Cited by 245Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline and Blended LearningSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Using chatbots to support student goal setting and social presence in fully online activities: learner engagement and perceptions

Open access
Hew, Khe Foon, Huang, Weijiao, Du, Jiahui, Jia, Chengyuan·2023·Journal of Computing in Higher Education

Abstract

Although fully online learning is now the 'new normal' in many parts of the world, its implementation is often beset by challenges such as the lack of student self-regulation, and the sense of isolation. In this paper, we explored the use of chatbots to support student goal setting (Study 1) and social presence (Study 2) in online activities. In Study 1, participants in a fully online course were invited to complete a goal setting activity prior to attending class via a goal-setting chatbot. The chatbot engaged participants with five questions developed based on the SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and timely) goal setting framework. In Study 2, English-as-Foreign-Language participants in a fully online course were tasked to complete listening practices. The learning buddy chatbot was designed based on the social presence framework (interpersonal communication, open communication, cohesive communication) to guide students through listening exercises. In both Study 1 and 2, we evaluated participants' behavioral engagement by measuring their conversation records with the chatbots, as well as participants' perceived usefulness and ease of use of the chatbots. We also gathered in-depth interview data concerning the participants' perceptions of interacting with the chatbots. Overall, our findings found positive learner experiences with both chatbots with regard to the chatbots' perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. We also provided suggestions for instructors to apply chatbots in teaching and learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12528-022-09338-x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Doran GT There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives Management Review 1981 70 11 35 36

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hew, K. F., Huang, W., Du, J., & Jia, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Hew, Khe Foon
Venue
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Published
2022-09-09
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
40-68
ISSN
  • 1042-1726 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-1233
OpenAlex
W4295753326
Cited by
245
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 1
FWCI
15.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Computing in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Hong Kong (Teaching Development Grant)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, student goal setting, social presence, fully online learning, student engagement, student self-regulation, learner isolation, SMART goals, English as a foreign language, listening practices, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, learner perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review