The enduring and vanishing American Indian: American Indian population growth and intermarriage in 1990
Abstract
The American Indian and Alaskan Native population has grown rapidly since 1950 because of changes in the racial classification of persons with mixed Indian and non‐Indian descent. These changes have challenged once common expectations that the Indian population was likely to shrink over time through assimilation. However, in regions of the United States where the recent growth of the Indian population has been particularly sharp most married Indians are married to non‐Indians. Fertility rates of women who are part of intermarried couples are lower than fertility rates for Indian women in racially endogamous marriages. The majority of the children of intermarried Indians in high intermarriage regions are labelled with the race of the non‐Indian parent. Intermarriage is likely to substantially reduce the long‐run impact of changes in identification on the future growth of the Indian population. At the same time, in a few states the American Indian population remains ethnically homogenous and shows no signs of imminent amalgamation into the general American population.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the United States, scholarship is focused on the American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) aggregate population, with an emphasis on population size, composition, undercounting and processes of changing racial identification.
“In the United States, scholarship is focused on the American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) aggregate population, with an emphasis on population size, composition, undercounting and processes of changing racial identification (Eschbach 1995;Nagel 1996;Sandefur et al. 1996;Snipp 1997;Liebler & Ortyl 2014).”
From Building a data revolution in Indian country (2016) · cites this paper as Eschbach 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The changing racial and ethnic composition of the US population: Emerging American identities
Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00260.x · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Does Multiracial Matter? A Study of Racial Disparities in Self-Rated Health
Bratter, J. L., & Gorman, B. K. (2011) · Demography · doi:10.1007/s13524-010-0005-0 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Building a data revolution in Indian country
Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (2016) · Indigenous Data Sovereignty · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.14 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eschbach, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eschbach, Karl
- Venue
- Ethnic and Racial Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-108
- ISSN
- 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4356
- OpenAlex
- W2051974252
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 17.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- intermarriage, racial classification, fertility rate, assimilation, ethnic homogeneity, racial amalgamation, 1990 census, Alaska Natives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review