Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students' experienced socio-psychological well-being
Abstract
This paper explores doctoral students' experiences of their scholarly communities in terms of socio-psychological well-being. Further, the study examines how experiences were related to study engagement and to self-reported stress, exhaustion, and anxiety. Altogether 669 doctoral students from the University of Helsinki, Finland, responded a survey. The answers to an open-ended question were content analysed and then statistically compared to well-being and study engagement items. The results showed that there was variation in students' experiences of the scholarly community regarding socio-psychological well-being. More than half of the answers, where students had explicitly described their experience (n = 383), emphasised the scholarly community as source of burden (56%), but experiences of inspiration and empowerment were also frequently reported in the answers (44%). Feelings of empowerment were positively related to study engagement and negatively related to stress, exhaustion, and anxiety.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a Finnish study of 383 PhD students, 44% reported the academic community as a source of empowerment, enthusiasm and inspiration, while 56% experienced it as a source of burden.
“In a Finnish study of 383 PhD students, Stubb et al. (2011) found that 44% reported the academic community as a source of empowerment, enthusiasm and inspiration, while 56% experienced it as a source of burden.”
From Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students (2017) · cites this paper as Stubb et al. (2011)
The few studies on PhD students suggest that stress may stem from various problems in the PhD process, such as problems concerning one's own learning, different aspects of insecurity, frequent evaluation, competitive atmosphere, supervision, relationships to faculty and peers, workload and work-life interface.
“The few studies on PhD students suggest that stress may stem from various problems in the PhD process, such as problems concerning one's own learning, different aspects of insecurity (financial insecurity, insecurity concerning unwritten rules), frequent evaluation, competitive atmosphere, supervision, relationships to faculty and peers, workload and work-life interface (Appel and Dahlgren, 2003;K”
From Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students (2017) · cites this paper as Stubb et al., 2011
Cites
The measurement of experienced burnout
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030020205 · Cited by 14,496 · see citing works
On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567 · see citing works
Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions.
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007 · Cited by 3,322 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The reported experiences would be those of well-being, satisfaction and full-functioning (Keyes, Shmotkin, and Ryff 2002; Ryff and Singer 2000; Ryan and Deci 2001; Sheldon and Bettencourt 2002).”
BackgroundBurnout and work engagement among teachers
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001 · Cited by 3,067 · see citing works
Gender and doctoral studies: the perceptions of Ph.D. students in an American university
Kurtz‐Costes, B., Andrews Helmke, L., & Ülkü‐Steiner, B. (2006) · Gender and Education · doi:10.1080/09540250500380513 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
MED NORD–A tool for measuring medical students’ well-being and study orientations
Lonka, K., Sharafi, P., Karlgren, K., Masiello, I., Nieminen, J., BirgegÅrd, G., & Josephson, A. (2008) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701769555 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students
Levecque, K., Anseel, F., De Beuckelaer, A., Van der Heyden, J., & Gisle, L. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008 · Cited by 1,182 · see citing works
The experienced meaning of working with a PhD thesis
Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K. (2012) · Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.599422 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Stubb, J., Pyhältö, K., & Lonka, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Stubb, J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Studies in Continuing Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-02-08
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 33-50
- ISSN
- 0158-037X (ISSN-L)
- 1470-126X
- OpenAlex
- W2083333183
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Studies in Continuing Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Helsingin Yliopisto
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- doctoral students, psychosocial well-being, academic community, study engagement, stress, exhaustion, anxiety, empowerment, inspiration, doctoral education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review