The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Case‐control study of dietary etiological factors: The Melbourne colorectal cancer study
Abstract
As part of a large-scale investigation of colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence, etiology, and survival, a case-control study was conducted to identify dietary factors associated with the risk of CRC. The study compared 715 cases with 727 age- and sex-matched community controls. A quantitative diet history, assessed to be the most representative of the previous 20 years, was obtained from each subject and analyzed for both food groups and nutrients. The combination of a high-fiber and high-vegetable intake was found to be protective against large bowel cancer. Cruciferous vegetable intake was also found, although with less certainty, to be protective. Dietary vitamin C was protective for estimated intakes greater than 230 mg/day. Dietary Beta-carotene had no separate association with the risk of CRC. Beef intake was a risk factor in males but not in females. Fat intake was a risk factor for both males and females. A low intake of milk drinks was a risk for both males and females. A high intake of pork and fish was protective. The use of vitamin supplements was highly protective. A risk score, which was calculated as the number of risk factors an individual has in his or her diet, showed an increasing monotonic relationship with risk of CRC. The effects of the dietary variables were similar for colon and rectal cancer and, with the exception of beef, were similar for males and females.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Dietary History as a Tool in Research1
BURKE, B. S. (1947) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(21)43949-0 · Cited by 625
Cited by
Vegetables, Fruit, and Cancer Prevention
STEINMETZ, K. A., & POTTER, J. D. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00273-8 · Cited by 2,118
Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. I. Epidemiology
Steinmetz, K. A., & Potter, J. D. (1991) · Cancer Causes and Control · doi:10.1007/bf00051672 · Cited by 1,118
Indexes of Overall Diet Quality
KANT, A. K. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00217-9 · Cited by 650
Adherence to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and risk of major chronic disease in men
McCullough, M. L., Feskanich, D., Rimm, E. B., Giovannucci, E. L., Ascherio, A., Variyam, J. N., Spiegelman, D., Stampfer, M. J., & Willett, W. C. (2000) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/72.5.1223 · Cited by 403
Kirby, S. D., Baranowski, T., Reynolds, K. D., Taylor, G., & Binkley, D. (1995) · Journal of Nutrition Education · doi:10.1016/s0022-3182(12)80794-1 · Cited by 157
Friedenreich, C. M., Brant, R. F., & Riboli, E. (1994) · Epidemiology · doi:10.1097/00001648-199401000-00011 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Kune, S., Kune, G. A., & Watson, L. F.
- Venue
- Nutrition and Cancer
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-42
- ISSN
- 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7914
- OpenAlex
- W2079118665
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.