The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges
Open accessAbstract
Online learning has become the new normal in many medical and health science schools worldwide, courtesy of COVID-19. Satisfaction with online learning is a significant aspect of promoting successful educational processes. This study aimed to identify factors affecting student and faculty satisfaction with online learning during the new normal. Online questionnaires were emailed to students (n = 370) and faculty (n = 81) involved in online learning during the pandemic. The questionnaires included closed- and open-ended questions and were organised into two parts: socio-demographic information and satisfaction with online learning. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the responses to the satisfaction scales. Students' and faculty responses to the open-ended questions were analysed using the thematic analysis method. The response rate was 97.8% for students and 86.4% for faculty. Overall satisfaction among students was 41.3% compared to 74.3% for faculty. The highest areas of satisfaction for students were communication and flexibility, whereas 92.9% of faculty were satisfied with students' enthusiasm for online learning. Technical problems led to reduced student satisfaction, while faculty were hampered by the higher workload and the required time to prepare the teaching and assessment materials. Study-load and workload, enhancing engagement, and technical issues (SWEET) were the themes that emerged from the thematic analysis as affecting student and faculty satisfaction. Adopting a combination synchronous and asynchronous approach, incorporating different applications to engage students, and timely feedback are imperative to increasing student satisfaction, while institutional support and organisational policy could enhance faculty satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective
Bandura, A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 · Cited by 15,510
The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods
Given, L. (2008) · doi:10.4135/9781412963909 · Cited by 6,134
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092 · Cited by 1,424
Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study
Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa'deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004 · Cited by 1,350
A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment
Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012 · Cited by 1,001
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_311 · Cited by 885
Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems
Wang, Y.-S. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(03)00028-4 · Cited by 718
COVID-19 and medical education
Ahmed, H., Allaf, M., & Elghazaly, H. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30226-7 · Cited by 685
AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment
Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590802108331 · Cited by 652
E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study
Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001 · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E.
- Venue
- Medical Education Online
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1920090-1920090
- ISSN
- 1087-2981 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3161099086
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 131.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090
- The paper
- Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.