Cited by 36Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyStatistical Methods and ApplicationsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

A geometric perspective on the power of principal component association tests in multiple phenotype studies

Open access
Liu, Zhonghua, Lin, Xihong·2019·Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract

Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes can increase statistical power in genetic association studies. Principal component analysis, as a popular dimension reduction method, especially when the number of phenotypes is high dimensional, has been proposed to analyze multiple correlated phenotypes. It has been empirically observed that the first PC, which summarizes the largest amount of variance, can be less powerful than higher-order PCs and other commonly used methods in detecting genetic association signals. In this article, we investigate the properties of PCA-based multiple phenotype analysis from a geometric perspective by introducing a novel concept called principal angle. A particular PC is powerful if its principal angle is 0° and is powerless if its principal angle is 90°. Without prior knowledge about the true principal angle, each PC can be powerless. We propose linear, nonlinear, and data-adaptive omnibus tests by combining PCs. We demonstrate that the Wald test is a special quadratic PC-based test. We show that the omnibus PC test is robust and powerful in a wide range of scenarios. We study the properties of the proposed methods using power analysis and eigen-analysis. The subtle differences and close connections between these combined PC methods are illustrated graphically in terms of their rejection boundaries. Our proposed tests have convex acceptance regions and hence are admissible. The p-values for the proposed tests can be efficiently calculated analytically and the proposed tests have been implemented in a publicly available R package MPAT. We conduct simulation studies in both low- and high-dimensional settings with various signal vectors and correlation structures. We apply the proposed tests to the joint analysis of metabolic syndrome-related phenotypes with datasets collected from four international consortia to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed combined PC testing procedures. Supplementary materials for this article, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work, are available as an online supplement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01621459.2018.1513363

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These PC-based statistics do not apply to our settings with multiple covariates.

    “In particular, SiMMR-PC resembles PC-based test statistics in the multiple phenotype setting with multiple outcome variables and a single covariate (Liu and Lin 2019); but these statistics do not apply to our settings with multiple covariates.”

    From Similarity-based multimodal regression (2024) · cites this paper as Liu and Lin 2019

    The Principal Component Association Tests section describes testing one SNP at a time across multiple phenotypes, which supports the distinction from a test of multiple predictors jointly. But it also explicitly says the Z-scores account for other covariates included in the single-phenotype analyses. Thus the paper does not support the unqualified claim that its statistics cannot apply when multiple covariates are present; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SiMMR-PC resembles PC-based test statistics in the multiple phenotype setting with multiple outcome variables and a single covariate.

    “In particular, SiMMR-PC resembles PC-based test statistics in the multiple phenotype setting with multiple outcome variables and a single covariate (Liu and Lin 2019); but these statistics do not apply to our settings with multiple covariates.”

    From Similarity-based multimodal regression (2024) · cites this paper as Liu and Lin 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mosteller F, Bush RR, and Green BF (1954). Selected quantitative techniques. Addison-Wesley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, Z., & Lin, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhonghua
Venue
Journal of the American Statistical Association
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
114
Issue
527
Pages
975-990
ISSN
  • 0162-1459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-274X
OpenAlex
W2963607751
Cited by
36
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Statistical Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CA R35-CA197449, P01-CA134294, U01-HG009088, U19-CA203654)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
principal component analysis, genetic association testing, statistical power, principal angles, omnibus test, Wald test, critical region, dimensionality reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review