Cited by 625Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceProbability and Statistical ResearchForecasting Techniques and Applications

The Well-Calibrated Bayesian

Dawid, A. P.·1982·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Suppose that a forecaster sequentially assigns probabilities to events. He is well calibrated if, for example, of those events to which he assigns a probability 30 percent, the long-run proportion that actually occurs turns out to be 30 percent. We prove a theorem to the effect that a coherent Bayesian expects to be well calibrated, and consider its destructive implications for the theory of coherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1982.10477856

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dawid, A. P.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Dawid, A. P.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1982-09
Volume
77
Issue
379
Pages
605-610
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2023943903
Cited by
625
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
well calibration, Bayesian forecasting, coherence, subjective probability, Dutch book argument

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review