Cited by 89Higher Education Research StudiesEvasion and Academic Success FactorsStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptability, engagement, and degree completion: a longitudinal investigation of university students

Open access
Holliman, A. J., Martin, A. J., Collie, R. J.·2018·Educational Psychology

Abstract

University entry and the passage through university is a time of great change. The extent to which students are able to adjust to successfully navigate this change (adaptability) is likely to influence their academic outcomes. Prior research has identified a link between university students’ adaptability and academic achievement via behavioural engagement. The current longitudinal study extends this research by examining whether university students’ adaptability predicts degree completion via behavioural engagement. Undergraduate students (N = 186) were surveyed for their adaptability and behavioural engagement at degree commencement. Their completion status was extracted from the University Records System at the end of the degree. Findings showed that adaptability predicts both positive and negative behavioural engagement, and that negative (but not positive) behavioural engagement predicts degree completion. Adaptability was also found to influence degree completion indirectly via negative behavioural engagement. These findings hold important theoretical and practical implications for educators and researchers seeking to understand how students manage the transition to university and the extent to, and mechanisms by which students’ adaptability is associated with university degree completion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01443410.2018.1426835

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1007/s11162-007-9064-5 · DOI
  2. 10.1353/hsj.2013.0000 · DOI
  3. Burns E. C., 2017, British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series,, 12, 111
  4. 10.1080/01443410.2016.1231296 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/01443410.2015.1093607 · DOI
  6. 10.1017/CBO9781139173582 · DOI
  7. Crosling G., 2009, Australian Universities’ Review, 51, 9
  8. Enochs W. K., 2006, College Student Journal, 40, 63
  9. 10.3102/00346543059002117 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1108/09684881211240295 · DOI
  11. Hart C., 2012, Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11, 19
  12. 10.1348/000709906X160778 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/10705519909540118 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/01443410.2014.893560 · DOI
  15. 10.1348/000709906X118036 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0013164409332214 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/03054980902934639 · DOI
  18. 10.1017/jgc.2012.8 · DOI
  19. 10.1037/a0032794 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.004 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/01443410.2016.1202904 · DOI
  22. Muller T., 2008, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9, 1, 10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.455 · DOI
  23. Muthén L. K., 2015, Mplus user’s guide
  24. 10.3200/JEXE.76.4.343-362 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1037/a0035832 · DOI
  26. 10.1177/0013164408323233 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.01.004 · DOI
  28. Winne P. H., 2008, Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and application, 297
  29. Yazzie-Mintz E., 2007, Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 high school survey of student engagement
  30. 10.1080/01443410.2014.895297 · DOI
  31. Zimmerman B. J., 2002, Academic motivation of adolescents, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Holliman, A. J., Martin, A. J., & Collie, R. J.
Affiliations
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Holliman, A. J.
Venue
Educational Psychology
Published
2018-01-15
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
785-799
ISSN
  • 0144-3410 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5820
OpenAlex
W2784085688
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
FWCI
21.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
adaptability, behavioral engagement, graduation, university students, transition to college, academic performance, student adaptation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review