Cited by 423Nutritional Studies and DietFood composition and propertiesCancer Risks and Factors

Whole‐grain intake and cancer: An expanded review and meta‐analysis

Jacobs, David R., Marquart, Leonard, Slavin, Joanne, Kushi, Lawrence H.·1998·Nutrition and Cancer

Abstract

Whole grains are nutrient rich and may protect against chronic disease. To study this, we previously reviewed 14 case-control studies of colorectal, gastric, and endometrial cancers and found consistently lower risk in those with high than in those with low whole-grain intake. Questions remained concerning other cancers, dietary assessment, quantity consumed, confounding, and differential study quality. Here we expand the review to 40 case-control studies of 20 cancers and colon polyps. Odds ratios are < 1 for 46 of 51 mentions of whole-grain intake and for 43 of 45 after exclusion of 6 mentions with design/reporting flaws or low intake. The pooled odds ratio for high vs. low whole-grain intake among the 45 mentions was 0.66 (95% confidence interval = 0.60-0.72); they range from 0.59 to 0.78 across four types of dietary questionnaires. Odds ratios were < 1 in 9 of 10 mentions of studies of colorectal cancers and polyps, 7 of 7 mentions of gastric and 6 of 6 mentions of other digestive tract cancers, 7 of 7 mentions of hormone-related cancers, 4 of 4 mentions of pancreatic cancer, and 10 of 11 mentions of 8 other cancers. Most pooled odds ratios for specific cancers were in the range of 0.5-0.8, notable exceptions being breast (0.86) and prostate (0.90). The pooled odds ratio was similar in studies that adjusted for few and many covariates. Dose-response associations were stronger in studies using food-frequency questionnaires than in more quantitative questionnaires. The case-control evidence is supportive of the hypothesis that whole-grain intake protects against various cancers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01635589809514647

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jacobs, D. R., Marquart, L., Slavin, J., & Kushi, L. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • General Mills (United States) (US)
Venue
Nutrition and Cancer
Published
1998-01
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
85-96
ISSN
  • 0163-5581 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7914
OpenAlex
W2089343966
Cited by
423
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 23
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition and Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
whole grain intake, cancer risk, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, endometrial cancer, colonic polyps, digestive tract cancer, hormone-dependent tumors, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, dose-response relationship, food frequency questionnaire, dietary assessment, confounding
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Edible Grain, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review