The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 178 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The DIVA model: A neural theory of speech acquisition and production
Open accessAbstract
The DIVA model of speech production provides a computationally and neuroanatomically explicit account of the network of brain regions involved in speech acquisition and production. An overview of the model is provided along with descriptions of the computations performed in the different brain regions represented in the model. The latest version of the model, which contains a new right-lateralised feedback control map in ventral premotor cortex, will be described, and experimental results that motivated this new model component will be discussed. Application of the model to the study and treatment of communication disorders will also be briefly described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These results suggest that inner speech production is associated with a time-locked and content-specific internal forward model, similar to the one that operates in the production of overt speech.”
From Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech (2017) · cites this paper as Tourville and Guenther, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The lack of convergence in L-IFG is of interest as it is invariably a part of the corollary discharge network according to computational and neuroanatomical models of speech production (Chen et al., 2011; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
From Bridging phenomenology and neural mechanisms of inner speech: ALE meta-analysis on egocentricity and spontaneity in a dual-mechanistic framework (2023) · cites this paper as Tourville & Guenther, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., & Oeltermann, A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35084005 · Cited by 6,551
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295 · cited 2×
“Similarly, comparisons of auditory responses during self-produced speech and while listening to recordings of one’s own speech indicate attenuation of auditory cortex responses during speech production (Curio, Neuloh, Numminen, Jousmaki, & Hari, 2000; Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005;…”
Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 · Cited by 4,870 · cited 1×
“1 Performance of these motor programs relies on contributions from bilateral premotor, motor, and subcortical regions (see below), areas that are active bilaterally during normal speech production.”
Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.
Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Chesler, D. A., Goldberg, I. E., Weisskoff, R. M., Poncelet, B. P., Kennedy, D. N., Hoppel, B. E., Cohen, M. S., & Turner, R. (1992) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5675 · Cited by 4,212 · cited 2×
“Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Belliveau et al., 1992; Kwong et al., 1992; Ogawa et al.,”
Editorial Office (1997) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1381/096089297765555359 · Cited by 3,941
Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study
di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00230027 · Cited by 3,539
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 2×
“Similarly, comparisons of auditory responses during self-produced speech and while listening to recordings of one’s own speech indicate attenuation of auditory cortex responses during speech production (Curio, Neuloh, Numminen, Jousmaki, & Hari, 2000; Heinks-Maldonado, Mathalon, Gray, & Ford, 2005;…”
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01260-0 · Cited by 2,858 · cited 2×
“1 Performance of these motor programs relies on contributions from bilateral premotor, motor, and subcortical regions (see below), areas that are active bilaterally during normal speech production.”
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685 · cited 5×
“This mapping from desired sensory outcome to the appropriate motor action is an inverse kinematic transformation and is often referred to as an inverse model (e.g., Kawato, 1999; Wolpert & Kawato, 1998).”
InfluentialCortical mechanisms of human imitation
Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Brass, M., Bekkering, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2526 · Cited by 2,683 · cited 1×
“Evidence of mirror neurons in humans has implicated left precentral gyrus for grasping actions (Tai, Scherfler, Brooks, Sawamoto, & Castiello, 2004), and left opercular inferior frontal gyrus for finger movements (Iacoboni et al., 1999).”
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93872-U · DOI
- Bays P. M., 2006, Public Library of Science Biology, 4, e28
- Bohland J. W., Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 · DOI · Paper page
- Ghosh S. S., 2003, Neuroimage, 19, S57
- Lehiste I., 1970, Suprasegmentals
- Maeda S., 1990, Speech production and speech modeling
- McNeil M. R., 2007, Apraxia of speech: Definition and differential diagnosis
- Robin , D. A. , Guenther , F. H. , Narayana , S. , Jacks , A. , Tourville , J. A. , Ramage , A. E. , et al. 2008 . A transcranial magnetic stimulation virtual lesion study of speech . Proceedings of the Conference on Motor Speech, Monterey, California .
