The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Organ Weights for Rodent and Non-Rodent Toxicity Studies: A Review of Regulatory Guidelines and a Survey of Current Practices
Abstract
The Society of Toxicologic Pathology convened a working group to evaluate current practices regarding organ weights in toxicology studies. A survey was distributed to pharmaceutical, veterinary, chemical, food/nutritional and consumer product companies in Europe, North America, and Japan. Responses were compiled to identify organs routinely weighed for various study types in rodent and non-rodent species, compare methods of organ weighing, provide perspectives on the value of organ weights and identify the scientist(s) responsible for organ weight data interpretation. Data were evaluated as a whole as well as by industry type and geographic location. Regulatory guidance documents describing organ weighing practices are generally available, however, they differ somewhat dependent on industry type and regulatory agency. While questionnaire respondents unanimously stated that organ weights were a good screening tool to identify treatment-related effects, opinions varied as to which organ weights are most valuable. The liver, kidneys, and testes were commonly weighed and most often considered useful by most respondents. Other organs thatbreak were commonly weighed included brain, adrenal glands, ovaries, thyroid glands, uterus, heart, and spleen. Lungs, lymph nodes, and other sex organs were weighed infrequently in routine studies, but were often weighed in specialized studies such as inhalation, immunotoxicity, and reproduction studies. Organ-to-body weight ratios were commonly calculated and were considered more useful when body weights were affected. Organ to brain weight ratios were calculated by most North American companies, but rarely according to respondents representing veterinary product or European companies. Statistical analyses were generally performed by most respondents. Pathologists performed interpretation of organ weight data for the majority of the industries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STP Immunotoxicology Working Group, Haley, P., Perry, R., Ennulat, D., Frame, S., Johnson, C., Lapointe, J.-M., Nyska, A., Snyder, P. W., Walker, D., et al. (2005) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1080/01926230590934304 · Cited by 158
Self-citationA mathematical evaluation of the thymic weight parameter
Pfeiffer, C. J. (1968) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0041-008x(68)90096-3 · Cited by 46
Cited by
Society of Toxicologic Pathology Position Paper: Organ Weight Recommendations for Toxicology Studies
Sellers, R. S., Mortan, D., Michael, B., Roome, N., Johnson, J. K., Yano, B. L., Perry, R., & Schafer, K. (2007) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1080/01926230701595300 · Cited by 481
Self-citationKovtunovych, G., Eckhaus, M. A., Ghosh, M. C., Ollivierre-Wilson, H., & Rouault, T. A. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2010-03-272138 · Cited by 271
A recombinant cystatin from Ascaris lumbricoides attenuates inflammation of DSS‐induced colitis
Coronado, S., Barrios, L., Zakzuk, J., Regino, R., Ahumada, V., Franco, L., Ocampo, Y., & Caraballo, L. (2017) · Parasite Immunology · doi:10.1111/pim.12425 · Cited by 46
Colón, J. M., Torrado, A. I., Cajigas, Á., Santiago, J. M., Salgado, I. K., Arroyo, Y., & Miranda, J. D. (2016) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2015.4111 · Cited by 35
Chen, P., Chang, C., Lin, W., Nagabhushanam, K., Ho, C., & Pan, M. (2022) · Molecular Nutrition & Food Research · doi:10.1002/mnfr.202101077 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Michael, B., Yano, B., Sellers, R. S., Perry, R., Morton, D., Roome, N., Johnson, J. K., & Schafer, K.
- Venue
- Toxicologic Pathology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 742-750
- ISSN
- 0192-6233 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2164365729
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Organ Weights for Rodent and Non-Rodent Toxicity Studies: A Review of Regulatory Guidelines and a Survey of Current Practices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/01926230701595292
- The paper
- Michael, B., Yano, B., Sellers, R. S., Perry, R., Morton, D., Roome, N., Johnson, J. K., & Schafer, K. (2007). Evaluation of Organ Weights for Rodent and Non-Rodent Toxicity Studies: A Review of Regulatory Guidelines and a Survey of Current Practices. Toxicologic Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926230701595292
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.