Cited by 89Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchIndigenous Cultures and HistoryMigration, Refugees, and Integration

The enduring and vanishing American Indian: American Indian population growth and intermarriage in 1990

Eschbach, Karl·1995·Ethnic and Racial Studies

Abstract

The American Indian and Alaskan Native population has grown rapidly since 1950 because of changes in the racial classification of persons with mixed Indian and non‐Indian descent. These changes have challenged once common expectations that the Indian population was likely to shrink over time through assimilation. However, in regions of the United States where the recent growth of the Indian population has been particularly sharp most married Indians are married to non‐Indians. Fertility rates of women who are part of intermarried couples are lower than fertility rates for Indian women in racially endogamous marriages. The majority of the children of intermarried Indians in high intermarriage regions are labelled with the race of the non‐Indian parent. Intermarriage is likely to substantially reduce the long‐run impact of changes in identification on the future growth of the Indian population. At the same time, in a few states the American Indian population remains ethnically homogenous and shows no signs of imminent amalgamation into the general American population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01419870.1995.9993855

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United States, scholarship is focused on the American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) aggregate population, with an emphasis on population size, composition, undercounting and processes of changing racial identification.

    “In the United States, scholarship is focused on the American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) aggregate population, with an emphasis on population size, composition, undercounting and processes of changing racial identification (Eschbach 1995;Nagel 1996;Sandefur et al. 1996;Snipp 1997;Liebler & Ortyl 2014).”

    From Building a data revolution in Indian country (2016) · cites this paper as Eschbach 1995

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eschbach, K.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Eschbach, Karl
Venue
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Published
1995-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
89-108
ISSN
  • 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4356
OpenAlex
W2051974252
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
intermarriage, racial classification, fertility rate, assimilation, ethnic homogeneity, racial amalgamation, 1990 census, Alaska Natives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review