- Shriberg L. D., 1982, Clinical phonetics
- Terband , H. , Maassen , B. , Brumberg , J. & Guenther , F. H. 2008 . A transcranial magnetic stimulation virtual lesion study of speech . Proceedings of the Conference on Motor Speech, Monterey, California .
- Wambaugh J. L., 2006, Journal of Medical Speech–Language Pathology, 14, Xxxv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r)
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O.-S. (2021) · Second Language Speech Learning · doi:10.1017/9781108886901.002 · Cited by 429
Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 581
The Cortical Organization of Syntax
Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz180 · Cited by 370
Fridriksson, J., den Ouden, D., Hillis, A. E., Hickok, G. S., Rorden, C., Basilakos, A., Yourganov, G., & Bonilha, L. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx363 · Cited by 404
“…of how speech and language are rooted in the brain as extensive research has shown how many other cortical and subcortical regions besides Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas are involved in processing speech and language (Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Ueno et al., 2011).”
BackgroundThe role of the supplementary motor area for speech and language processing
Hertrich, I., Dietrich, S., & Ackermann, H. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.030 · Cited by 315
The Neurocognition of Developmental Disorders of Language
Ullman, M. T., Earle, F. S., Walenski, M., & Janacsek, K. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011555 · Cited by 223
Baayen, R. H., Chuang, Y., Shafaei-Bajestan, E., & Blevins, J. P. (2019) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2019/4895891 · Cited by 202
“As some models of speech production assemble articulatory targets from phone segments (e.g., Tourville and Guenther, 2011), the present implementation can be seen as a front-end for this type of model.”
Voice Modulation: A Window into the Origins of Human Vocal Control?
Pisanski, K., Cartei, V., McGettigan, C., Raine, J., & Reby, D. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.002 · Cited by 189
“, [65]).”
Cognitive Phonetics: The Transduction of Distinctive Features at the Phonology-Phonetics Interface
Volenec, V., & Reiss, C. (2018) · Biolinguistics · doi:10.5964/bioling.9089 · Cited by 171
Prosodic and phonetic subtypes of primary progressive apraxia of speech
Utianski, R. L., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., Strand, E. A., Botha, H., Schwarz, C. G., Machulda, M. M., Senjem, M. L., Spychalla, A. J., Jack, C. R., et al. (2018) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.004 · Cited by 168
fMRI investigation of unexpected somatosensory feedback perturbation during speech
Golfinopoulos, E., Tourville, J. A., Bohland, J. W., Ghosh, S., Nieto-Castañón, A., & Guenther, F. H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.065 · Cited by 152
“This interpretation is reflected in the most recent version of the DIVA model (e.g., Golfinopoulos et al., 2010; Tourville and Guenther, 2010).”
InfluentialSelf-citationBuz, E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.12.009 · Cited by 150
“…to forward models underlying articulation (as proposed in Jaeger & Ferreira, 2013; for specific models, see Hickok, 2012; Houde & Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville & Guenther, 2011) or selection between different forward models (similar to recent proposals for speech perception, Kleinschmidt &…”
BackgroundThe Role of Rhythm in Speech and Language Rehabilitation: The SEP Hypothesis
Fujii, S., & Wan, C. Y. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00777 · Cited by 158
“(Guenther et al., 2006; Tourville and Guenther, 2011) (see red arrow in Figure 2C ).”
InfluentialPickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108610728 · Cited by 163
Herff, C., Diener, L., Angrick, M., Mugler, E., Tate, M. C., Goldrick, M. A., Krusienski, D. J., Slutzky, M. W., & Schultz, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.01267 · Cited by 118
“The speech production process has been widely studied (Tian and Poeppel, 2010; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Hickok, 2012), and while it is not fully understood, a number of brain areas are known to be involved at the level of producing articulation.”
