The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production
Open accessAbstract
The DIVA model of speech production provides a computationally and neuroanatomically explicit account of the network of brain regions involved in speech acquisition and production. An overview of the model is provided along with descriptions of the computations performed in the different brain regions represented in the model. The latest version of the model, which contains a new right-lateralised feedback control map in ventral premotor cortex, will be described, and experimental results that motivated this new model component will be discussed. Application of the model to the study and treatment of communication disorders will also be briefly described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These results suggest that inner speech production is associated with a time-locked and content-specific internal forward model, similar to the one that operates in the production of overt speech.”
From Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech (2017) · cites this paper as Tourville and Guenther, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The lack of convergence in L-IFG is of interest as it is invariably a part of the corollary discharge network according to computational and neuroanatomical models of speech production (Chen et al., 2011; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
From Bridging phenomenology and neural mechanisms of inner speech: ALE meta-analysis on egocentricity and spontaneity in a dual-mechanistic framework (2023) · cites this paper as Tourville & Guenther, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295 · cited 2×
“Similarly, comparisons of auditory responses during self-produced speech and while listening to recordings of one’s own speech indicate attenuation of auditory cortex responses during speech production (Curio, Neuloh, Numminen, Jousmaki, & Hari, 2000; Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005;…”
Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 · Cited by 4,870 · cited 1×
“1 Performance of these motor programs relies on contributions from bilateral premotor, motor, and subcortical regions (see below), areas that are active bilaterally during normal speech production.”
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.
Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., Kennedy, D. N., Hoppel, B. E., Cohen, M. S., & Turner, R. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 · Cited by 4,212 · cited 2×
“Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Belliveau et al., 1992; Kwong et al., 1992; Ogawa et al.,”
Editorial Office (1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,941
Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00230027 · Cited by 3,539
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 2×
“Similarly, comparisons of auditory responses during self-produced speech and while listening to recordings of one’s own speech indicate attenuation of auditory cortex responses during speech production (Curio, Neuloh, Numminen, Jousmaki, & Hari, 2000; Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005;…”
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01260-0 · Cited by 2,858 · cited 2×
“1 Performance of these motor programs relies on contributions from bilateral premotor, motor, and subcortical regions (see below), areas that are active bilaterally during normal speech production.”
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685 · cited 5×
“This mapping from desired sensory outcome to the appropriate motor action is an inverse kinematic transformation and is often referred to as an inverse model (e.g., Kawato, 1999; Wolpert & Kawato, 1998).”
InfluentialCortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683 · cited 1×
“Evidence of mirror neurons in humans has implicated left precentral gyrus for grasping actions (Tai, Scherfler, Brooks, Sawamoto, & Castiello, 2004), and left opercular inferior frontal gyrus for finger movements (Iacoboni et al., 1999).”
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93872-U · DOI
- Bays P. M., 2006, Public Library of Science Biology, 4, e28
- Bohland J. W., Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghosh S. S., 2003, Neuroimage, 19, S57
- Lehiste I., 1970, Suprasegmentals
- Maeda S., 1990, Speech production and speech modeling
- McNeil M. R., 2007, Apraxia of speech: Definition and differential diagnosis
- Robin , D. A. , Guenther , F. H. , Narayana , S. , Jacks , A. , Tourville , J. A. , Ramage , A. E. , et al. 2008 . A transcranial magnetic stimulation virtual lesion study of speech . Proceedings of the Conference on Motor Speech, Monterey, California .
- Shriberg L. D., 1982, Clinical phonetics
- Terband , H. , Maassen , B. , Brumberg , J. & Guenther , F. H. 2008 . A transcranial magnetic stimulation virtual lesion study of speech . Proceedings of the Conference on Motor Speech, Monterey, California .
- Wambaugh J. L., 2006, Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology, 14, Xxxv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r)
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021) · Second Language Speech Learning · doi:10.1017/9781108886901.002 · Cited by 429
Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 581
The Cortical Organization of Syntax
Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz180 · Cited by 370
Fridriksson, J., den Ouden, D., Hillis, A. E., Hickok, G. S., Rorden, C., Basilakos, A., Yourganov, G., & Bonilha, L. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx363 · Cited by 404
“…of how speech and language are rooted in the brain as extensive research has shown how many other cortical and subcortical regions besides Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas are involved in processing speech and language (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Ueno et al., 2011).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Tourville, J. A., & Guenther, F. H.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guenther, Frank H.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 952-981
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- PMC
- PMC3650855
- OpenAlex
- W2011934537
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 178
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Language and Cognitive Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002852)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- DIVA model, speech production, speech development, ventral premotor cortex, right lateralization, feedback control, brain regions, computational model, communication disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
