Cited by 50Robot Manipulation and LearningProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

A framework for robotic clothing assistance by imitation learning

Joshi, R. P., Koganti, N., Shibata, T.·2019·Advanced Robotics

Abstract

The recent demographic trend across developed nations shows a dramatic increase in the aging population, fallen fertility rates and a shortage of caregivers. Hence, the demand for service robots to assist with dressing which is an essential Activity of Daily Living (ADL) is increasing rapidly. Robotic Clothing Assistance is a challenging task since the robot has to deal with two demanding tasks simultaneously, (a) non-rigid and highly flexible cloth manipulation and (b) safe human–robot interaction while assisting humans whose posture may vary during the task. On the other hand, humans can deal with these tasks rather easily. In this paper, we propose a framework for robotic clothing assistance by imitation learning from a human demonstration to a compliant dual-arm robot. In this framework, we divide the dressing task into three phases, i.e. reaching phase, arm dressing phase, and body dressing phase. We model the arm dressing phase as a global trajectory modification using Dynamic Movement Primitives (DMP), while we model the body dressing phase toward a local trajectory modification applying Bayesian Gaussian Process Latent Variable Model (BGPLVM). We show that the proposed framework developed towards assisting the elderly is generalizable to various people and successfully performs a sleeveless shirt dressing task. We also present participants feedback on public demonstration at the International Robot Exhibition (iREX) 2017. To our knowledge, this is the first work performing a full dressing of a sleeveless shirt on a human subject with a humanoid robot.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01691864.2019.1636715

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joshi, R. P., Koganti, N., & Shibata, T.
Affiliations
  • Kyushu Institute of Technology (JP)
  • Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
Corresponding author
Shibata, T.
Venue
Advanced Robotics
Published
2019-07-09
Volume
33
Issue
22
Pages
1156-1174
ISSN
  • 0169-1864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5535
OpenAlex
W2961077157
Cited by
50
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advanced Robotics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H01749)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
dressing assistance, imitation learning, dual-arm robot, dynamic movement primitives, human-robot interaction, fabric manipulation, activities of daily living, elderly care, service robots, trajectory modification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review