Parrell, B., Agnew, Z. K., Nagarajan, S. S., Houde, J. F., & Ivry, R. B. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3363-16.2017 · Cited by 132
“Although the cerebellum appears in some models of feedback control in speech (Tourville and Guenther, 2011), our results are in accord with past work in other motor domains, where patients with cerebellar pathology were found to retain the ability to use sensory feedback to correct ongoing…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBeal, D. S., Gracco, V. L., Brettschneider, J., Kroll, R. M., & Nil, L. F. D. (2012) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.013 · Cited by 142
“Other brain regions, such as the pars opercularis, that are known to be active during both speech perception and production have been proposed to play a key role in speech acquisition (Guenther and Vladusich, 2012; Hickok, 2009; Lotto et al., 2009).”
BackgroundRetraining speech production and fluency in non-fluent/agrammatic primary progressive aphasia
Henry, M. L., Hubbard, H. I., Grasso, S. M., Mandelli, M. L., Wilson, S. M., Sathishkumar, M. T., Fridriksson, J., Daigle, W., Boxer, A. L., Miller, B. L., et al. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy101 · Cited by 127
Gauvin, H. S., Baene, W. D., Braß, M., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.037 · Cited by 124
“…during feedback processing have also been related to error detection in perception-based models, as it is hypothesized to drive corrective motor commands to the motor cortex after receiving input from somatosensory and auditory areas (Ito, 2008; Tourville & Guenther, 2011; Hickok, 2012).”
The FACTS model of speech motor control: Fusing state estimation and task-based control
Parrell, B., Ramanarayanan, V., Nagarajan, S. S., & Houde, J. F. (2019) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007321 · Cited by 119
Angrick, M., Ottenhoff, M. C., Diener, L., Ivucic, D., Ivucic, G., Goulis, S., Saal, J., Colon, A. J., Wagner, L., Krusienski, D. J., et al. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02578-0 · Cited by 125
Decoding spoken English from intracortical electrode arrays in dorsal precentral gyrus
Wilson, G. H., Stavisky, S. D., Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Kelemen, J. N., Hochberg, L. R., Henderson, J. M., Druckmann, S., & Shenoy, K. V. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abbfef · Cited by 103
Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Persisting Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Preston, J. L., Brick, N., & Landi, N. (2013) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0139 · Cited by 115
Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production
Parkinson, A. L., Flagmeier, S. G., Manes, J. L., Larson, C. R., Rogers, B., & Robin, D. A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.068 · Cited by 110
“The DIVA model of speech production (Guenther, et al., 2006; Guenther et al., 1998; Tourville and Guenther, 2011) is another model that incorporates auditory feedback and feed-forward commands for voice and speech control (Guenther, et al.”
BackgroundMethodNeurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech
Whitford, T. J., Jack, B. N., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., Luque, D., Harris, A. W., Spencer, K. M., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.28197 · Cited by 106
The use of content and timing to predict turn transitions
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00751 · Cited by 120
“Theories of speech production make such claims about syllables and phonemes (Hickok et al., 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundCortical Activity Predicts Which Older Adults Recognize Speech in Noise and When
Vaden, K. I., Kuchinsky, S. E., Ahlstrom, J. B., Dubno, J. R., & Eckert, M. A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2908-14.2015 · Cited by 110
“Importantly, our word recognition in noise task involved speech production to assess recognition, which means that cingulo-opercular activity could reflect the engagement of hypothesized speech control mechanisms (Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Hickok, 2012).”
