The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education
Open accessAbstract
Mature students transitioning into their first year of higher education face many difficulties that affect their motivation, participation and success. Their feelings of being disconnected from their peers and from their institutions are among the key barriers to the successful completion of their courses. Encouraging online student engagement among mature students to establish social connection with their instructors and peers can reduce their isolation and enhance their ‘sense of belonging’. During the academic year 2020/2021, the Lifelong Learning Centre (LLC) at the University of Leeds in the UK, decided to pilot an online chat platform ‘Differ’ including a chatbot ‘Bo’ after it had seen a decline in the use of programme Facebook groups. To promote student engagement and monitor the Differ online communities, sixteen digital student mentors were recruited and trained. During the pilot, feedback was collected from students and student mentors. A mixed-methods approach was adopted to boost robustness through triangulation. Several forms of data collection methods were used: a mentimeter, an online survey, three focus group sessions and a semi-structured interview. This study sheds light on the different aspects of creating student-led online communities and provides recommendations on how to improve the uptake of students in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
Prensky, M. (2001) · On the Horizon · doi:10.1108/10748120110424816 · Cited by 11,104
Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737011003255 · Cited by 5,687
Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1989) · Biochemical Education · doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 · Cited by 4,818
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991) · Perspectives on socially shared cognition. · doi:10.1037/10096-006 · Cited by 4,555
Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. S. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143 · Cited by 2,745
Tinto, V. (1997) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.1997.11779003 · Cited by 2,202
Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfw006 · Cited by 1,992
Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences
Stebbins, R. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9781412984249 · Cited by 1,840
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Chuang H., 2003, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19, 101
- Hobert S., 2019, 40th international conference on information systems, 1, 1
- O’Keeffe P, 2013, College Student Journal, 47, 605
- Panah E., 2020, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14, 1198
- Sjöström J., 2018, International conference on information systems education and research, 1
- Studente S., 2020, International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14, 768
- UNESCO, 2021, COVID-19: Reopening and reimagining universities, survey on higher education through the UNESCO national commissions
- Van Dijk J, 2020, The digital divide
- Zakos J., 2008, CLIVE—An artificially intelligent chat robot for conversational language practice, Artificial Intelligence: Theories, models and applicationsLecture notes in computer science 5138
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–134 of 134
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Fostering Student Creativity in Kazakhstan
Narikbayeva, L., Akhmetova, A., Шиндаулова, Р. Б., & Бекмухамедов, Б. М. (2025) · Open Education Studies · doi:10.1515/edu-2025-0113 · Cited by 1
Editorial: Generative AI in business education: some future research directions
Nguyen, N. (2026) · Journal of Trade Science · doi:10.1108/jts-03-2026-076 · Cited by 1
Baskara, R. (2023) · The Journal Of English Teaching For Young And Adult Learners · doi:10.21137/jeeyal.2023.2.2.1
التحليل العنقودي للكلمات المفتاحية لأبحاث روبوتات الدردشة في التعليم
السيد, و. ب. ع., & الحافظي, د. ف. ب. س. س. (2024) · Journal of Educational and Human Sciences · doi:10.33193/jeahs.34.2024.477
Use of AI for Faculty Success and Engagement
(2024) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4074-5.ch013
Navigating the Virtual Landscape
Asrifan, A., Tayibu, K. N., Dewi, A. C., Herlina, H., Lukman, L., & Irviana, I. (2024) · Advances in human and social aspects of technology book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3868-1.ch002
An Innovative Course Structure to Teach Excel to Business School Students
Billouard-Fuentes, D. (2024) · European Conference on e-Learning · doi:10.34190/ecel.23.1.2685
Analysis of the Effect of Using AI as a Tool to Assist Mechatronics Engineering Students in Learning
Niño-Juárez, E., & Menchaca-Torre, H. L. (2024) · World Engineering Education Forum - Global Engineering Deans Council (WEEF-GEDC) · doi:10.1109/weef-gedc63419.2024.10854933
Exploring Prospects of Artificial Intelligence-Based ChatGPT for Higher Education Context
