Cited by 197Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A model of women's sexual arousal.

Basson, Rosemary·2002·Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy

Abstract

A model of female sexual arousal shows the composite emotion of subjective sexual arousal, which results from conscious appraisal of sexual stimuli and their context in the presence of positive affective and cognitive feedback. Genital feedback augments the subjective arousal to a variable degree. Genital congestion can be triggered by sexual stimuli in the absence of subjective arousal. Then the congestion either is ignored or not interpreted as sexual. An anhedonic or even a dysphoric response to the sensations of genital congestion are further possibilities. This model allows for various subtypes of arousal disorder and thus facilitates a choice of therapeutic intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/009262302317250963

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women diagnosed with female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD) exhibit an even higher level of discordance between physiological and subjective arousal than women without FSAD.

    “Women diagnosed with female sexual arousal disorder (FSAD), an umbrella term encompassing many subgroups of women who have complaints about sexual arousal, exhibit an even higher level of discordance (7).”
  • Judgmental thoughts of inadequacy, embarrassment, guilt, and anxiety can monopolize cognitive resources, draw attention away from the present moment, and interfere with interoceptive awareness.

    “Judgmental thoughts of inadequacy, embarrassment, guilt, and anxiety can monopolize cognitive resources, draw attention away from the present moment, and interfere with interoceptive awareness (7,11).”
  • FSAD is characterized by a high level of discordance between physiological and subjective arousal states, such that women are unaware of their own bodily sensations (i.e., low interoceptive awareness).

    “FSAD is characterized by a high level of discordance between physiological and subjective arousal states, such that women are unaware of their own bodily sensations (i.e., low interoceptive awareness) (7).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Basson, R.
Affiliations
University of British Columbia Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Basson, Rosemary
Venue
Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
Published
2002-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 0092-623X (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0715
OpenAlex
W2042919715
Cited by
197
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
female sexual arousal, subjective sexual arousal, sexual stimuli, arousal disorders, dysphoric arousal, anhedonia, therapeutic interventions
MeSH terms
Autonomic Nervous System, Female, Genitalia, Female, Humans, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review