BackgroundOn the cortical dynamics of word production: a review of the MEG evidence
Munding, D., Dubarry, A., & Alario, F. ‐. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1071857 · Cited by 108
“As an example of a more interactive model, we considered the hierarchical state feedback control (HSFC) model proposed by Hickok (2012; see also Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodSpeech Sound Disorders in Children: An Articulatory Phonology Perspective
Namasivayam, A. K., Coleman, D., O’Dwyer, A., & Lieshout, P. H. H. M. V. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02998 · Cited by 124
Friston, K. J., Sajid, N., Quiroga‐Martinez, D. R., Parr, T., Price, C. J., & Holmes, E. (2020) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2020.107998 · Cited by 113
Auditory‐motor adaptation is reduced in adults who stutter but not in children who stutter
Daliri, A., Wieland, E. A., Cai, S., Guenther, F. H., & Chang, S. (2017) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/desc.12521 · Cited by 98
“…suggestions that after the acquisition of speech around age of three, the role of auditory feedback may gradually start to change in comparison to its role during speech acquisition (Callan, Kent, Guenther, & Vorperian, 2000; Guenther, 2006; Kuhl, 1994; Kuhl, 2004; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundSelf-citationTurkeltaub, P. E., Swears, M. K., D’Mello, A. M., & Stoodley, C. J. (2016) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-150633 · Cited by 85
“Modulation of these language-motor interactions may be especially useful for people with nonfluent aphasias and apraxia of speech, consistent with the proposed role of the cerebellum in both feed-forward and feedback control of speech acquisition and production (Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
Role of the auditory system in speech production
Guenther, F. H., & Hickok, G. S. (2015) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-62630-1.00009-3 · Cited by 92
Self-citationPoole, M. L., Brodtmann, A., Darby, D., & Vogel, A. P. (2017) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-s-16-0140 · Cited by 84
“…of atypical speech in participants with nfvPPA correlated with regions typically associated with motor speech planning and execution (Guenther, 2006; Tourville & Guenther, 2011), namely the left middle and inferior frontal gyrus, cingulate, premotor area, and insula (Grossman et al., 2013;…”
BackgroundChow, H. M., & Chang, S. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23590 · Cited by 86
“According to an influential neuro-computational model of speech, three interactive components are critical for fluent speech production [Civier et al., 2013; Tourville and Guenther, 2011].”
BackgroundFloegel, M., Fuchs, S. I., & Kell, C. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16743-2 · Cited by 86
Jenson, D. E., Bowers, A. L., Harkrider, A. W., Thornton, D. M., Cuellar, M. E., & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00656 · Cited by 91
“Sensorimotor integration (SMI) provides an interface for speech perception and production and is fundamental to efficient verbal communication (e.g., Perrier et al., 1996; Rogalsky et al., 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Guenther and Vladusich, 2012; Moulin-Frier and Arbib, 2013).”
BackgroundA hierarchical model for interpersonal verbal communication
Jiang, J., Zheng, L., & Lu, C. (2020) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa151 · Cited by 92
“the DIVA model (Tourville and Guenther, 2011) and the WEAVER++ model (Levelt et al.”
MethodThe Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon
Anna Papafragou, A., Trueswell, J. C., & Gleitman, L. R. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.001.0001 · Cited by 82
Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning
Parrell, B., & Houde, J. (2019) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0127 · Cited by 75
“In speech, this combined feedforward/feedback architecture is used in the DIVA model (Guenther, 2016; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
MethodEmmorey, K. D., McCullough, S., Mehta, S. H., & Grabowski, T. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00484 · Cited by 80
“The activation peak in the right middle frontal gyrus (+52, +16, +38) for speaking (>signing) is near the coordinates for the right lateralized feedback control component for speech production proposed by the DIVA model (Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodCurrent models of speech motor control: A control-theoretic overview of architectures and properties
Parrell, B., Lammert, A. C., Ciccarelli, G. A., & Quatieri, T. F. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5092807 · Cited by 88
“The plant in DIVA has historically been Maeda’s model (Tourville and Guenther, 2011), but several models of the plant have been used throughout DIVA’s development [e.g., Callan et al. (2000)], and most recently a custom plant model has been used (Guenther, 2016).”
MethodElectrophysiological Evidence for Top-Down Lexical Influences on Early Speech Perception
Getz, L. M., & Toscano, J. C. (2019) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619841813 · Cited by 72
“Nonetheless, it is plausible that the speech-production system could produce such effects, given the tight coupling between production and perception (Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundNew Developments in Understanding the Complexity of Human Speech Production
Simonyan, K., Ackermann, H., Chang, E. F., & Greenlee, J. D. W. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2424-16.2016 · Cited by 73
“Data from Bouchard et al. (2013). tion, semantic processing, memory encoding, preparation, and execution of vocal motor commands (e.g., Hickok and Poeppel, 2007; Houde and Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Price, 2012).”
