Cited by 88Migration, Refugees, and IntegrationSocial and Intergroup PsychologyPopulism, Right-Wing Movements

When contact with immigrants matters: threat, interethnic attitudes and foreigner exclusionism in Spain's Comunidades Autónomas

Escandell, Xavier, Ceobanu, Alin M.·2009·Ethnic and Racial Studies

Abstract

This article examines the ‘contact hypothesis’ and theories of group threat in Spain, a country of recent mass immigration. Drawing on data for the period 1991–2000, we investigate whether respondents who interact with African and Latin American immigrants express lowered exclusionism compared to those who do not. Measures assessing contact include: close relationship, occasional encounter or acquaintanceship, and workplace contact. After multiple individual- and contextual-level controls, it is found that the close and occasional forms of contact are consistent predictors of lessened foreigner exclusionism across time, but workplace contact is not. Group threat (measured as perceived number of people with different nationality, race, religion or culture) contributes considerably to explaining variation in attitudes inter-regionally. Over time, close contact with migrants becomes a weaker predictor of reduced foreigner exclusionism. Finally, these results suggest that perceived threat is a consistent predictor of exclusionism over time, while the proportional presence of immigrants has no impact in either competitive or non-competitive settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01419870701846924

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Having friends and acquaintances who are immigrants may have positive effects on attitudes, but when not all optimal conditions for positive effects of contact are met, contact may have no or deleterious effects on attitudes toward immigrants.

    “Whereas having friends and acquaintances who are immigrants may have positive effects, when not all of the optimal conditions for positive effects of contact are met, contact may have no, or even deleterious, effects on attitudes toward immigrants (Escandell & Ceobanu 2009).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Escandell & Ceobanu 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Escandell, X., & Ceobanu, A. M.
Corresponding author
  • Escandell, Xavier
  • Ceobanu, Alin M.
Venue
Ethnic and Racial Studies
Published
2009-01
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
44-69
ISSN
  • 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4356
OpenAlex
W2044081583
Cited by
88
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Keywords
contact hypothesis, interethnic attitudes, group threat, African immigrants, Latin American immigrants, workplace contact, interregional variation, Spanish autonomous communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review