The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Role of transport proteins in drug absorption, distribution and excretion
Abstract
1. The molecular and functional characterization of transport proteins is emerging rapidly and significant numbers of drugs have been shown to be substrates or inhibitors. The purpose of this review is to highlight the in vivo preclinical and clinical evidence that supports a role for transport proteins in attenuating the absorption, distribution and excretion (ADE) of drugs. 2. For absorption, a clear role has emerged for P-glycoprotein in limiting permeability across the gastrointestinal tract. As a result, a wide variety of drugs suffer from incomplete, variable and non-linear absorption. Similarly, at the blood-brain barrier a range of drugs has limited brain penetration due to P-glycoprotein-mediated efflux, which can limit therapeutic effectiveness of CNS agents. In the liver, transport proteins are present on the sinusoidal membrane that can be the rate-limiting step in hepatic clearance for some drugs. Mechanistic studies clearly suggest a key role and broad substrate specificity for the OATP family of sinusoidal transporters. Mainly ATP-dependent transport proteins such as P-glycoprotein and MRP2 govern active biliary excretion. 3. Drug-drug interactions have been demonstrated involving inhibition or induction of transport proteins. Clinically significant interactions in the gastrointestinal tract and kidney have been observed with inhibitors such as ketoconazole, erythromycin, verapamil, quinidine, probenecid and cimetidine. Clinically significant inhibition at the blood-brain barrier is more difficult to demonstrate, relying on pharmacodynamic and toxicodynamic changes, but an example is quinidine increasing loperamide-induced central effects in humans. 4. This review highlights the emerging role of transport proteins in ADE of drugs and suggests these need to be considered, in drug discovery and development, with respect to variability in drug disposition and response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dresser, G. K., Spence, J. D., & Bailey, D. G. (2000) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200038010-00003 · Cited by 908
Cited by
Polyphenols: Food sources and bioavailability
Manach, C., Scalbert, A., Morand, C., Rémésy, C., & Jiménez, L. (2004) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/79.5.727 · Cited by 8,175
BDDCS, the Rule of 5 and drugability
Benet, L. Z., Hosey, C. M., Ursu, O., & Oprea, T. I. (2016) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.05.007 · Cited by 892
Safety of Statins: Focus on Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interactions
Bellosta, S., Paoletti, R., & Corsini, A. (2004) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000131519.15067.1f · Cited by 578
Martinez, M. N., & Amidon, G. L. (2002) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1177/00970002042006005 · Cited by 536
Transporters and drug therapy: Implications for drug disposition and disease
HO, R., & KIM, R. (2005) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clpt.2005.05.011 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayrton, A., & Morgan, P.
- Venue
- Xenobiotica
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 469-497
- ISSN
- 0049-8254 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-5928
- OpenAlex
- W2092118786
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of transport proteins in drug absorption, distribution and excretion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00498250110060969
- The paper
- Ayrton, A., & Morgan, P. (2001). Role of transport proteins in drug absorption, distribution and excretion. Xenobiotica. https://doi.org/10.1080/00498250110060969
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.