How learning analytics can early predict under-achieving students in a blended medical education course
Abstract
AIM: Learning analytics (LA) is an emerging discipline that aims at analyzing students' online data in order to improve the learning process and optimize learning environments. It has yet un-explored potential in the field of medical education, which can be particularly helpful in the early prediction and identification of under-achieving students. The aim of this study was to identify quantitative markers collected from students' online activities that may correlate with students' final performance and to investigate the possibility of predicting the potential risk of a student failing or dropping out of a course. METHODS: This study included 133 students enrolled in a blended medical course where they were free to use the learning management system at their will. We extracted their online activity data using database queries and Moodle plugins. Data included logins, views, forums, time, formative assessment, and communications at different points of time. Five engagement indicators were also calculated which would reflect self-regulation and engagement. Students who scored below 5% over the passing mark were considered to be potentially at risk of under-achieving. RESULTS: At the end of the course, we were able to predict the final grade with 63.5% accuracy, and identify 53.9% of at-risk students. Using a binary logistic model improved prediction to 80.8%. Using data recorded until the mid-course, prediction accuracy was 42.3%. The most important predictors were factors reflecting engagement of the students and the consistency of using the online resources. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of students' online activities in a blended medical education course by means of LA techniques can help early predict underachieving students, and can be used as an early warning sign for timely intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Analysing the tools available would be beneficial for monitoring student retention rates, identifying underachieving students, predicting students' trends and attitudes, and accreditation purposes.
“Analysing the tools available would be beneficial for monitoring student retention rates (Monllaó Olivé et al., 2020), identifying underachieving students (Saqr et al., 2017), predicting students' trends and attitudes, and accreditation purposes (El Tantawi et al., 2015; Saleh & Salama, 2018; Strang, 2016).”
From A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning (2022) · cites this paper as Saqr et al., 2017
Data analytics is transforming formative assessment in medical education by providing detailed insights into student performance, enabling more personalized and effective teaching strategies.
“Data analytics is transforming formative assessment in medical education by providing detailed insights into student performance, enabling more personalized and effective teaching strategies [134].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [134]
Cites
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.038 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning
Gamage, S. H. P. W., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Karunaratne, T., Afzaal, M., & Saqr, M. (2020) · International Journal of Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence for Education (iJAI) · doi:10.3991/ijai.v2i2.17887 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation“A study of educational data mining: evidence from a Thai university,”
Trakunphutthirak, R., Cheung, Y., & Lee, V. C. S. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.3301734 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Lessons from the field: Isn't it just common sense? Naïve realism as a barrier to learning
Dyer, K. D. (2024) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12967 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saqr, M., Fors, U., & Tedre, M.
- Affiliations
- Qassim University (SA)
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Saqr, Mohammed
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-04-19
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 757-767
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2606704687
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 19.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEF eRepo (University of Eastern Finland) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- learning analytics, early prediction, blended learning, medical education, student engagement, online learning activities, virtual learning environments, Moodle, student dropout risk, student self-regulation, final grade prediction
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Learning, Students, Medical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review