BackgroundThe Application of EEG Mu Rhythm Measures to Neurophysiological Research in Stuttering
Jenson, D. E., Bowers, A. L., Hudock, D., & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00458 · Cited by 66
“…notions that PWS are overly reliant on sensory feedback (Max et al., 2004) and reports that corrective feedback signals are mediated by the right hemisphere (Tourville and Guenther, 2011), these findings suggest a proportionally larger contribution of reafference to speech motor control in PWS.”
BackgroundRhythm in speech and animal vocalizations: a cross‐species perspective
Ravignani, A., Bella, S. D., Falk, S., Kello, C. T., Noriega, F., & Kotz, S. A. (2019) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14166 · Cited by 74
A Role for the Frontal Aslant Tract in Speech Planning: A Neurosurgical Case Study
Chernoff, B. L., Teghipco, A., Garcea, F. E., Sims, M. H., Paul, D. A., Tivarus, M. E., Smith, S. O., Pilcher, W. H., & Mahon, B. Z. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01244 · Cited by 62
Conversational Interaction in the Scanner: Mentalizing during Language Processing as Revealed by MEG
Bögels, S., Barr, D. J., Garrod, S., & Kessler, K. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu116 · Cited by 60
“6), supporting the notion of top-down suppression of a “wrong” linguistic prediction after the same speaker used a term that mismatched with the expected precedent.”
BackgroundGastaldon, S., Arcara, G., Navarrete, E., & Peressotti, F. (2020) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2020.09.026 · Cited by 60
Ozker, M., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., & Flinker, A. (2022) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001493 · Cited by 59
Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech in Children and Adults: A Scoping Review
Allison, K. M., Cordella, C., Iuzzini-Seigel, J., & Green, J. R. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00061 · Cited by 66
“The Directions Into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA) is one such example of neuroanatomically specific computational account of speech production (Guenther, 2016; Guenther et al., 2006; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundTriggering prepared actions by sudden sounds: reassessing the evidence for a single mechanism
Marinovic, W., & Tresilian, J. R. (2015) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12627 · Cited by 57
“…– usually called burst generators (Scudder et al. 2002) – have been the inspiration for models of the command generating processes for skills like reaching, grasping and speaking (Bullock & Grossberg 1988, Guenther 1995, Bullock et al. 1998, Shadmehr & Wise 2005, Tourville & Guenther 2011).”
BackgroundSpeaking-Induced Suppression of the Auditory Cortex in Humans and Its Relevance to Schizophrenia
Whitford, T. J. (2019) · Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.011 · Cited by 64
Developmental stuttering and the role of the supplementary motor cortex
Busan, P. (2020) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2020.105763 · Cited by 52
A neuronal retuning hypothesis of sentence-specificity in Broca’s area
Matchin, W. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1377-6 · Cited by 55
Human Sensorimotor Cortex Control of Directly Measured Vocal Tract Movements during Vowel Production
Conant, D. F., Bouchard, K. E., Leonard, M. K., & Chang, E. F. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2382-17.2018 · Cited by 56
Imitating Sounds: A Cognitive Approach to Understanding Vocal Imitation
Mercado, E., Mantell, J. T., & Pfordresher, P. Q. (2014) · Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews · doi:10.3819/ccbr.2014.90002 · Cited by 55
Dataset of Speech Production in intracranial Electroencephalography
Verwoert, M., Ottenhoff, M. C., Goulis, S., Colon, A., Wagner, L., Tousseyn, S., van Dijk, J. P., Kubben, P., & Herff, C. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01542-9 · Cited by 56
Auditory representation of learned sound sequences in motor regions of the macaque brain
Archakov, D., DeWitt, I., Kuśmierek, P., Ortiz-Rios, M., Cameron, D. J., Cui, D., Morin, E. L., VanMeter, J. W., Sams, M. E., Jääskeläinen, I. P., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1915610117 · Cited by 53
Rapid learning of a phonemic discrimination in the first hours of life
Wu, Y. J., Hou, X., Peng, C., Yu, W., Oppenheim, G. M., Thierry, G., & Zhang, D. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-022-01355-1 · Cited by 57
Matchin, W., Groulx, K., & Hickok, G. S. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00515 · Cited by 50
“Existing models of speech motor control provide a mechanism for such an association in the form of feedback control architectures (Hickok, 2012; Hickok, Houde, & Rong, 2011; Houde & Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
