CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 228

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Manifesting Destiny: Re/presentations of Indigenous Peoples in K–12 U.S. History Standards

Shear, Sarah B., Knowles, Ryan T., Soden, Gregory J., Castro, Antonio J.·2015·Theory & Research in Social Education
DOI 10.1080/00933104.2014.999849
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this mixed-methods study, we use a postcolonial framework to investigate how state standards represent Indigenous histories and cultures. The research questions that guided this study include: (a) What is the frequency of Indigenous content (histories, cultures, current issues) covered in state-level U.S. history standards for K–12? (b) What is the difference between the frequency of inclusion of pre-1900 Indigenous content and post-1900 Indigenous content in U.S. history standards for K–12? (c) How do the standards depict Indigenous Peoples in U.S. history? U.S. history curriculum standards from all 50 states and the District of Columbia were analyzed using within-case analysis and quantified to represent each state’s depiction of Indigenous content. Findings reveal that standards overwhelmingly present Indigenous Peoples in a pre-1900 context and relegate the importance and presence of Indigenous Peoples to the distant past.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00933104.2014.999849

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 85

  1. Adams, D. W. (1995). Education for extinction: American Indians and the boarding school experience, 1875–1928. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  2. Ahmad, A. (1994). Orientalism and after. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 162–171). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00664x · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00604.x · DOI
  5. 10.1080/00933104.2011.10473460 · DOI
  6. 10.4324/9780203487563 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Arrows, F. (2013). Teaching truly: A curriculum to indigenize mainstream education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  8. Au W. (2009). The “building tasks” of critical history: Structuring social studies for social justice. Social Studies Research and Practice 4 (2) 24–35. Retrieved from http://www.socstrp.org · DOI
  9. 10.4324/9781410610508 · DOI
  10. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
  11. 10.3200/TSSS.96.6.259-264 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/10665681003719590 · DOI
  13. Chandler P. T. (2010). Critical race theory and social studies: Centering the Native American experience. The Journal of Social Studies Research 34 (1) 29–58. Retrieved from http://www.thejssr.com/ · DOI
  14. 10.1080/00933104.2010.10473424 · DOI
  15. Churchill, W. (2004). Kill the Indian, save the man: The genocidal impact of American Indian residential schools. San Francisco, CA: City Lights.
  16. 10.3102/00028312039002519 · DOI
  17. Cornbleth, C., & Waugh, D. (1995). The great speckled bird: Multicultural politics and education policymaking. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  18. 10.1080/00377996.2011.558938 · DOI
  19. Darder, A., Baltodano, M. P., & Torres, R. D. (2009). Critical pedagogy: An introduction. In A. Darder, M. P. Baltodano, & R. D. Torres (Eds.), The critical pedagogy reader (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Routledge.
  20. Dippie, B. W. (1982). The vanishing American: White attitudes and U.S. Indian policy. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  21. Diversi, M., & Moreira, C. (2009). Betweener talk: Decolonizing knowledge production, pedagogy, and praxis. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.
  22. Epstein, T. (2009). Interpreting national history: Race, identity, and pedagogy in classrooms and communities. New York, NY: Routledge.
  23. Evans, R. W. (2004). The social studies wars: What should we teach the children? New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  24. Fear-Segal, J. (2007). White man’s club: Schools, race, and the struggle of Indian Acculturation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  25. Fixico, D. L. (1998). Ethics and responsibilities in writing American Indian history. In D. A. Mihesuah (Ed.), Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians (pp. 84–99). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  26. 10.1177/003172170608800319 · DOI
  27. Freire, P. (2010). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
  28. Gesener, V. L. (2011). Native transgressions: A look at the portrayal of Karankawa natives in Texas history textbooks and trade books. American Educational History Journal,38(1), 219–236.
  29. Giroux, H. A. (2011). On critical pedagogy. New York, NY: Continuum.
  30. Gradwell, J. M. (2006). Teaching in spite of, rather than because of, the test. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 157–193). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  31. Gramsci, A. (2010). Intellectuals and hegemony. In C. Lemert (Ed.), Social theory: The multicultural and classic readings (pp. 263–265). Boulder, CO: Westview.
  32. Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  33. Grant, S. G. (2003). History lessons: Teaching, learning, and testing in U.S. high school classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  34. Grant, S. G. (Ed.). (2006). Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  35. Grant, S. G., & Salinas, C. (2008). Assessment and accountability in the social studies. In L. Levstik & C. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (2nd ed., 219–236). New York, NY: Routledge.
  36. Hallgren K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 8 (1) 23–34. Retrieved from http://www.tqmp.org/ · DOI · Paper page
  37. Journell W. (2009a). An incomplete history: Representations of American Indians in state social studies standards. Journal of American Indian Education 48 (2) 18–32. Retrieved from http://jaie.asu.edu/
  38. 10.3200/TSSS.100.4.160-168 · DOI
  39. Krippendorff, K. (2003). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. New York, NY: Sage.
