Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 537

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptive Cluster Sampling

Thompson, Steven K.·1990·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

In many real-world sampling situations, researchers would like to be able to adaptively increase sampling effort in the vicinity of observed values that are high or otherwise interesting. This article describes sampling designs in which, whenever an observed value of a selected unit satisfies a condition of interest, additional units are added to the sample from the neighborhood of that unit. If any of these additional units satisfies the condition, still more units may be added. Sampling designs such as these, in which the selection procedure is allowed to depend on observed values of the variable of interest, are in contrast to conventional designs, in which the entire selection of units to be included in the sample may be determined prior to making any observations. Because the adaptive selection procedure introduces biases into conventional estimators, several estimators are given that are design unbiased for the population mean with the adaptive cluster designs of this article; that is, the unbiasedness does not depend on any assumptions about the population. The Rao-Blackwell method is used to obtain improved unbiased estimators; because of the incompleteness of the minimal sufficient statistic, more than one of these improved estimators are obtained. Simple criteria are given determining when adaptive cluster sampling strategies are more efficient than simple random sampling of equivalent sample size. Motivation for the designs in this article is provided by a wide variety of sampling situations in fields such as ecology, geology, and epidemiology. For example, in a survey of a rare bird species, once individuals of the species are detected, additional observations at nearby sites often reveal more individuals. In a study of a contagious disease, the addition to the sample of close contacts of infected individuals reveals a higher than average incidence rate. The results and examples in this article show that adaptive cluster sampling strategies give lower variance than conventional strategies for certain types of populations and, in particular, provide an extremely effective way of sampling rare, clustered populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.1990.10474975

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 537

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, S. K.
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
1990-12
Volume
85
Issue
412
Pages
1050-1059
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2092322680
Cited by
537
References
22
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive Cluster Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01621459.1990.10474975
The paper
Thompson, S. K. (1990). Adaptive Cluster Sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1990.10474975

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.