The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND DEFINITION OF BLENDED LEARNING Discussion of blending learning (BL) is appearing with increased frequency in both the scholarly literature and the popular press. A 2011 literature search by the author found close to 200 dissertations and hundreds of journal articles on the topic (Halverson, Graham, Spring, & Drysdale, 2012). It has also been identifi ed by the American Society for Training and Development as a top trend in the knowledge delivery industry (Rooney, 2003). Historically, blended learning was predominantly found in corporate and higher education contexts, but its use is now increasingly found in K-12 education (Picciano, Seaman, Shea, & Shaw 2012; Staker et al., 2011). Its use in higher education has grown rapidly and is predicted to become the “new traditional model” (Ross & Gage, 2006, p. 167) or the “new normal” in course delivery (Norberg, Dziuban, & Moskal, 2011, p. 207). A 2008 report sponsored by the North American Council for Online Learning (NACOL) stated, “Blended learning is likely to emerge as the predominant model of the future” (Watson, 2008, p. 3).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
(1983) · Cited by 33,192
(1999) · Cited by 12,812
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847
(2009) · US Department of Education · Cited by 3,654
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715
Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology
Laurillard, D. (1993) · Cumulative Index of Computer Aided Architectural Design · Cited by 2,381
Instructional Design Theories and Models
(1983) · doi:10.4324/9780203824283 · Cited by 2,192
Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions
Graham, C. R. (2006) · Cited by 1,767
Self-citationBlended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines
Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118269558 · Cited by 1,609
Cited by
Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies
Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5 · Cited by 1,252
Self-citationCheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 · Cited by 494
Anthony, B., Kamaludin, A., Romli, A., Raffei, A. F. M., Phon, D. N. A. L. E., Abdullah, A., & Ming, G. L. (2022) · Technology, Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z · Cited by 312
Rethinking Education in the New Normal Post-COVID-19 Era: A Curriculum Studies Perspective
Cahapay, M. B. (2020) · Aquademia · doi:10.29333/aquademia/8315 · Cited by 306
Institutional drivers and barriers to faculty adoption of blended learning in higher education
Porter, W. W., & Graham, C. R. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12269 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, C. R.
- Venue
- Handbook of Distance Education
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-17
- OpenAlex
- W178425693
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 183.58
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203803738.ch21
- The paper
- Graham, C. R. (2015). Emerging Practice and Research in Blended Learning. Handbook of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203803738.ch21
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
