The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis
Abstract
A synthesis of rights and participatory approaches to citizenship, linked through the notion of human agency, is proposed as the basis for a feminist theory of citizenship. Such a theory has to address citizenship's exclusionary power in relation to both nation-state ‘outsiders’ and ‘insiders’. With regard to the former, the article argues that a feminist theory and politics of citizenship must embrace an internationalist agenda. With regard to the latter, it offers the concept of a ‘differentiated universalism’ as an attempt to reconcile the universalism which lies at the heart of citizenship with the demands of a politics of difference. Embracing also the reconstruction of the public-private dichotomy, citizenship, reconceptualized in this way, can, it is argued, provide us with an important theoretical and political tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Multicultural citizenship: a liberal theory of minority rights
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-2995 · Cited by 4,896
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
Jackson, S. (1985) · Ufahamu A Journal of African Studies · doi:10.5070/f7143017029 · Cited by 4,441
Hamilton, H., & Marshall, T. H. (1951) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/587460 · Cited by 4,094
Castles, S., de Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-36639-8 · Cited by 3,363
Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany
Brubaker, R. (1992) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674028944 · Cited by 3,179
Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center
hooks, B. (1984) · Cited by 3,086
Citizenship and nationhood in France and Germany
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-4034 · Cited by 2,585
Narayan, U., & Radical Philosophy Association (1991) · Radical Philosophy Review of Books · doi:10.5840/radphilrevbooks199135 · Cited by 1,888
(2024) · doi:10.4135/9781529691627 · Cited by 1,835
(2016) · Social Theory Re-Wired · doi:10.4324/9781315775357-68 · Cited by 1,815
Cited by
Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South
Miraftab, F. (2009) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/1473095208099297 · Cited by 696
Neyer, G., Lappegård, T., & Vignoli, D. (2013) · European Journal of Population / Revue européenne de Démographie · doi:10.1007/s10680-013-9292-7 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Lister, R.
- Venue
- Feminist Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 28-48
- ISSN
- 0141-7789 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4380
- OpenAlex
- W2083956445
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/014177897339641
- The paper
- Lister, R. (1997). Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis. Feminist Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/014177897339641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
