Cited by 40Nursing care and researchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

CONTINUUM OF CARE FOR ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE: A NURSE EDUCATION AND COUNSELING PROGRAM

Wright, Lore K., Litaker, Mark, Laraia, Michele T., DeAndrade, Susan·2001·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

This study evaluated a one year long course education and counseling program with 93 family caregivers of elders afflicted with Alzheimer's disease. The elders had received treatment for agitation in an inpatient setting and were subsequently discharged to the caregivers' home. Caregivers were randomly assigned to an experimental group (n = 68) and a control group (n = 25). Baseline assessments (Time 0) were conducted while the elder was an inpatient. Postdischarge interventions and assessments were conducted at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 and 12 months (Times 1-5 respectively). There were no significant treatment effects for care recipient agitation, caregiver stress, depression, and physical health, and no significant differences between groups in rates of institutionalization for afflicted elders. Longitudinal data, however, revealed several important trends. Afflicted elders' agitation rose steadily for control group subjects at Times 3 through 5 but declined for experimental group subjects. Caregiver depression increased for control group subjects at Time 5, but declined for experimental group subjects. Caregiver physical health declined for control group subjects at Times 4 and 5 but was maintained for experimental group subjects. A significantly higher number of afflicted elders were still at home among experimental group subjects at the end of the one year study. The difficulties in demonstrating efficacy of interventions with family caregivers of Alzheimer's disease are discussed. Finally, the issue of data collection being perceived as support by control group subjects is evaluated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840152053084

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, L. K., Litaker, M., Laraia, M. T., & DeAndrade, S.
Affiliations
Augusta University (US)
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
231-252
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W2161208729
Cited by
40
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, family caregivers, caregiver education, caregiver counseling, agitation, caregiver stress, caregiver depression, caregiver physical health, institutionalization, home care, hospital discharge, intervention efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Continuity of Patient Care, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nursing Assessment, Patient Discharge, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review