Sitek, K. R., Cai, S., Beal, D. S., Perkell, J. S., Guenther, F. H., & Ghosh, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00190 · Cited by 52
“…monitoring of speech output (Allen et al., 1997; Craig-McQuaide et al., 2014), which aligns with the repeated finding of hyperactive cerebellum in stuttering (Brown et al., 2005) and with the DIVA model of speech production (Guenther et al., 2006; Civier et al., 2010; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationQuantification of motor speech impairment and its anatomic basis in primary progressive aphasia
Cordella, C., Quimby, M., Touroutoglou, A., Brickhouse, M., Dickerson, B. C., & Green, J. R. (2019) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000007367 · Cited by 49
Manes, J. L., Tjaden, K., Parrish, T. B., Simuni, T., Roberts, A., Greenlee, J. D. W., Corcos, D. M., & Kurani, A. S. (2018) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1073 · Cited by 51
Kristinsson, S., Basilakos, A., den Ouden, D., Cassarly, C. N., Spell, L. A., Bonilha, L., Rorden, C., Hillis, A. E., Hickok, G. S., Johnson, L., et al. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00347 · Cited by 56
A seat at the (language) table: incorporating the cerebellum into frameworks for language processing
LeBel, A., & D’Mello, A. M. (2023) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2023.101310 · Cited by 47
Dissecting the functional anatomy of auditory word repetition
Hope, T. M. H., Prejawa, S., Jones, Ō. P., Oberhuber, M., Seghier, M. L., Green, D. W., & Price, C. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00246 · Cited by 46
“Output phonology supports speech production when prior knowledge of speech sounds drives and monitors Frontiers in Human Neuroscience www.frontiersin.org May 2014 | Volume 8 | Article 246 | 1 HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE articulatory activity (Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Guenther and Vladusich, 2012).”
BackgroundPerception-production relations in later development of American English rhotics
Byun, T. M., & Tiede, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0172022 · Cited by 46
Li, W., Zhuang, J., Guo, Z., Jones, J. A., Xu, Z., & Liu, H. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24734 · Cited by 46
“In the DIVA model (Tourville & Guenther, 2011), the cerebellum is hypothesized to use feedback signals from auditory and somatosensory areas for feedforward control of speech production.”
BackgroundMethodNeural Models of Motor Speech Control
Guenther, F. H., & Hickok, G. S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00058-4 · Cited by 58
Self-citationAtypical Caudate Anatomy in Children Who Stutter
Foundas, A. L., Cindass, R., Mock, J. R., & Corey, D. M. (2013) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/15.10.pms.116.2.528-543 · Cited by 45
“Previous studies have shown that some adults who stutter may have a defect at the level of the auditory temporal cortex (Foundas, et al., 2004) that could infl uence the shift to a left-lateralized feedforward and a rightlateralized feedback control mechanism (Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundFoundas, A. L., Mock, J. R., Corey, D. M., Golob, E. J., & Conture, E. G. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.004 · Cited by 45
Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect
Stevenson, A. J. T., Chiu, C., Maslovat, D., Chua, R., Gick, B., Blouin, J.-S., & Franks, I. M. (2014) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.041 · Cited by 48
“Speech execution has long been argued to be mediated by cortical connections (e.g., Jurgens, 2002; Simonyan and Horwitz, 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011), with fMRI studies confirming activation during speech production in such areas as the anterior cingulate gyrus, motor cortex, and…”
Callan, D. E., Jones, J. A., & Callan, A. M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00389 · Cited by 44
“It is rather uncontroversial that during the development of speech production, auditory-articulatory and orosensoryarticulatory relationships must be established and encoded into internal models (Callan et al., 2000b; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Guenther and Vladusich, 2012).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBourguignon, N. J. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.008 · Cited by 47
Self-, other-, and joint monitoring using forward models
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00132 · Cited by 45
The Gesture as an Autonomous Nonlinear Dynamical System
Sorensen, T., & Gafos, A. I. (2016) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1080/10407413.2016.1230368 · Cited by 44
“See Houde and Nagarajan (2011) and Tourville and Guenther (2011) for speech and Todorov (2005) and Shadmehr andMussa-Ivaldi (2012) for general treatments of this interplay.”
