CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198Academic integrity and plagiarismBehavioral Health and InterventionsEthics in Business and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting Academic Misconduct Intentions and Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior and Personality

Open access
Stone, Thomas H., Jawahar, I. M., Kisamore, Jennifer L.·2010·Basic and Applied Social Psychology
DOI 10.1080/01973530903539895
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The efficacy of Azjen's (1985, 1991) Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) for the prediction of cheating intentions and behaviors was examined in a sample of 241 business undergraduates. Mediated structural equation models of the TPB, with personality constructs, adjustment, and prudence, as antecedents were examined. The TPB model explained 21% of the variance in cheating intentions and 36% of cheating behavior. Results support both the TPB model and a partially mediated model in which prudence, but not adjustment, is significantly related to model components, attitudes, norms, control, and behavior but not intention to cheat. These results suggest that the TPB model may parsimoniously integrate and advance academic misconduct research. Further TPB research and practical implications are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01973530903539895

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-NC · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Aizen I., 2009, TPB bibliography
  2. 10.1207/S15324834BASP2104_4 · DOI
  3. Barringer J. M., 2005, Hesperia, 74, 211, 10.2972/hesp.74.2.211 · DOI
  4. Hogan R., 1995, Hogan Personality Inventory Manual
  5. 10.1037/0022-0663.78.3.230 · DOI
  6. Joreskog K. G., 1982, Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, and prediction, 263
  7. 2006, The ethics of American youth
  8. McCabe D. L., 2005, Promoting academic integrity in business schools
  9. Stone T. H., 2007, Proceedings of the 2007 Management Education Division of the Administrative Sciences Association of Canada

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–197 of 197

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stone, T. H., Jawahar, I. M., & Kisamore, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Oklahoma State University (US)
  • Illinois State University (US)
  • University of Oklahoma - Tulsa (US)
Corresponding author
Stone, Thomas H.
ORCID
Venue
Basic and Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2010-02-23
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
35-45
ISSN
  • 0197-3533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4834
DOI
10.1080/01973530903539895
OpenAlex
W1964988792
Cited by
198
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Basic and Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
academic misconduct, cheating, theory of planned behavior, prudence, personality, adjustment, undergraduate business students, mediation, attitudes, social norms, perceived behavioral control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review