Cited by 342Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia

Selwood, A., Johnston, K., Katona, C., Lyketsos, C., Livingston, G.·2007·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Caregivers of people with dementia are at high risk of psychological morbidity and associated breakdown in care. Many psychologically based interventions have been designed to help caregivers of people with dementia. More work is needed to identify which, if any, are helpful for such caregivers.Method We conducted a systematic review of the immediate and long term efficacy of different types of psychological interventions for the psychological health of caregivers of people with dementia, using standardized criteria, to assist clinicians in implementing rational, evidence-based management recommendations. We reviewed studies examining the effects of any therapy derived from a psychological approach that satisfied pre-specified criteria. Using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria we rated the quality of each study, extracted data and gave overall ratings to different types of intervention.Results We identified 244 references in our search of which 62 met our inclusion criteria.Limitations Our findings are limited by lack of good quality evidence, with only ten level 1 studies identified.Conclusions We found excellent evidence for the efficacy of six or more sessions of individual behavioral management therapy centered on the care recipient's behavior in alleviating caregiver symptoms both immediately and for up to 32 months. Teaching caregivers coping strategies either individually or in a group also appeared effective in improving caregiver psychological health both immediately and for some months afterwards. Group interventions were less effective than individual interventions. Education about dementia by itself, group behavioral therapy and supportive therapy were not effective caregiver interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2006.10.025

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Selwood, A., Johnston, K., Katona, C., Lyketsos, C., & Livingston, G.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Kent (GB)
Corresponding author
Selwood, A.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
101
Issue
1-3
Pages
75-89
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970959510
Cited by
342
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
dementia, family caregivers, psychological intervention, caregiver burden, coping strategies, group intervention, individual interventions, caregiver mental health, dementia education, supportive therapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Anxiety, Depression, Humans, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Cost of Illness, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review