Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 519

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance as a Measure of Frontal Lobe Damage

Anderson, Steven W., Damasio, Hanna, Jones, R. Dallas, Tranel, Daniel·1991·Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Abstract

We examined the sensitivity and specificity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) as a measure of frontal lobe damage in 91 subjects with stable focal brain lesions. Anatomical information about the location and extent of brain damage was obtained from MR and CT transparencies. No significant differences in WCST performance were found between subjects with frontal vs. nonfrontal damage. Some subjects with extensive frontal lobe damage performed well on the WCST, and some subjects with damage outside of the frontal lobes failed. The optimal cutoff scores for discriminating frontal from nonfrontal subjects correctly classified only 62% of the subjects. Further analysis of WCST performances associated with damage to various subregions of the frontal lobes also failed to reveal any reliable relationships. These findings indicate that performance on the WCST cannot be interpreted in isolation as an index of frontal lobe damage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01688639108405107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Anderson S. W., 1990, Archives of Neurology, 47, 397, 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530040039017 · DOI
  2. Anderson S. W., 1988, Society for Neuroscience, 14, 1288
  3. 10.1080/00221309.1948.9918159 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Damasio A. R., 1985, Clinical Neuropsychology, 339
  5. Damasio H., 1989, Lesion analysis in neuropsychology
  6. 10.1016/S0010-9452(74)80006-7 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/h0059831 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Heaton R. K., 1981, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Manual
  9. 10.1080/01688638608401321 · DOI
  10. 10.1001/archneur.1963.00460070100010 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Rosvold H. E., 1964, The frontal granular cortex and behavior, 332
  12. 10.1037/h0054430 · DOI
  13. Stuss D. T., 1986, The frontal lobes
  14. 10.1097/00005053-195111450-00006 · DOI
  15. Wechsler D., 1981, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale ‐Revised
  16. 10.1037/h0055544 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800020020004 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1037/h0056082 · DOI

Cited by

See all 519

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., Jones, R. D., & Tranel, D.
Venue
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
Published
1991-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
909-922
ISSN
  • 0165-0475 (ISSN-L)
  • 0168-8634
OpenAlex
W2039861945
Cited by
519
References
1
FWCI
19.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance as a Measure of Frontal Lobe Damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01688639108405107
The paper
Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., Jones, R. D., & Tranel, D. (1991). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test Performance as a Measure of Frontal Lobe Damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639108405107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.