Cited by 83Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Does Multiracial Matter? A Study of Racial Disparities in Self-Rated Health

Open access
Bratter, Jenifer L., Gorman, Bridget K.·2011·Demography

Abstract

How do self-identified multiracial adults fit into documented patterns of racial health disparities? We assess whether the health status of adults who view themselves as multiracial is distinctive from that of adults who maintain a single-race identity, by using a seven-year (2001-2007) pooled sample of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). We explore racial differences in self-rated health between whites and several single and multiracial adults with binary logistic regression analyses and investigate whether placing these groups into a self-reported "best race" category alters patterns of health disparities. We propose four hypotheses that predict how the self-rated health status of specific multiracial groups compares with their respective component single-race counterparts, and we find substantial complexity in that no one explanatory model applies to all multiracial combinations. We also find that placing multiracial groups into a single "best race" category likely obscures the pattern of health disparities for selected groups because some multiracial adults (e.g., American Indians) tend to identify with single-race groups whose health experience they do not share.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13524-010-0005-0

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When race is utilized as a descriptive category, the choices about what categories to use and how to assign individuals to categories significantly impacts the results of analysis.

    “When race is utilized as a descriptive category, the choices about what categories to use and how to assign individuals to categories significantly impacts the results of analysis [18, 102, 114, 115].”

    From Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness (2020) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bratter, J. L., & Gorman, B. K.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Venue
Demography
Published
2011-02-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
127-152
ISSN
  • 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7790
OpenAlex
W1965277003
Cited by
83
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Demography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
mixed-race identity, racial disparities, self-rated health, racial identity, racial classification, Native Americans, health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Family Characteristics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Self Concept, Social Identification, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Health Behavior, Logistic Models, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review