When contact with immigrants matters: threat, interethnic attitudes and foreigner exclusionism in Spain's Comunidades Autónomas
Abstract
This article examines the ‘contact hypothesis’ and theories of group threat in Spain, a country of recent mass immigration. Drawing on data for the period 1991–2000, we investigate whether respondents who interact with African and Latin American immigrants express lowered exclusionism compared to those who do not. Measures assessing contact include: close relationship, occasional encounter or acquaintanceship, and workplace contact. After multiple individual- and contextual-level controls, it is found that the close and occasional forms of contact are consistent predictors of lessened foreigner exclusionism across time, but workplace contact is not. Group threat (measured as perceived number of people with different nationality, race, religion or culture) contributes considerably to explaining variation in attitudes inter-regionally. Over time, close contact with migrants becomes a weaker predictor of reduced foreigner exclusionism. Finally, these results suggest that perceived threat is a consistent predictor of exclusionism over time, while the proportional presence of immigrants has no impact in either competitive or non-competitive settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Having friends and acquaintances who are immigrants may have positive effects on attitudes, but when not all optimal conditions for positive effects of contact are met, contact may have no or deleterious effects on attitudes toward immigrants.
“Whereas having friends and acquaintances who are immigrants may have positive effects, when not all of the optimal conditions for positive effects of contact are met, contact may have no, or even deleterious, effects on attitudes toward immigrants (Escandell & Ceobanu 2009).”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Escandell & Ceobanu 2009
Cites
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001 · see citing works
The Effect of Education on Nationalism and Ethnic Exclusionism: An International Comparison
Coenders, M., & Scheepers, P. (2003) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/0162-895x.00330 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants
Esses, V. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Gorodzeisky, A., & Semyonov, M. (2020) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2018.1550158 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
- Authors
- Escandell, X., & Ceobanu, A. M.
- Corresponding author
- Escandell, Xavier
- Ceobanu, Alin M.
- Venue
- Ethnic and Racial Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-69
- ISSN
- 0141-9870 (ISSN-L)
- 1466-4356
- OpenAlex
- W2044081583
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 19.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ethnic and Racial Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- contact hypothesis, interethnic attitudes, group threat, African immigrants, Latin American immigrants, workplace contact, interregional variation, Spanish autonomous communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review