The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character
Abstract
A transparent and theory-based scheme for analysing visual character is presented. Based on a literature review, nine key visual concepts are identified: stewardship, coherence, disturbance, historicity, visual scale, imageability, complexity, naturalness and ephemera. The nine visual concepts are presented in a framework of four levels of abstraction, described through the concepts' visual dimensions, landscape attributes contributing to the concepts and potential visual indicators suggested for mapping and quantifying the concepts. Each of these concepts focuses on different aspects of the landscape important for visual quality, where visual quality is an holistic experience of them all. The visual concepts presented are used to describe different characteristics of visual landscapes, rather than presenting a normative value for visual quality. It is believed that this framework can be important for landscape assessment and the compilation of landscape character.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution of Social Behavior
Alexander, R. D. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · Cited by 3,854
Webb, E., & Lowenthal, D. (1986) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1864381 · Cited by 3,632
Journal of environmental management
(1973) · Environmental Pollution (1970) · doi:10.1016/0013-9327(73)90062-1 · Cited by 2,461
Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment
Ulrich, R. S. (1983) · Behavior and the Natural Environment · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4 · Cited by 2,241
Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(02)00109-3 · Cited by 2,118
Bergman, E. F., & Appleton, J. (1978) · Geographical Review · doi:10.2307/213516 · Cited by 1,065
Cognition and environment : functioning in an uncertain world
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 928
Messy Ecosystems, Orderly Frames
Nassauer, J. I. (1995) · Landscape Journal · doi:10.3368/lj.14.2.161 · Cited by 891
Landscape perception: Research, application and theory
Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982) · Landscape Planning · doi:10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0 · Cited by 813
VIEWS OF NATURE AND SELF-DISCIPLINE: EVIDENCE FROM INNER CITY CHILDREN
TAYLOR, A. F., KUO, F. E., & SULLIVAN, W. C. (2002) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1006/jevp.2001.0241 · Cited by 698
Cited by
The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology?
Gobster, P. H., Nassauer, J. I., Daniel, T. C., & Fry, G. (2007) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x · Cited by 991
Self-citationAesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland
Junge, X., Schüpbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010 · Cited by 177
Preferences for European agrarian landscapes: A meta-analysis of case studies
van Zanten, B. T., Verburg, P. H., Koetse, M. J., & van Beukering, P. J. H. (2014) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.012 · Cited by 150
Conedera, M., Del Biaggio, A., Seeland, K., Moretti, M., & Home, R. (2015) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2015.01.003 · Cited by 112
A social–ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems
Andersson, E., Nykvist, B., Malinga, R., Jaramillo, F., & Lindborg, R. (2015) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0603-y · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Tveit, M., Ode, Å., & Fry, G.
- Venue
- Landscape Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 229-255
- ISSN
- 0142-6397 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9710
- OpenAlex
- W1989143359
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 24.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01426390600783269
- The paper
- Tveit, M., Ode, Å., & Fry, G. (2006). Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390600783269
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