Makgato-Khunou, P., & Tlale, L. D. N. (2025) · Journal of Education and Learning Technology · doi:10.38159/jelt.2025652
Zaman, M. M., Rahman, M. R., Rasul, M. S. U., Zaman, M. S., Fahim, M. M. I., Miami, A. T., Sakif, M. S. I., & Noor, J. (2024) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit64611.2024.11022394
Transforming Workforce Development through AI-Driven Education Networks
Mustafa, S. W., Sari, H., Asriany, A., & Hajeni, H. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5786-7.ch007
Chatbots in Higher Education: Supporting Student Engagement and Retention
Abdullah, Z. B. (2025) · Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation/Advances in science, technology & innovation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56848-0_9
Dahake, P. S., Dahake, N. S., & Santos, V. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-5097-4.ch018
Nguyen, R.-N. (2025) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.65106/apubs.2025.2626
Meletiadou, E. (2025) · The Barcelona Conference on Education official conference proceedings · doi:10.22492/issn.2435-9467.2025.23
Castillo-Ojeda, A. V., Gabriel-Corilloclla, K., Lazaro-Trinidad, L. D., Ticona, L. G. P., Raez, S. S. V., & Rodriguez-Baca, L. S. (2025) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME) · doi:10.1109/iceccme64568.2025.11277754
Retnawati, E. (2025) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2610635
Isaias, P. T., Hoque, T. T., & Miranda, P. (2025) · Cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05817-1_6
AI Chatbots in Education - the Future of Teaching and Learning
Kujundziski, A. P., Ademi, N., & Rahmani, F. (2025) · e-mentor · doi:10.15219/em111.1724 · Cited by 1
Studentisches Engagement an Hochschulen: Ein systematischer Überblick über die Forschungslandschaft
Matischek-Jauk, M., Stöckl, C., Reicher, H., Koschmieder, C., & Krammer, G. (2026) · Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1024/1010-0652/a000406
University Students’ Perceptions and the Use of ChatGPT for Writing in English
Musa, N. N., Zhushi, G., & Nimani, A. (2026) · The New Educational Review · doi:10.15804/tner.2026.83.1.14
The Role of AI in Higher Education
Kayyali, M. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/407423
Raslan, Y. H., Bilal, B. M., Almansour, E., Abuhelou, N., Nemt-allah, M. A., & Elsayed, M. F. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18094269
Using chatbot in education – A systematic review and research agenda
Wut, T. M., Low, M. P., & Tam, K.-W. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102956
Transformational Leadership of School Principals in Improving Teacher Professionalism
Nasruddin, M., Mega, I. Y., Maharani, M., Adawiah, H. Z. A., Anggraeni, L., Sajdah, M., Hariyati, T., & Isa, K. (2025) · Afkarina: Jurnal Studi Keislaman dan Sosial · doi:10.33650/afkarina.v10i2.15351
Tran, M. (2026) · Proceedings of International Academia · doi:10.65956/procia.2026.121
AI Copilots for Differentiated Learning in Linux System Administration: A RAG-Based Approach
Lin, F., & Yong-Fu, H. (2026) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574115
Cognitive AI Agents and Natural Language Processing Transforming Higher Education
Farooqi, A. H. A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2811-7.ch003
Almayez, M., Al-khresheh, M. H., Alruwaili, S. F., Al-Ali, M. N., & Alenezy, F. S. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107322
Cayabyab, M., & Josol, L. (2026) · Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.70838/pemj.590405
Studente, S., Garivaldis, F., & Sargent, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1894156
Teaching in University Settings: Vignettes of Student Engagement
Eloff, I., Dittrich, A.-K., Boon, W., Nia, M. R., Weinberg, L., Mathabathe, K. C., & Agostini, E. (2026) · Student Success · doi:10.63608/ssj.4038
Artificial Intelligence and the Impact on Higher Education
Savin-Baden, Z., & Savin‐Baden, M. (2026) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781042028399
Metadata
- Authors
- Abbas, N., Whitfield, J., Atwell, E., Bowman, H., Pickard, T., & Walker, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Atwell, Eric
- Venue
- International Journal of Lifelong Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-04
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 308-326
- ISSN
- 0260-1370 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-519X
- OpenAlex
- W4281696081
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 54.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Lifelong Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- work was supported
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- adult learners, student engagement, online chat, chatbots, sense of belonging, student isolation, social connectedness, Facebook groups, lifelong learning centers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review