The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling Parsing Constraints with High-dimensional Context Space
Abstract
Deriving representations of meaning has been a long-standing problem in cognitive psychology and psycholinguistics. The lack of a m odel for representing semantic and grammatical knowledge has been a handicap in attempting to model the effects of semantic constraints in hum an syntactic processing. A computational model of high-dim ensional context space, the Hyperspace A nalogue to Language (H AL), is presented with a series of simulations modelling a variety of human empirical results. HAL learns its representations from the unsupervised processing of 300 million words of conversational text. W e propose that HAL's high-dim ensional context space can be used to (1) provide a basic categorisation of semantic and grammatical concepts, (2) model certain aspects of morphological ambiguity in verbs, and (3) provide an account of semantic context effects in syntactic processing. W e propose that the distributed and contextually derived representations that HAL acquires provide a basis for the subconceptual knowledge that can be used in accounting for a diverse set of cognitive phenomena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis
Fodor, J. A., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1988) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5 · Cited by 4,022
Lesioning an attractor network: Investigations of acquired dyslexia.
Hinton, G. E., & Shallice, T. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.98.1.74 · Cited by 655
Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C. (1994) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969408402115 · Cited by 379
Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence comprehension
St. John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/0004-3702(90)90008-n · Cited by 322
Cited by
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002149 · Cited by 6,887
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196313 · Cited by 2,361
Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.111.1.205 · Cited by 948
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005) · Grounding Cognition · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511499968.007 · Cited by 752
Perceptions of perceptual symbols
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99532147 · Cited by 620
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, C. B. A. K.
- Venue
- Language and Cognitive Processes
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 177-210
- ISSN
- 0169-0965 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0732
- OpenAlex
- W2114044559
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling Parsing Constraints with High-dimensional Context Space. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/016909697386844
- The paper
- Lund, C. B. A. K. (1997). Modelling Parsing Constraints with High-dimensional Context Space. Language and Cognitive Processes. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909697386844
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.