  40. Ladson-Billings G. & Tate IV W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record 97 (1) 47–68. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/ · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lintner T. (2007). Critical race theory and the teaching of American history: Power perspectives and practice. Social Studies Research and Practice 2 (1) 103–115. Retrieved from http://www.socstrpr.org/ · DOI
  42. Loewen, J. W. (2007). Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong. New York, NY: Touchstone.
  43. Loewen, J. W. (2010). Teaching what really happened: How to avoid the tyranny of textbooks and get students excited about doing history. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  44. Mann, B. A. (2013). History. In F. Arrows (Ed.), Teaching truly: A curriculum to indigenize mainstream education (pp. 135–151). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  45. Mathison, S., & Freeman, M. (2004). Teachers working with standards and state testing. In S. Mathison & E. W. Ross (Eds.), Defending public schools: The nature and limits of standards-based reform and assessment (Vol. 4, pp. 81–91). Westport, CT: Praeger.
  46. McCarthy C. (1990). Multicultural education minority identities textbooks and the challenge of curriculum reform. Journal of Education 172 118–129. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/ · DOI
  47. 10.4135/9781483385686.n26 · DOI
  48. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardization. New York, NY: Routledge.
  49. 10.4018/978-1-4666-7409-7.ch007 · DOI
  50. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  51. 10.1207/s15327892mcp0602_4 · DOI
  52. Multon, K. (2010). Interrater reliability. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), Encyclopedia of research design (pp. 627–629). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  53. National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2014). Developing state and local social studies standards. Social Education,78, 199–201.
  54. 10.1080/15348431.2012.631441 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/1467-873X.00229 · DOI
  56. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  57. Porter, D. (1994). Orientalism and its problems. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 150–161). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  58. Rains, F. V. (2006). The color of social studies: A post-social studies reality check. In E. W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes, problems, and possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  59. Said, E. (1994). From orientalism. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 132–149). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  60. Salinas, C. (2006). Teaching in a high-stakes testing setting. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 177–193). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  61. 10.1177/0042085901363005 · DOI
  62. Sharp, J. P. (2009). Geographies of postcolonialism. London, UK: Sage.
  63. Sleeter C. E. (2008). Teaching for democracy in an age of corporatocracy. Teachers College Record 110 (1) 139–159. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/ · DOI
  64. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed.
  65. Spivak, G. C. (1994). Can the subaltern speak?. In P. Williams & L. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory: A reader (pp. 66–111). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  66. 10.2307/j.ctvjsf541 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1080/00933104.2012.723242 · DOI
  68. 10.1080/00933104.2008.10473382 · DOI
  69. Symcox, L. (2002). Whose history? The struggle for national standards in American classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  70. Szasz, M. C. (1999). Education and the American Indian: The road to self-determination since 1948. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  71. Thornton, S. J. (1991). Teachers as curricular-instructional gatekeepers in social studies. In J. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237–248). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  72. Thornton, S. J. (2008). Continuity and change in social studies curriculum. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
  73. Trafzer, C. E., Keller, J. A., & Sisquoc, L. (2006). Origin and development of the American Indian boarding school system. In C. E. Trafzer, J. A. Keller, & L. Sisquoc (Eds.), Boarding school blues: Revisiting American Indian educational experiences (pp. 1–34). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  74. 10.1177/0002764213495032 · DOI
  75. Tuck E. & Gaztambide-Fernández R. A. (2013). Curriculum replacement and settler futurity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing 29 (1) 72–89. Retrieved from http://www.jctonline.org/
  76. van Hover, S. (2006). Teaching history in the Old Dominion: The impact of Virginia’s accountability reform on seven secondary beginning history teachers. In S. G. Grant (Ed.), Measuring history: Cases of state-level testing across the United States (pp. 195–219). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  77. 10.1080/00933104.2010.10473417 · DOI
  78. VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  79. VanSledright, B. (2011). The challenge of rethinking history education: On practices, theories, and policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  80. Vasquez-Heilig J. V. Brown K. D. & Brown A. L. (2012). The illusion of inclusion: A critical race theory textual analysis of race and standards. Harvard Educational Review 82 403–424. Retrieved from http://hepg.org/ · DOI
  81. 10.1080/00933104.1993.10505703 · DOI
  82. 10.1080/00933104.2001.10505929 · DOI
  83. Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  84. 10.2307/494699 · DOI
  85. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. New York, NY: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 228

Metadata

Authors
Shear, S. B., Knowles, R. T., Soden, G. J., & Castro, A. J.
Affiliations
  • The Pennsylvania State University–Altoona
  • University of Missouri
Venue
Theory & Research in Social Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2015-01-02
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
68-101
ISSN
  • 0093-3104
  • 2163-1654
DOI
10.1080/00933104.2014.999849
Cited by
228
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review