The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Dimensionality of Beliefs toward Advertising in General
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to investigate several key research issues associated with beliefs toward advertising in general. Specifically, the study examines: the predicted dimensionality of Bauer and Greyser's (1968) belief statements toward advertising's economic and social dimensions; the consistency of the economic and social dimensions across multiple sample groups throughout the country; the perceptions of those who should be favorably predisposed to advertising's economic and social effects; and the predicted sample group differences among the Bauer and Greyser belief items. Results indicate separate economic and social belief dimensions, dimension consistency across multiple sample groups, skepticism on the part of segments who may be more favorable to advertising in general, and predicted institutional differences on social belief items. Suggestions for future advertising research are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150973 · Cited by 1,472
Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices
Peter, J. P. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150948 · Cited by 1,189
Cited by
Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising
Obermiller, C., & Spangenberg, E. R. (1998) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_03 · Cited by 1,037
When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism
Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_15 · Cited by 1,003
How consumers assess the value of advertising
Ducoffe, R. H. (1995) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.1995.10505022 · Cited by 774
Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks?: How Gender and Age Shape Receptivity
Taylor, D. G., Lewin, J. E., & Strutton, D. (2011) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-51-1-258-275 · Cited by 656
We Will Make You Like Our Research: The Development of a Susceptibility-to-Persuasion Scale
Modic, D., & Anderson, R. J. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2446971 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, J. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Advertising
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-35
- ISSN
- 0091-3367 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7805
- OpenAlex
- W2056805264
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dimensionality of Beliefs toward Advertising in General. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00913367.1989.10673140
- The paper
- Andrews, J. C. (1989). The Dimensionality of Beliefs toward Advertising in General. Journal of Advertising. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1989.10673140
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.