Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using the Epidemic of Academic Dishonesty as an Opportunity for Character Education: A Three-Year Mixed Methods Study (with Mixed Results)

Stephens, Jason M., Wangaard, David B.·2013·Peabody Journal of Education

Abstract

Academic dishonesty among high school students has long since transformed into an epidemic that affects nearly every student, compromising not only their intellectual growth but also their moral development. Yet, beyond the occasional hand-wringing in the media, the problem has been largely ignored by teachers, schools, policymakers, and even character educators. To address this notable failure to respond, the authors developed and evaluated a character education program that sought to use the epidemic of academic dishonesty as an opportunity to reduce cheating and promote integrity. The present article describes the core components and central mechanisms of this schoolwide program as well as results from a 3-year mixed methods study of its implementation at 3 high schools in the Northeastern United States. These results and their implications are discussed in detail. The article also outlines suggestions for further program development and research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0161956x.2013.775868

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.1.84 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/B978-012372541-7/50002-4 · DOI
  4. Becket , L. 2011 September 19 . America's most outrageous teacher cheating scandals . ProPublica , Retrieved from http://www.propublica.org/
  5. 10.1159/000048157 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0033-2909.88.1.1 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0273-2297(83)90029-1 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Blasi , A. 1984 . “ Moral identity: Its role in moral functioning ” . In Morality, moral behavior, and moral development , Edited by: Kurtines , W. M. and Gewirtz , J. L. 128 – 139 . New York , NY : Wiley .
  9. Bowers , W. J. 1964 . Student dishonesty and its control in college , New York , NY : Columbia Bureau of Applied Research .
  10. Callahan , D. 2004 . The cheating culture: Why More Americans are doing wrong to get ahead , New York , NY : Harcourt .
  11. The Center for Academic Integrity . 1999 . The fundamental values of academic integrity Retrieved from http://www.academicintegrity.org/icai/resources-2.php
  12. 10.3102/0013189X034005014 · DOI
  13. 10.1017/CBO9781139173582 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/0305724042000215276 · DOI
  15. Epidemic . n.d. . Merriam-Webster.com Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/epidemic
  16. Gould , D. B. L. and Roberts , J. J. 2007 . A handbook for developing and sustaining honor codes , Portland , OR : Council for Spiritual and Ethical Education .
  17. 10.1007/BF00992130 · DOI
  18. Hall , G. E. and Hord , S. M. 1987 . Change in schools: Facilitating the process , Albany : State University of New York Press .
  19. 10.1007/s11948-004-0027-3 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1006/ceps.2001.1088 · DOI
  21. 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_3 · DOI
  22. Josephson , M. and Mertz , M. 2004 . Honor above all , Los Angeles , CA : Josephson Institute of Ethics .
  23. Josephson Institute of Ethics . 2009 . A study of values and behavior concerning integrity: The impact of age, cynicism and high school character Retrieved from http://josephsoninstitute.org/surveys/index.html
  24. Josephson Institute of Ethics . 2011 . The ethics of American youth: 2010 Retrieved from http://charactercounts.org/programs/reportcard/2010/installment02_report-card_honesty-integrity.html
  25. McCabe , D. L. and Bowers , W. J. 1994 . Academic dishonesty among males in college: A thirty year perspective . Journal of College Student Development , 35 : 5 – 10 .
  26. 10.1080/00221546.1993.11778446 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1080/00091383.1996.10544253 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/00221546.1999.11780762 · DOI
  29. 10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1006/ceps.2000.1046 · DOI
  31. 10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.229 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s11162-004-5952-0 · DOI
  33. Schab , F. 1991 . Schooling without learning: Thirty years of cheating in high school . Adolescence , 26 : 839 – 847 .
  34. 10.1016/B978-012372541-7/50009-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/03055690802257127 · DOI
  36. Stephens , J. M. and Roeser , R. W. Quantity of motivation and qualities of classrooms: A person-centered comparative analysis of cheating in high school . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Chicago, IL
  37. 10.1080/10508420701519197 · DOI
  38. Strauss , A. L. and Corbin , J. 1998 . Basics of qualitative research: Techniques ands procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.) , Thousand Oaks , CA : Sage .
  39. Wangaard , D. B. and Stephens , J. M. 2011 . Creating a culture of academic integrity: A tool kit for secondary schools , Minneapolis , MN : Search Institute .
  40. 10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.411 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/10508420701519312 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stephens, J. M., & Wangaard, D. B.
Venue
Peabody Journal of Education
Published
2013-04
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
159-179
ISSN
  • 0161-956X
  • 1532-7930
Cited by
21
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review