The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New hybridities, old concepts: the limits of 'culture'
Abstract
Approaches that find hybrid social forms to be results of interculturality and diasporic relations claim that these are able to transcend "old ethnicities" and that they constitute transgressive cultural formations. I shall argue that the concept of hybridity, although denoting important developments and challenges to static and essentialist notions of ethnicity and identity, presents both conceptual and substantive difficulties. In addition, approaches to "hybridity" may unintentionally provide a gloss over existing cultural hierarchies and hegemonic practices. I shall reformulate the basis for treating "identities" outside the parameters of the old ethnicities, by developing the concept of "translocational" positionality. It is argued that this is a more adequate means for addressing the range of issues relating to belonging hailed by the notion of hybridity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
McIntosh, M. (1991) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1991.33 · Cited by 29,379
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
Bhabha, H. K. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203820551 · Cited by 14,203
The Rules of Sociological Method
Durkheim, E. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9 · Cited by 4,661
Subculture: The Meaning of Style
Hebdige, D. (1995) · Critical Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8705.1995.tb01063.x · Cited by 3,813
Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity
Robertson, R. (1995) · Global Modernities · doi:10.4135/9781446250563.n2 · Cited by 3,783
Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture and Race.
Brantlinger, P., & Young, R. J. C. (1996) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/2170185 · Cited by 2,395
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203823064 · Cited by 2,077
Yuval‐Davis, N. (1997) · Cited by 2,031
Clifford, J. (1994) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.1525/can.1994.9.3.02a00040 · Cited by 1,891
Cited by
Where do I belong?: Narrating collective identity and translocational positionality
Anthias, F. (2002) · Ethnicities · doi:10.1177/14687968020020040301 · Cited by 470
Self-citationEssers, C., & Benschop, Y. (2009) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708101042 · Cited by 448
A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory
Dy, A. M., Marlow, S., & Martin, L. (2017) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726716650730 · Cited by 441
Mobilizing in transnational space: a social movement approach to the formation of diaspora
SOKEFELD, M. (2006) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00144.x · Cited by 431
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013) · Pedagogy, Culture & Society · doi:10.1080/14681366.2012.748676 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Anthias, F.
- Venue
- Ethnic and Racial Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 619-641
- ISSN
- 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4356
- OpenAlex
- W2090733135
- Cited by
- 440
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 76.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New hybridities, old concepts: the limits of 'culture'. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01419870120049815
- The paper
- Anthias, F. (2001). New hybridities, old concepts: the limits of 'culture'. Ethnic and Racial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120049815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
