Cited by 17Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementUrban and Freight Transport Logistics

An analytical model to investigate the economic and environmental benefits of a supply chain resource-sharing scheme based on collaborative consolidation centres

Antheaume, Nicolas, Thiel, Daniel, de Corbière, François, Rowe, Frantz, Takeda, Hiro·2018·Journal of the Operational Research Society

Abstract

This study evaluates the cost and carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of different supply chain configurations to determine when suppliers should move to a greener resource-sharing scheme. We build an analytical model based on a case study of a retailer that has developed a resource-sharing initiative introducing collaborative consolidation centres (CCC) between its suppliers and its warehouses (WH). We compare the costs and carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions of using a pair of CCCs with direct delivery to twenty WHs. Our parameters include the distances between suppliers, CCCs, and WHs, in addition to the volumes delivered. This model determines when there should be a switch to the CCC system. We also compare the actual CCC locations with better alternatives, the centres of gravity of the regions. On a real cost basis, economic gains, but not environmental ones, occur, highlighting a need for alternative models for optimal locations, which would include economic and environmental constraints.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01605682.2017.1415638

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antheaume, N., Thiel, D., de Corbière, F., Rowe, F., & Takeda, H.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire d'Economie et de Management de Nantes Atlantique (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • LEMNA, Institut Mines Telecom Atlantique, Nantes, France
  • SKEMA Business School (FR)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Antheaume, Nicolas
Venue
Journal of the Operational Research Society
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
1888-1902
ISSN
  • 0160-5682 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9360
OpenAlex
W2905285287
Cited by
17
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Operational Research Society (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • French Ministry for Transport
  • French Agency for Environment and Energy Management
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
Keywords
CO2 emissions, freight consolidation, warehouse location, green logistics, cost-benefit analysis, facility location, analytical model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review