Cited by 15Reading and Literacy DevelopmentMultilingual Education and PolicyEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Linguistically responsive reciprocal teaching in primary school: effectiveness of an intervention study on students’ Reading competence

Open access
Decristan, Jasmin, Bertram, Victoria, Reitenbach, Valentina, Schneider, Katharina Maria, Köhler, Carmen, Rauch, Dominique Patricia·2024·Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development

Abstract

One shared goal of classroom instruction is to support students’ reading competence as a key skill of school success and participation in daily life. Yet, teaching that addresses multilingual students’ language-related resources to support reading is rare. In this study, we enriched reciprocal teaching with elements of linguistically responsive teaching (labelled LRRT) and conducted an intervention study in German primary schools (38 classes and 684 students) to examine its effects on reading competence. To assess reading competence, we used reading comprehension and reading strategy tests. Findings demonstrate the feasibility of our approach in regular primary school classes. Teachers and students highly valued the teaching unit as well. Results of latent mean difference score analysis confirmed the effectiveness of LRRT with respect to students’ reading strategy use but not with respect to their reading comprehension. Moreover, multilingual and monolingual students did not differ in their gains in reading competence. However, multilingual students’ different language use was of particular importance for gains in reading comprehension. The study thus provides further research on multilingualism as well as various stimuli for teachers of today’s heterogenous primary school classes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01434632.2022.2141757

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Decristan, J., Bertram, V., Reitenbach, V., Schneider, K. M., Köhler, C., & Rauch, D. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
  • Ludwigsburg University of Education (DE)
  • DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE)
Corresponding author
Decristan, Jasmin
Venue
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
Published
2022-11-11
Volume
45
Issue
10
Pages
4102-4120
ISSN
  • 0143-4632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-7557
OpenAlex
W4308842354
Cited by
15
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
linguistically responsive teaching, reciprocal teaching, reading skills, multilingual learners, reading comprehension, reading strategies, elementary school, intervention effectiveness, language use, heterogeneous classrooms, German primary schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review