CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 10

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Metalworkers and Smelting Precincts: Technological Reconstructions of Second Millennium Copper Production Around Phalaborwa, Northern Lowveld of South Africa

Thondhlana, Thomas·2013·Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa
DOI 10.1080/0067270x.2012.759683
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Metalworkers and Smelting Precincts: Technological Reconstructions of Second Millennium Copper Production Around Phalaborwa, Northern Lowveld of South Africa . University College, London, 2012. Thi...

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0067270x.2012.759683

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thondhlana (2013) reconstructed copper smelting at Shankare, Phalaborwa, using mineralogical (microscopic) and SEM-EDS (compositional) analyses to document the skills of the smelters in gaining metal and processing it into usable objects.

    “Thondhlana (2013), for example, reconstructed copper smelting at Shankare, Phalaborwa, using mineralogical (microscopic) and SEM-EDS (compositional) analyses to document the skills of the smelters in gaining metal and processing it into usable objects.”

    From Material Science and the Present and Future of African Archaeology (2023) · cites this paper as Thondhlana, 2013

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thondhlana, T.
Venue
Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-03
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
151-152
ISSN
  • 0067-270X
  • 1945-5534
DOI
10.1080/0067270x.2012.759683
Cited by
10
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review