Individual variability as a window on production-perception interactions in speech motor control
Franken, M. K., Acheson, D. J., McQueen, J. M., Eisner, F., & Peter Hagoort, A. (2017) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5006899 · Cited by 44
“Several current theories of speech motor control hypothesize that speech perception contributes to speech production through an auditory feedback mechanism that informs speech motor control (Hickok et al., 2011; Houde and Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodDisrupted functional connectivity in primary progressive apraxia of speech
Botha, H., Utianski, R. L., Whitwell, J. L., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., Strand, E. A., Machulda, M. M., Tosakulwong, N., Knopman, D. S., Petersen, R. C., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.02.036 · Cited by 49
“…of the areas included within these networks also feature prominently in existing models of speech production, such as the primary motor cortex, ventral premotor cortex, supplementary motor area, supramarginal gyrus, deep gray nuclei, and cerebellum in the DIVA model (Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
EEG mu rhythms: Rich sources of sensorimotor information in speech processing
Saltuklaroglu, T., Bowers, A. L., Harkrider, A. W., Casenhiser, D. M., Reilly, K. J., Jenson, D. E., & Thornton, D. M. (2018) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2018.09.005 · Cited by 47
Houde, J. F., Gill, J. S., Agnew, Z. K., Kothare, H., Hickok, G. S., Parrell, B., Ivry, R. B., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5100910 · Cited by 41
“As mentioned earlier, current models of speech motor control emphasize that speech production relies on a combination of feedback and feedforward control (Houde and Nagarajan, 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundLimited Pre-Speech Auditory Modulation in Individuals Who Stutter: Data and Hypotheses
Max, L., & Daliri, A. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0358 · Cited by 51
“…or sequence of speech sounds, it accurately predicts the auditory consequences of the planned movements, and it uses this prediction to inform the auditory cortex about expected feedback input (E. F. Chang et al., 2013; Houde & Nagarajan, 2011; Niziolek et al., 2013; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
MethodNew Perspectives on the Neurobiology of Sign Languages
Emmorey, K. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2021.748430 · Cited by 57
“…of speech production consistently report bilateral STC activation, due at least in part to the auditory feedback that accompanies speech, and some models propose that auditory targets for production are represented in middle and posterior STC (e.g., the DIVA model; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodJenson, D. E., Harkrider, A. W., Thornton, D. M., Bowers, A. L., & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00534 · Cited by 46
“According to contemporary models of speech such as the Directions into Velocities of Articulators (DIVA; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Guenther and Vladusich, 2012) and State Feedback Control (SFC; Hickok et al.”
MethodResultInfluentialImpaired auditory discrimination and auditory-motor integration in hyperfunctional voice disorders
Abur, D., Subaciute, A., Kapsner-Smith, M. R., Segina, R. K., Tracy, L. F., Noordzij, J. P., & Stepp, C. E. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-92250-8 · Cited by 42
Partially Overlapping Brain Networks for Singing and Cello Playing
Segado, M., Hollinger, A. D., Thibodeau, J., Penhune, V. B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00351 · Cited by 42
“Current models of auditory-motor integration for music and speech comprise a feed-forward and a feed-back component (Brown et al., 2004; Zatorre et al., 2007; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Kleber and Zarate, 2014).”
