Cited by 184Innovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and TrainingStudent Assessment and Feedback

Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback.

Sender Liberman, A., Liberman, Moishe, Steinert, Yvonne, McLeod, Peter, Meterissian, Sarkis·2005·Medical Teacher

Abstract

Feedback plays an important role in Postgraduate Medical Education and is indispensable in surgical training. Improvement in operating skills, for example, requires constant feedback between teacher and learner to promote reflection on performance. Prior to providing workshops on giving effective feedback, the goal of this study was to assess the perceptions of attending surgeons and residents on feedback practices in our program. We show a startling disparity in perceptions of feedback frequency and skills. The results were used in planning a Workshop on Giving Feedback for our faculty. The effectiveness of this Workshop will be assessed at a later date by administering the same questionnaire.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142590500129183

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 7 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sender Liberman, A., Liberman, M., Steinert, Y., McLeod, P., & Meterissian, S.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2005-08
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
470-472
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2151711082
Cited by
184
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
feedback, surgical training, attending surgeons, surgical residents, feedback frequency, operating skills, graduate medical education, faculty workshops
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Clerkship, Clinical Competence, Data Collection, Educational Measurement, Feedback, Hospitals, University, Humans, Internship and Residency, Medical Staff, Hospital, Quebec, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Perception, Specialties, Surgical, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review