Cited by 6Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesRemote Sensing and Land UseAgglomeration and Urban Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barrier and corridor effects in cost-distance-based accessibility approximation for LUCC modelling: a case study of Slovakia from 2000 to 2018

Rusinko, Adam, Druga, Michal·2022·Landscape Research

Abstract

This paper tests the use of various barrier and corridor effects in cost distance calculation, which often serves as a proxy for accessibility in Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) models. The most suitable friction coefficients for barrier effects of slope and water, and corridor effect of roads, are identified by empirical sensitivity analysis. The influence of accessibility on urbanisation, agricultural intensification, and extensification, afforestation, and deforestation in Slovakia is modelled in the present study. The most significant improvement was achieved using the corridor effect of roads for accessibility to the nearest district town, while the barrier of slope significantly improved the effect of accessibility to the nearest commune. Different optimal friction coefficients were identified for different land cover changes; however, only some of them were sensitive to the change of coefficients.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01426397.2021.2009785

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bossard M., 2000, The revised and supplemented Corine land cover nomenclature
  2. Danielisová A., 2008, Počítačová podpora v archeologii II
  3. Falťan V., 2007, Geografický Časopis, 59, 359
  4. Feranec J., 2009, Central European Journal of Geosciences, 1, 106
  5. Feranec J., 2008, Geografický Časopis, 60, 113
  6. Lieskovský T., 2015, Archeologické predikčné modelovanie z pohľadu geoinformatiky, metódy a princípy
  7. Minár J., 1992, Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae, 33, 199
  8. Spiekermann K., 2015, European Spatial Planning Observation Network, 2, 264

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rusinko, A., & Druga, M.
Affiliations
  • Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
  • Department of Physical Geography and Geoinformatics, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
Corresponding author
Rusinko, Adam
Venue
Landscape Research
Published
2021-11-29
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
316-332
ISSN
  • 0142-6397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9710
OpenAlex
W3215291198
Cited by
6
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Landscape Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Slovak Research and Development Agency (APVV-15-0054)
  • Grant of Comenius University (UK/144/2021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Remote Sensing and Land Use
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agglomeration and Urban Systems
Keywords
land use and land cover change, accessibility (transport and spatial geography), cost distance, barrier effect, friction coefficient, slope, roads, urbanization, agricultural intensification, afforestation, deforestation, Slovakia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review