The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data
Abstract
Case studies demonstrate that e-government is an effective tool to reduce corruption by promoting good governance and strengthening reform-oriented actors. Specifically, e-government can reduce corrupt behaviors externally by enhancing relationships with citizens and internally by more effectively controlling and monitoring employees' behaviors. This study examines the impact of e-government on corruption using national level data. The impacts of other traditional factors—bureaucratic professionalism, bureaucratic quality, and law enforcement—proposed by the public administration literature are also examined. Statistical analysis reveals that e-government has a consistently positive impact on reducing corruption, as do the traditional anti-corruption factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-3570 · Cited by 2,372
Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175098 · Cited by 2,172
Michalos, A. C., & Poff, D. C. (2018) · Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_260-2 · Cited by 1,946
Bureaucratic Structure and Personality
Merton, R. K. (1940) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2570634 · Cited by 1,357
Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative
Ho, A. T. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00197 · Cited by 1,171
E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges
Ndou, V. (. (2004) · THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES · doi:10.1002/j.1681-4835.2004.tb00117.x · Cited by 1,094
Wealth, Culture, and Corruption
Husted, B. W. (1999) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490073 · Cited by 853
Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective
Unpan (2002) · Cited by 473
WHAT DETERMINES CORRUPTION? INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE FROM MICRODATA
MOCAN, N. (2008) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00107.x · Cited by 376
Cited by
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 · Cited by 2,451
E-Government and Corruption: A Longitudinal Analysis of Countries
Zhao, X., & Xu, H. D. (2015) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.942736 · Cited by 79
Does E-Government Raise Effectiveness and Efficiency?: Examining the Cross-National Effect
Nam, T. (2019) · Journal of Global Information Management · doi:10.4018/jgim.2019070107 · Cited by 53
Automated, administrative decision‐making and good governance: Synergies, trade‐offs, and limits
Roehl, U. B. U., & Hansen, M. B. (2024) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13799 · Cited by 38
The impact of e-procurement on institutional quality
Mélon, L., & Spruk, R. (2020) · Journal of Public Procurement · doi:10.1108/jopp-07-2019-0050 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H.
- Venue
- International Journal of Public Administration
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 298-316
- ISSN
- 0190-0692 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4265
- OpenAlex
- W2162526656
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 40.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01900690701590553
- The paper
- Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-Government and Anti-Corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data. International Journal of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900690701590553
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