BackgroundFeedback and Feedforward Auditory-Motor Processes for Voice and Articulation in Parkinson's Disease
Abur, D., Subaciute, A., Daliri, A., Lester‐Smith, R. A., Lupiani, A. A., Cilento, D., Enos, N. M., Weerathunge, H. R., Tardif, M. C., & Stepp, C. E. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00153 · Cited by 44
Ylinen, S., Nora, A., Leminen, A., Hakala, T., Huotilainen, M., Shtyrov, Y., Mäkelä, J. P., & Service, E. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht351 · Cited by 42
Sensorimotor integration on a rapid time scale
Luo, J., Kothari, N. B., & Moss, C. F. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1702671114 · Cited by 40
Robust Sensorimotor Learning during Variable Sentence-Level Speech
Lametti, D. R., Smith, H. J., Watkins, K. E., & Shiller, D. M. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.030 · Cited by 41
Civier, O., Kronfeld-Duenias, V., Amir, O., Ezrati-Vinacour, R., & Ben‐Shachar, M. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.012 · Cited by 45
“Thus, although this alternative feedback-based speech production network is initially recruited to alleviate stuttering (Tourville & Guenther, 2011; Tourville et al., 2008), it turns out to be inadequate, and ends up worsening symptoms (Civier et al., 2010).”
BackgroundCortico-cerebellar Networks Drive Sensorimotor Learning in Speech
Lametti, D. R., Smith, H. J., Freidin, P. F., & Watkins, K. E. (2017) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01216 · Cited by 42
Language processing from the perspective of electrical stimulation mapping
Rofes, A., Mandonnet, E., de Aguiar, V., Rapp, B. C., Tsapkini, K., & Miceli, G. (2018) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2018.1485636 · Cited by 38
Sound Production Treatment: Synthesis and Quantification of Outcomes.
Bailey, D. J., Eatchel, K., & Wambaugh, J. (2015) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2015_ajslp-14-0127 · Cited by 31
Jenson, D., Reilly, K. J., Harkrider, A. W., Thornton, D. M., & Saltuklaroglu, T. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.05.026 · Cited by 38
“It is commonly recorded over anterior dorsal stream regions (Tamura et al., 2012; Jenson et al., 2014), including the premotor cortex, which serves as a computational hub for processing sensorimotor information (Hickok et al., 2011; Tourville and Guenther, 2011; Guenther and Vladusich, 2012).”
Speech Production From a Developmental Perspective
Redford, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0130 · Cited by 43
“…theories of implementation (e.g., Guenther, 1995; Guenther & Perkell, 2004; Keating & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2002; Turk & Shattuck-Hufnagel, 2014), and by prediction-based models of speech motor control (e.g., Hickok, 2012; Houde & Nagarajan, 2011; Niziolek et al., 2013; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
MethodInfluentialThe Same Ultra-Rapid Parallel Brain Dynamics Underpin the Production and Perception of Speech
Fairs, A., Michelas, A., Dufour, S., & Strijkers, K. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex Communications · doi:10.1093/texcom/tgab040 · Cited by 40
Mapping articulatory and grammatical subcomponents of fluency deficits in post-stroke aphasia
Mirman, D., Kraft, A. E., Harvey, D. Y., Brecher, A. R., & Schwartz, M. F. (2019) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-019-00729-9 · Cited by 37
Iuzzini-Seigel, J. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00581 · Cited by 37
“In a TD talker, sensory-motor neural traces are posited to strengthen over repeated productions as the child maps his/ her productions onto corresponding adult forms (Guenther, 2006; Tourville & Guenther, 2011).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Tourville, J. A., & Guenther, F. H.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Guenther, Frank H.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 952-981
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- PMC
- PMC3650855
- OpenAlex
- W2011934537
- Cited by
- 748
- References
- 178
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Language and Cognitive Processes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002852)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- DIVA model, speech production, speech development, ventral premotor cortex, right lateralization, feedback control, brain regions, computational model, communication disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
