The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education
Abstract
Faculty satisfaction is considered an important factor of quality in online courses. A study was conducted to identify and confirm factors affecting the satisfaction of online faculty at a small research university, and to develop and validate an instrument that can be used to measure perceived faculty satisfaction in the context of the online learning environment. The online faculty satisfaction survey (OFSS) was developed and administered to all instructors who had taught an online course in fall 2007 or spring 2008 at a small research university in the USA. One hundred and two individuals completed the web‐based questionnaire. Results confirm that three factors affect satisfaction of faculty in the online environment: student‐related, instructor‐related, and institution‐related factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited.
Feldman, K. A., & Astin, A. W. (1994) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.2307/2943781 · Cited by 5,745
Cohen, D. (1998) · The Women's Review of Books · doi:10.2307/4022859 · Cited by 4,261
Distance education : a systems view
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,665
Quarterly Review of Distance Education
Clark, R. E. (2002) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/bf03651763 · Cited by 1,627
Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587910500081269 · Cited by 1,219
Liaw, S.-S. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005 · Cited by 1,116
Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education
Simonson, M. R. (2008) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 801
Online Nation: Five Years of Growth in Online Learning.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2007) · Cited by 765
(2000) · The chronicle of higher education · Cited by 761
Astin, A. W. (1993) · Cited by 736
Cited by
Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning
Graham, C. R. (2015) · Handbook of Distance Education · doi:10.4324/9780203803738.ch21 · Cited by 579
Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090 · Cited by 346
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v21i1.761 · Cited by 328
Chronicling engagement: students’ experience of online learning over time
Muir, T., Milthorpe, N., Stone, C., Dyment, J., Freeman, E., & Hopwood, B. (2019) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1600367 · Cited by 158
Cole, A. W., Anderson, C., Bunton, T., Cherney, M. R., Cronin Fisher, V., Draeger, Jr., Featherston, M., Motel, L., Nicolini, K. M., Peck, B., et al. (2017) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.966 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O.
- Venue
- Distance Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-116
- ISSN
- 0158-7919 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-0198
- OpenAlex
- W2138661579
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 78.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01587910902845949
- The paper
- Bolliger, D. U., & Wasilik, O. (2009). Factors influencing faculty satisfaction with online teaching and learning in higher education. Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
