The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-truth GPS: Detour at truth, take the long route to useful knowledge
Abstract
It would be easier to navigate our information world if we had a navigational system to guide us. Absent such a system, the authors of the five articles in this special issue propose different ways to help learners engage with scientific information, in light of the post-truth condition. I suggest that the contribution of these articles lies in their emphasis on encouraging deliberation-oriented practices, and in presenting a qualified view of science. I further argue that greater knowledge of this qualified science, as well as privileging science, may be necessary components. In order to have an impact on learners’ lives, I encourage adopting a framework of mastery and appropriation, and giving greater attention to issues of appropriation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By contrast, System 2 thinking encourages deliberate, reflective analysis, which includes slowing down to question, verify, and compare information [3].”
From When the source is a bot: How people adapt their evaluation strategies to assess AI-generated content (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Citations
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 3×
“For example, although there is evidence that false information is retweeted more than true information (Vosoughi et al., 2018), people surveyed have reported that they retweet information they know to be false in order to “call out” the falsehood (Barthel et al.”
BackgroundTrust and Distrust Definitions: One Bite at a Time
Harrison McKnight, D., & Chervany, N. L. (2001) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45547-7_3 · Cited by 747
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- Bacon C. K., 2018, Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 147, 10.14507/epaa.26.3377 · DOI
- Barzilai S., 2020, Educational Psychologist
- 10.1177/0956797617752640 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00461520.2014.921572 · DOI · Paper page
- Ceci S. J., 1991, American Psychologist, 46, 27, 10.1037/0003-066X.46.1.27 · DOI
- Chinn C. A., 2020, Educational Psychologist
- Christensen, B. & Abildgaard, S. J. J. (2018). Co-located team designing: The oscillation between individual and social processes [Paper presentation]. DRS2018 International Conference Proceedings.
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103939 · DOI
- 10.1177/0963662512455296 · DOI
- Feinstein N. W., 2020, Educational Psychologist
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.014 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.08.005 · DOI
- 10.1080/10824669.2013.773217 · DOI
- 10.1177/2056305118797720 · DOI
- 10.1177/0963662513480091 · DOI
- Hoeg D., 2017, Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE, 49, 10.1007/978-3-319-55505-8_3 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13423-017-1289-5 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.002 · DOI
- Kienhues D., 2020, Educational Psychologist, 55, 10.1080/00461520.2020.1784012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.002 · DOI
- 10.1080/15391523.2004.10782420 · DOI
- Lapsley D., 2020, Educational Psychologist
- 10.1080/10508406.2014.928215 · DOI
- Lewandowsky S., 2020, Informed societies, 69
- 10.2196/jmir.3749 · DOI · Paper page
- Nielsen R., 2017, “News you don’t believe”: Audience perspectives on fake news
- Orr D., 2018, Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19, 19.11.34
- 10.1207/s15327809jls1502_3 · DOI
- 10.1002/tea.21144 · DOI
- 10.1002/sce.10113 · DOI
- 10.1177/0963662518772503 · DOI
- Sinatra G. M., 2020, Educational Psychologist
- Tabak I., 2016, Handbook of educational psychology, 269
- 10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_2 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444817712086 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Woolgar S., 2008, Virtual technologies: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications, 1064, 10.4018/978-1-59904-955-7.ch067 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dabran-Zivan, S., Klein-Avraham, I., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2026) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345300 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Tabak, I.
- Affiliations
- Department of Education, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-07-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 181-186
- ISSN
- 0046-1520
- 1532-6985
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
