterly, 12, 36

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Politis, G. G.
Venue
World Archaeology
Published
1996-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
492-511
ISSN
  • 0043-8243
  • 1470-1375
Cited by
78
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review